Personality and Diversity Flashcards
(41 cards)
Personality
- A persistent set of characteristics qualities and traits that taken together form a unique person… the sum of the ways an individual reacts to and interacts with others
- When someone exhibits these characteristics in a large number of situations, we call them the personality traits of that person More consistent = more central
Dispositional approach
- Individuals’ personalities determine their behaviour
and they possess stable traits or characteristics that influence their attitudes and behaviours - Individuals are predisposed to behave in certain ways.
Situational approach
Characteristics of the work environment influence people’s attitudes and behaviours
Interactionist approach
People’s attitudes and behaviours are a function of both disposition and the situation
Situation strength theory
Depends on: Clarity (Cues about duties & responsibilities are clear),
* Consistency (compatible duties goals and responsibilities)
* Constraints (freedom limited by outside forces),
* Consequences (decisions and actions are important)
Strong situations
Situations where there are clear and defined roles, rules, and contingencies.
Trait activation theory
Certain situations activate personality traits
People thrive in work contexts where their traits are activated
Trait activation leads to performance when these traits are valued
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
Energy (Extravert, Introvert)
Information (Sensing, Intuition)
Decisions (thinking, Feeling)
Lifestyle (Judging, Perceiving )
Challenges to MBTI
- Reliability: Inconsistent results across time and people
- Validity: Does not predict outcomes we care about ( i.e. job performance)
- Conceptualization: Forced dichotomization of continuous variables
- Understandability: Not easily interpretable
OCEAN Framework
Says personality types include 5 dimensions. Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism.
Openness to experience
- Preference for novelty and variety
E.g.: Flexible/open to change vs resistant to change
Creativity vs unimaginative
Conscientiousness
The tendency to be disciplined, organized, and reliable
E.G.: Responsible vs irresponsible
Dependable vs. impulsive
Orderly vs. messy
Self-disciplined vs. careless
Extraversion
Sociability and the tendency to seek stimulation in the company of others
E.G.: Outgoing vs shy
Assertive vs cautious
Energized vs. drained by busy environments
Agreeableness
The tendency to be prosocial and cooperative with others
Neuroticism/ emotional stability
Vulnerability to unpleasant emotions and difficulty withstanding stress
Big 5 measurement issues
The most common method is self-reported surveys but
Individuals lie, especially when results are used for evaluation purposes
Situational factors can affect results (i.e., a bad mood)
Core self-evaluation
- Self-esteem- How you see yourself “I love myself”
- Self-efficacy- Belief you can do it “I can do it”
- Locus of control- Internal vs. external “I can control it”
Self-monitoring
An individual’s ability to accurately read and adjust behaviour to external, situational factors
High self-monitors:
Make contradictions- public & private selves
Receive more promotions, occupy central positions
More likely to emerge as leaders
Deep diversity
Attitudes opinions values information- Take time to emerge
Surface diversity
Sex, race, gender, age, etc. -Are more readily observable
Intersectionality
“Individuals have different identities that intersect in ways that impact how they are viewed understood and treated” Crenshaw
Intersectionality at work:
Black, Asian, and White women are subject to distinct stereotypes which impact how they are treated e.g warm and agreeable. Are often penalized when they act different
People struggle to remember Black women’s names and faces compared to Black men, White women & White men.
The Business Case for diversity
Business case: Organizations should value diversity because it is instrumental to organizational goals “Do it because it has benefits”
* Decreases sense of belonging and organizational attractiveness among underrepresented groups
* Generate performance contingent support
Fairness/ Moral case:
organizations should value diversity because it is the morally and ethically sound thing to do