ph Flashcards
(104 cards)
NRCT Disadvantage
very prone to bias
RCT Disadvantages
Time Consuming
Expensive
Specific inclusion/exclusion criteria may mean the study population is different from typical patients (e.g. excluding very elderly people)
RCT Advantage
Low risk of bias and confounding
Can infer causality (gold standard)
RCT Define
Patients are randomised into groups, one group is given an intervention, the other is given a control and the outcome is measured. Randomisation allows confounding features to be equally distributed.
Types of Observational Study
Types of Experimental/Interventional Study
Observational
Descriptive - case report, ecological
Descriptive and Analytical - cross-sectional
Analytical - Case-control, cohort
Experimental/Interventional
RCT or NRCT
Case Report Description
study individuals
Ecological study Description
use routinely collected data to show trends in data and thus is useful for generating hypotheses. Shows prevalence and association, cannot show causation.
Cross-Sectional Desrciption
Divides population into those without the disease and those with the disease and collect data on them once at a defined time to find associations at that point in time. They are used to generate hypotheses but are prone to bias and have no time reference.
Cross-sectional Advantages
Relatively quick and cheap
Provide data on prevalence at a single point in time
Large sample size
Good for surveillance and public health planning
Cross-sectional Disadvantages
Risk of reverse causality (don’t know whether outcome or exposure came first)
Cannot measure incidence
Risk recall bias and non-response
Case-control description
These are retrospective studies that take people with a disease and match them to people without the disease for age/sex/habitat/class etc and study previous exposure to the agent in question.
Case- control advantages
Good for rare outcomes (e.g. cancer)
Quicker than cohort or intervention studies (as the outcome has already happened)
Can investigate multiple exposures
Case-control Disadvantages
Difficulties finding controls to match with cases
Prone to selection and information bias
Cohort study Description
These studies start with a population without the disease in question and study them over time to see if they are exposed to the agent in question and if they develop the disease in question or not.
Cohort study Advantages
Prospective
Can follow-up a group with a rare exposure (e.g. a natural disaster)
Good for common and multiple outcomes
Less risk of selection and recall bias
Cohort Disadvantages
Takes a long time
Loss to follow up (people drop out)
Need a large sample size
Length Time Bias
Type of bias resulting from differences in the length of time taken for a condition to progress to severe effects, that may affect the apparent efficacy of a screening method
Lead Time Bias
When screening identifies an outcome earlier than it would otherwise have been identified this results in an apparent increase in survival time, even if screening has no effect on outcome.
NPV
the proportion of people with a negative test result who do not have the disease (d/c+d) - this is lower if the prevalence is higher
PPV
the proportion of people with a positive test result who actually have the disease (a/a+b) - this is higher if the prevalence is higher
Specificity
the proportion of people without the disease who are correctly excluded by the screening test (d/b+d)
Sensitivity
the proportion of people with the disease who are correctly identified by the screening test (a/a+c)
Wilson and Jeungner
• The condition
o Important health problem
o Latent / preclinical phase
o Natural history known
• The screening test
o Suitable (sensitive, specific, inexpensive) o Acceptable • The treatment o Effective o Agreed policy on whom to treat • The organisation and costs o Facilities o Costs of screening should be economically balanced in relation to healthcare spending as a whole o Should be an ongoing process
Disadvantages of Screening
- Exposure of well individuals to distressing or harmful diagnostic tests
- Detection and treatment of sub-clinical disease that would never have caused any problems
- Preventive interventions that may cause harm to the individual or population