Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Second Year Second Semester > Personality Midterm 1 > Flashcards

Personality Midterm 1 Flashcards

(101 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

Personality

A

No one single definition -
* o A set of psychological traits and mechanisms
o Existing within an individual
o Organised and enduring
o Influencing interactions with (and adaptions to) the intrapsychic (in the psyche), physical (environment), and social environments (environment of people)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Trait

A

Something long-lasting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State

A

A temporary type of presentation of behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Psychological traits

A

Characteristics that describe ways in which people are similar AND different from each other; describe the average tendencies of a person
• Help to describe people and the dimensions of difference between people
• Help to explain behaviour
• Help to predict behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Psychological Mechanisms

A

Inputs: Traits may make people more sensitive to certain kinds of information from the environment
Decision rules: Traits may make people more likely to think about specific options
Outputs: Traits may guide people’s behaviour toward certain categories of action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Organized

A

Organized mechanisms and traits are linked in a coherent fashion; contain decision rules that govern which needs are activated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Enduring

A

Stable over time; state vs trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Perceptions

A

How we see or interpret an environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Selections

A

Way in which we choose situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evocations

A

Reactions we produce in others; often unintentional (evoking/bringing out something in another person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Manipulations

A

Intentional attempts to influence others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Physical environment

A

Threats to survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social environment

A

Competition for jobs, mates, friends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intrapsychic environment

A

Within the mind; includes memories, dreams, desires, fantasies; we evaluate our self-esteem based on the degree to which we are attaining our goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Human Nature

A

Like all others

Ways in which we are all alike; universals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Individual and group differences

A

Like some others

Ways in which we are like some people but unlike others; particulars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Individual uniqueness

A

Like no others

Ways in which we are unlike any other person; uniqueness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Nomothetic Approach

A

(To individual uniqueness)
Statistical comparisons of individuals or groups; identify universal human characteristics and dimensions of individual or group differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Idiographic Approach

A

Focus on a single subject; observe the general principles that manifest in a single life over time e.g, case studies (“Gold standard”, although not quite feasible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Grand theories

A

Human nature level of analysis; focus on universal accounts (Universal psychic structure of id, ego, superego)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Contemporary theories

A

Focus on the ways individuals and groups differ (biological sex differences and/or cultural differences in terms of a trait)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Dispositional Domain

A

Identify and measure the most important ways individuals differ from one another; origins of differences and how they develop and are maintained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Biological Domain

A

Role of genetics (e.g., using twin studies), psychophysiology (i.e., nervous system functioning), and evolution (i.e., survival and reproduction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Intrapsychic Domain

