Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

1
Q

What is personal jurisdiction?

A

Power of court over particular person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two main steps for asserting personal jurisdiction?

A
  1. look at the state law
  2. look at the 14th Amendment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do you ask about the state law to determine whether PJ may be asserted?

A

Could a state court under state law assert PJ over that party?

If yes, the federal court may assert PJ (subject to constitutional considerations); but if the state court could not assert, then federal court cannot assert PJ either

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the point of looking at the Fourteenth Amendment when analyzing whether a court has PJ?

A

Must determine whether the state law is constitutional under the Due Process Clause (DP) of the 14th Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the five ways in which a state law permissibly authorizes PJ?

A
  1. residency
  2. consent
  3. service
  4. minimum contacts
  5. “at home” general jurisdiction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How could residency allow a federal court to assert PJ?

A

If party is a resident (domiciled) of state where suit filed, PJ is constitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is residency determined for corporations?

A

Corporation is a resident of state(s) where incorporated and where it has its principal place of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How could consent allow a federal court to assert PJ?

A

A party can consent to PJ in three ways:
1. appearance: Party appears in court without objecting to PJ (must object to PJ in initial filing or first appearance before court)
2. Contract: If D Signed K with choice-of-forum clause = consent
3. Appointment: Some states require businesses to appoint agents located in state to receive process = consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How could service allow a federal court to assert PJ?

A

D served with process while in state where suit filed (tag)

This would not be constitutional if the P enticed or force D into the state OR D was in state to participate in a different legal proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How could minimum contacts allow a federal court to assert PJ?

A

i) D has established a minimum contact with the forum state (established if D causes harm in the state, does business, or has an interest in real property in the state)
ii) Claim against D arises from that contact, AND
iii) PJ wont offend traditional notions of fair play + substantial justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly