Person Of Jesus Flashcards
(31 cards)
How does the New Testament speak of Jesus?
The New Testament applies the term ‘God’ to Jesus. Paul speaks of Jesus as God’s ‘own Son’. The New Testament says Jesus is God’s ‘only’ son or ‘own’ son, implying something unique. Jesus seems uniquely close to God as shown in the Baptism of Jesus and the Transfiguration.
How is Jesus’ knowledge of God represented in the Bible?
Jesus calls God ‘Abba’ (Greek for ‘father’) and a heavenly voice declares Jesus ‘my son’ but Jesus does not use the term ‘son’ himself. The Gospels say Jesus comes into this world through the intervention of the Holy Spirit and Mary.
Examples of Jesus being directly associated with God by the text and is believed to be so by Christians.
- St John writes of Jesus as Word, and that the ‘Word was God’
- (Doubting) Thomas refers to Jesus as ‘my Lord and my God’
- in the letter to the Hebrews a psalm is addressed to Jesus as God
- God’s spirit will come again in Jesus’ name
- Jesus has a saving God-like power
- Jesus is worshipped, something done to a God
What idea about Jesus’ closeness to God was rejected by the early church?
If Jesus is God and human, does that mean he had two beings inhabiting one body with one in power over the other? While this explains how Jesus could know God, it would mean Jesus is both God and a separate human being. This was rejected in the early Church:
“… teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; consubstantial (coessential) with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, in-confusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the difference of the Nature being in no way removed because the Union, but rather the properties of each Nature being preserved, and (both) concurring into One Person and One Hypostasis; not as though He were parted or divided into Two Persons, but One and the Self-same Son and Only begotten God, Word, Lord, Jesus Christ”.
What phrase did the early Church use to describe Jesus?
This belief in the ‘perfect conjunction of Jesus’ 2 natures was termed a hypostic union by the early Church. But there were still difficulties.
Hypostic union: the belief that Christ is both fully God and fully human, indivisible, 2 natures united in one person.
How human was Jesus?
In order to save humanity from sin, Jesus had to be divine as only God has that redemptive power. However, if Jesus was God, does that mean he didn’t really suffer on the Cross - as how can a God suffer? If Jesus did not feel pain and did not actually die from Crucifixion, that would mean his Resurrection was not real, the cross is false and Jesus wasn’t a real human being.
Why does Jesus have to be God? Why does Jesus have to be human?
He had to be God, as only God can save. He had to be hi,an, as only humans need saving. If he wasn’t God he couldn’t overcome those forces for humanity. If he’s not God, he can’t reveal the Father; if he isn’t human, he can’t reveal the father to us. Or as Gregory of Nazianzen put it, ‘what he has not assumed he has not healed’.
If Jesus was fully human as well as divine, then that also creates problems. Paul wrote that humans have a sinful, corrupting nature, so if Jesus became human, wouldn’t he become corrupted?
What did Bishop Apollinaris of Laodicea worry about?
Bishop Appolinaris worried that ‘a human mind - that is a changeable mind.. is enslaved to filthy thoughts’, so suggested the Word replaced the human mind and soul with a divine one, without taking on fallible human nature. Gregory of Nazianzen rejected Apollinaris’ suggestion because it constituted a ‘half salvation’. Apollinarism was rejected as heresay.
What do the Church think about Jesus’ humanity?
Most Christian Churches today, including the Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and most Protestant Churches, follow the agreement established by the major ecumenical councils. The First Council of Nicaea in AD325 resolved that Jesus was of the same substance as the Father, or of one being - homoousios. The Council of Chalcedon in AD451 affirmed that Christ is acknowledged in 2 natures, which come together into one person and one hypostasis. Jesus was not a mix or a blend.
The Council of Chalcedon’s definition is not recognised by any Oriental Orthodox Church and, as a result, these Churches may be classified as non-Chalcedonian.
What was the extent of Jesus’ self knowledge?
Was Jesus free to what he did? Is freedom a basic part of being human? Was his knowledge a human knowledge or did he look onto the world as the creator looks onto its creation? To what extent did he have knowledge of of his divine reality? Did he wander around being the Son of God, without realising it?
If Jesus had divine knowledge what do his expressions of emotions mean? Was his anxiety in the Garden of Gethsemane and his tears at the death of Lazarus just fake?
What did Medieval theology respond with about the extent of Jesus’ self knowledge?
Medieval theology responded with three kinds of knowledge that Jesus might have:
- knowledge of the divine reality of God, face-to-face, and all the created realities (scientia visions)
- an infused knowledge (scientia infusa)
- knowledge of life in the normal way of human life (scientia experientia)
What is Karl Rahner’s solution to the extent of Jesus’ self-knowledge?
Karl Rahner suggests a genuinely human consciousness must have an unknown future in front of it. Our life is conditioned by our uncertainty. If Jesus was conscious of God the Father’s awareness all the time, then his view of life can hardly be called a human one.
Rahner’s solution is to think of an onion, with its many layers of skin. We have deep within us better understandings of our self which are not always on the surface of our consciousness. The expression of fear in Gethsemane or uncertainty in the desert or on the cross makes sense if Jesus’ human self - consciousness was close to the surface but his divine self - consciousness was deep within.
What challenges does Gerald O’Collins raise about the possibility of answering these kinds of questions?
- It is very difficult to undertake any study of the inner world of any being, alive or dead, so trying to make sense of the kind of inner experience of life that Jesus might have is very challenging, particularly as he left no writings of his own.