A

Mental mechanisms of personality; often operate outside conscious awareness; psychoanalytic theory; role of motives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Cognitive-experiential Domain
Subjective experiences; role of self, self-esteem, and self-concept; goal-striving behaviours; role of emotions and emotional expression
26
Social and Cultural Domain
Influence of social and cultural environment in what personality traits are displayed
27
Adjustment Domain
Personality plays a role in how we cope, adapt, and adjust to the events of our daily lives; impact of personality on mental and physical health
28
A Good Theory
o Provides a guide for researches o Organizes known findings o Makes predictions
29
What are the 5 Scientific Standards for Evaluating Personality Theories?
* Comprehensiveness * Heuristic value * Testability * Parsimony * Compatibility and integration across domains and levels
30
Comprehensiveness
Explains most or all known facts
31
Heuristic Value
Guides researchers to important new discoveries
32
Testability
Makes precise predictions that can be empirically tested
33
Parsimony
Contains few premises or assumptions
34
Compatibility and Integration across Domains and Levels
Consistent with what is known in other domains; can be coordinated with other branches of scientific knowledge
35
Self-report Data (S-Data)
Information a person reveals about themselves
36
Observer-report Data (O-Data)
information about a person’s personality from other people; can use people who know or do not know (professional personality assessors) the participant
37
Naturalistic observation
Witness and record events that occur normally in a participant’s life; but there is issue of a lack of researcher control
38
Artificial observation
Observe how a participant behaves in a constructed setting but the issue of a lack of realism for the participant
39
Test data (T-Data)
Results of standardized testing; elicit behaviour in a controlled context to test specific hypotheses
40
Life-outcome Data (L-Data)
Information from events, activities, and outcomes in a person’s life that are available to public scrutiny
41
Reliability
Degree to which an obtained measure represents the true level of the trait being measured (Measure weight with a scale)
42
Repeated Measurement
Repeat a measurement over time; if the two tests are highly correlated, measure has high test-retest reliability
43
Internal Consistency Reliability
Examine the relationship among items on a test; need to ensure items all correlate well with each other
44
Inter-rater reliability
Examine measurements from multiple observers; need observers to agree with one another
45
Response sets
Tendency of people to respond to questions on a basis that is unrelated to the question content; aka noncontent responding
46
Face validity
Whether the test [on the surface] appears to measure what it is supposed to measure
47
Predictive validity
Whether the test predicts criteria external to the test (aka criterion validity)
48
Convergent validity
Whether a test correlates with other measures that it should correlate with
49
Discriminant validity
Refers to what a measure should NOT correlate with; evaluated simultaneously with convergent validity
50
Construct validity
Broadest type; includes face, predictive, convergent and discriminant validity; can the measure claim to be a valid way of assessing the construct?
51
Generalizability
Degree to which the measure retains its validity across various contexts
52
Experimental methods
Used to determine causality; how one variable influences another variable
53
Variable
Quality that differs for different people; e.g., height, weight, aggressiveness
54
Random Assignment
If there are groups, randomly assign participants to either experimental or control groups; equal chance of being assigned to a condition
55
Counterbalancing
If participants are exposed to both groups, the order is balanced so half the participants get Group 1 first then Group 2, and other half get Group 2 first then Group 1
56
Mean
Average
57
Standard Deviation
Measure of variability within each condition
58
T-test
Statistical formula; calculates the difference between two means
59
p-value
Difference between means that is significant at .05 implies that the finding would be likely to occur by change alone only 5 times out of 100 (statistically significant)
60
Correlational studies
Determining if there is a relationship between variables w/o manipulation
61
Correlational coefficient
Procedure for gauging relationships between variables o Range from +1.00 through 0.00 to -1.00 o Can be positively related, unrelated, or negatively related
62
Disposition
Inherent tendency to behave in a specific way; used interchangeably with trait
63
Act nomination
Procedure that identifies which acts belong in which trait categories; e.g., what acts fit the category of impulsivity?
64
Prototypicality Judgement
Which acts are central to each trait category? E.g, what acts are representative of impulsivity?
65
Recording of act performance
Securing information on the actual performance of individuals; often use self-reports
66
Lexical Approach
Language/words used to describe differences among people
67
Statistical Approach
Factor analysis/stats to identify major personality traits
68
Theoretical Approach
Reliance on theories to identify important traits
69
Lexical Hypothesis
All important individual differences have been encoded within the natural language; allow us to communicate w/ others
70
Statistical Approach
Starts w. a pool of personality items and then identifies groups or clusters of items; goal is to identify the major dimensions
71
Factor Analysis
Identifies groups of items that covary (go together) but do not covary w/ other groups of items
72
Factor Loadings
Indexes of how much of the variation in an item is explained by the factor; degree to which the item correlates or loads on an underlying factor