- Before anyone can say ‘yes, Jesus knew he was the saviour’ a person must first show an appreciation of the complexity of knowledge, the multi-layered structure of how we experience reality, with memory, emotion, experience, intuition, instinct, identity and many other factors play a part. Know theyself is easier said than done.
- Consciousness is not the same as knowledge of a separate object. Knowledge of a separate object takes place without reflection, but consciousness always involves a degree of reflection.
O’Collins concludes that one answer is possible given all of these caveats:
“What did Jesus know about himself and his mission?… He knew that he stood in a unique relationship to the Father and that as the Son he had a mission of salvation for others….. His basic awareness of his Sonship did not mean observing the presence of God, as if Jesus were facing an object out there. It was rather a self consciousness and self-presence in which he was intuitively aware of his divine reality”.
What may miracles suggest about Jesus?
The account of Jesus’ miracles would indicate to those that believe them that there is something very special about Jesus. For example, his authority over death, illness and nature of Godly attributes. At the time of Jesus, humans could not control death, nature or the human body in ways that we might be able to nowadays.
What does Hume suggest about miracles?
Hume suggested that as we have no current day proof of Jesus’ miracles, it’s not possible to trust them even if the Gospel writers believe that they were truth.
What does Schillebeeckx say about miracles?
Schillebeeckx says maybe Jesus calming the storm is a metaphor Jesus bringing calm into our lives.
What does Wright say about miracles?
Wright takes this further and suggests that Jesus is not just bringing calm to the individual, but, in his time, Jesus was bringing calm to a factionalised society drawing different groups together to start establishing the kingdom of God on Earth.
These miracles might be something more however. They are direct evidence that Jesus uses to show us that he is the Son of God.
What did Paul say about the resurrection?
Paul says that ‘we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead. But he did not raise him if in fact the dead are not raised’ (1 Cor 15:15)
‘And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith’ (1 Cor 15:14)
What did N.T. Wright suggest about the resurrection?
N.T Wright suggests that the belief that Jesus had been raised from the dead was the reason Jesus’ disciples regrouped and rapidly changed their traditional worship practices to focus on Jesus. The disciples had been shattered by Jesus’ crucifixion and without this belief in his Resurrection, the Christian Church would not have been developed.
Resurrection became fundamental to what Christians believe about God: like Jesus, everyone will be raised from the dead. Salvation is dependent on believing that Jesus was resurrected: ‘If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord”, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved’ (Romans 10:9).
What does the resurrection show about God and Jesus?
It is a great demonstration of power and underlines Jesus’ status. On the other hand, Jesus himself raise Lazarus and Jairus’ daughter from the dead.
The resurrection of Jesus discloses God in a new and startling way, through a focus on suffering, new life and unconditional love. “it enables the death of Christ upon the cross to be interpreted in terms of God’s victory over death [and] it gives birth foundation and substance to the Christian hope of eternal life”. - McGrath.
The resurrection vindicates his certainty in the future Kingdom of God: what O’Collins thinks. The preaching and miracles of Jesus had met with apparent defeat but it’s power is demonstrated through the Resurrection and justifies Jesus’ personal authority. Luke emphasises vindication in the Act of the Apostles.
The resurrection is the full and final revelation of Jesus: It fully and finally reveals and seals the meaning and truth of Jesus’ life, person, work and death. Paul emphasises revelation (Galatians 1:12, 1:16) in his reading of the Resurrection, and the New Testament presents the Resurrection in a very different way from any other miracle. It is described as the beginning of the end of all things.
The Resurrection reveals the glorified transformed being: It reveals Jesus in a new and finally transfigured way. It is the fulfilment of the promise Jesus made to to the Sunhedris ‘And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven’ Mark 14:62, New International Version), and this is visualised through his ascension into heavenly glory (Luke 24:51, Acts 1:9-11 and John 20:17).
Realisation that the weak can mediate God’s revelation: In the Resurrection there is the realisation that ‘the weak, the despised, and the suffering - those who became fools for God’s sake - can serve as special meditators of revelation (and salvation)’ (O’Collins). Jesus shows God’s self-giving, divine love, even to the extent of an appalling death: ‘But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we are still sinners, Christ died for us’ (Romans 5:8, New International Version).
‘For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life’ (John 3:16, New International Version).
What does it mean to call Jesus a teacher of wisdom?
To call Jesus a teacher of wisdom means that he gave moral guidance. He taught people how to be good. Even Richard Dawkins said that Jesus was a great moral teacher (although, this is a backhanded compliment as Dawkins believes that Jesus was nothing but a teacher).
Much of Jesus’ teachings are centred around love for our neighbour, love for God and forgiveness. Jesus highlights our responsibility towards those less fortunate and warns that we will be judged if we fail to help them (the Parable of the Rich man and Lazarus, the parable of the Sheep and the Goats, and the parable of the Good Samaritan).
What did John Hick say about Jesus as a teacher of wisdom?
John Hick has stated that there is nothing unique in Jesus’ attitude about love. Indeed, he states that all of the main world religions have similar figures who promote the idea of loving your neighbour and loving God.
Hick suggests that Jesus is our incarnation of the ultimate role model for how to be good, but this is not the same as Jesus being divine.
How did C.S.Lewis criticise John Hick?
C.S.Lewis criticised John Hick saying that you cannot separate Jesus as a moral guide from Jesus as the Son of God. These are indivisible qualities of Jesus.
What did Bonhoeffer say?
Bonhoeffer’s beliefs have strong links to the idea that we meet God in those who are oppressed. When God became flesh in Jesus he experienced human emotion and suffering. Bonhoeffer believed that we become closer to God when we suffer. This is backed up by Jesus’ teachings in the Beatitudes.