73
Theoretical approach
Starts w/ a theory that determines which variables are important to measure
74
Taxonomies of Personality - Eysenck
- Psychoticism (P) - Extraversion-introversion (E) - Neuroticism-emotional stability (N)
75
Psychoticism
Impulsivity; lack of empathy; antisocial tendencies (not psychopathy, but could be precursor
76
Extraversion
High activity level; require having people around
77
Introversion
Prefer quieter activities, prefer routine, predictable lifestyles
78
Neuroticism
Overactivity on negative emotions; greater emotional arousal to stress; trouble returning to baseline emotional self after stressful event
79
Hierarchical Model
Super-traits at the top; narrower traits at second level; habitual acts at third level; specific acts at fourth level o When specific acts are repeated frequently become habitual acts o Clusters of habitual acts become narrow traits o Clusters of narrow traits become super-traits
80
Heritability
Genetic evidence; PEN have moderate heritability
81
Identifiable Physiological Substrate
Can identify properties in the brain/CNS that are part of a causal chain that produces personality traits o Psychoticism: levels of testosterone (+) and MAO (-) (neurotransmitter inhibitor) o Extraversion: linked to CNS arousal/reactivity o Neuroticism: linked to lability (changeability) of the ANS
82
Cattell's Taxonomy
16 Personality System Named factors A, B, etc. Believed true factors of personality should be found across different data sources (S- data, T-data) Strong empirical strategy for identifying basic personality dimensions Criticized for not being concise enough
83
Leary and Wiggins Taxonomy
Circumplex (circle) taxonomies of personality - Expanded on Lexical assumption – trait terms specify different kinds of ways in which individuals differ Strengths: - Explicit definition of interpersonal behaviour - Specifies relationships between each trait and every other trait in the model Limitations: - Interpersonal map is limited in two dimensions; need a more comprehensive taxonomy
84
Interpersonal traits
(Leary&Wiggins) | What people do to/with each other
85
Temperament traits
(Leary&Wiggins) | e.g., nervous, gloomy, excitable
86
Character traits
(Leary&Wiggins) | e.g., moral, principled, dishonest
87
Material traits
(Leary&Wiggins) | e.g., miserly, stingy
88
Attitude traits
(Leary&Wiggins) | e.g., clever, logical, perceptive
89
Physical traits
(Leary&Wiggins) | e.g., healthy, tough
90
Adjacency
How close the traits are to each other, positively correlated
91
Bipolarity
Traits on opposite sides of the circle, negatively correlated
92
Orthogonality
Traits that are perpendicular to each other are unrelated, zero correlation
93
Five-Factor Model (Big 5)
OCEAN - (I): Extraversion or surgency - (II): Agreeableness - (III): Conscientiousness - (IV): Neuroticism or emotional instability - (V): Openness-intellect or openness to experience Formed from lexical and statistical approaches
94
Extraversion (Surgency)
- Key feature of social attention; have a strong impact on their social environment - More involved in their work/enjoy their work - More cooperative and outgoing - Engage in risk-taking behaviour (which can be dangerous)
95
Agreeableness
- Favour using negotiation to resolve conflicts; withdraw from social conflict - Prosocial, empathic; value prosocial behaviours in others - Disagreeable individuals are aggressive and often engage in social conflict
96
Conscientiousness
- Hardworking (industrious), punctual, and reliable - Higher GPA, greater job satisfaction/security BUT risk of poor mental health when unemployed - More positive/committed social relationships - Don’t procrastinate, perfectionists, and score high on achievement motivation
97
Neuroticism
- Key feature is variability of mood over time - High scores report poorer physical health, more physical symptoms, fewer attempts to engage in health-promoting behaviours - High scorers struggle with everyday stresses/strains; more susceptible to emotional fatigue and burnout - Engage in self-handicapping behaviour
98
Intellect-openness
- High scorers remember their dreams more, have more waking dreams; also have more vivid, prophetic, and/or problem-solving type dreams - Linked to experimentation w/ new foods and experiences - More creative and more open to receiving information from a variety of senses
99
Comprehensiveness of the Model
- Critics think factors are missing such as: Positive evaluation (e.g., outstanding vs. ordinary), negative evaluation (e.g., awful vs. decent), religiosity and spirituality, attractiveness, sexiness, and faithfulness - Approach of looking at personality-descriptive nouns rather than adjectives - Importance of facets: e.g., need for achievement (facet of conscientiousness)
100
Dark Triad
* Narcissism: self-admiration * Psychopathy: antisocial tendencies (go against social norms [rule-breaking tendencies]) * Machiavellianism: exploitative and manipulative interpersonal style
101
Meyers-Brigg Type Indicator (MBTI)
o Tests eight fundamental preferences (Table 4.1) o Reduces preferences to four scores: extraverted OR introverted; sensing OR intuitive, thinking OR feeling; judging OR perceiving o Four scores combine to yield a type; 16 types total Issues with the MBTI? o Based on the theory of psychological types which has not been widely endorsed by research; personality is dimensional, not categorical o A typology system assumes large between-category differences and no within-category differences; e.g., all extraverted types are not the same Be careful about using for employment purposes!! Why is it used? - Popular - Easy to score/administer - Makes you think about how to work with others who differ from you

Second Year Second Semester (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions