PhD Viva Flashcards
Practice for my PhD viva (459 cards)
Overview: What is the title of your PhD thesis?
Improving physical activity for people with physical disabilities: A mixed methods approach
Overview: What are the names of your PhD viva examiners?
Dr Emma Pullen (Internal) and Dr Jennifer Tomasone (External)
Overview: Summarise your thesis in a sentence?
My thesis looks at ways of improving physical activity for people with physical disabilities through the use of a novel health intervention such as mobile health (mHealth) solutions
Overview: How did you come up with the idea for this project?
I have always been interested in physical activity for people with disabilities. Based on my MSc dissertation, which explored the barriers and facilitators to physical activity for people with disabilities, I wanted to extend this type of work and find a solution to address this issue, which is how my PhD project came together.
Overview: Describe your thesis in brief?
The overall focus of my PhD is to understand how to increase physical activity in adults with physical disabilities.
Overview: Why did you choose this topic?
During my MSc my dissertation focused on the barriers and facilitators to physical activity for people with physical and sensory disabilities. As I was progressing onto a PhD, I wanted my PhD to address these barriers by developing an app. My PhD initially started with developing an intervention until Ali/Accessercise approached us where we ended up evaluating his intervention (or app).
Overview: Why is this topic important, and to whom is it relevant?
Our topic is important because people with disabilities are a physically inactive population, are at risk of numerous health complications and are not meeting recommended guidelines. Therefore, this population requires support and need interventions to be designed to overcome this challenge.
Overview: What are the key findings?
Chapters 2-5 have highlighted that mHealth is a potential and promising strategy to increase physical activity in marginalised populations, including adults with physical disabilities.
This mixed-methods thesis has provided a novel insight into ways of improving physical activity for adults with disabilities, an area which has been under researched.
Novel findings which have used the Accessercise have found to be positive. Overall, it is anticipated that the findings reported from this thesis will propose solid evidence base of the benefits of physical activity for adults with physical disabilities, and as a result influence the design, implementation and evaluation of future physical activity interventions that can lead to better QoL in this population.
Overview: What are your contributions to knowledge?
We evaluated a novel mHealth application, namely Accessercise which has yet to be evaluated.
Overview: What are some of the limitations of your thesis?
- The overall effectiveness of the Accessercise app was yet to be established. We were unable to evaluate and understand the intervention’s long term effects.
- The Accessercise app was under developed during the time that we evaluated it. Therefore, this may have impacted the findings that we obtained for the usability (Chapter 4) and our feasibility work (Chapter 5).
- The majority of outcomes employed within our research used self-reported outcomes via questionnaires, which are at risk of social desirability and recall bias.
- Recruiting difficulties - Most participants in our research were Male, White British, and were from the East Midlands areas.
Overview: What is the future of your research?
Some recommendations include:
- Further high quality RCTs, which include objective measures of physical activity, long-term follow-up and bigger sample sizes.
- A larger definitive trial is needed to assess the effectiveness of the Accessercise app in terms of increasing physical activity.
- To identify solutions to increase recruitment and retention of a diverse sample of adults with physical disabilities in mHealth interventions, that better reflects the population of the UK and internationally.
- To identify better solutions to improve access to mHealth interventions for people with disabilities and identify ways to overcome social exclusion, marginalisation, and disability stigma.
- To investigate whether delivering different physical activity interventions for manual wheelchair users with SCI via different modes of delivery (e.g., telephone, counselling, weekly video conferencing) can result in long term benefits.
Overview: What is the benefit of your research to society?
My research can benefit theory, practice and health-care professionals.
- My PhD can be encouraging for the community of people with physical disabilities, as the findings have indicated that Accessercise is feasible, adhered to, and was received positively among people with physical disabilities.
- The app may support people with disabilities in the community to overcome physical activity barriers and help them in addressing the low physical activity rates in adults with physical disabilities across the UK.
- Lastly, this research has shown the benefits of including people with disabilities in research and can help other researchers when designing and evaluating similar physical activity mHealth interventions for people with disabilities.
Overview: How are you going to make sure your research has an impact and how are you going to share it?
Some of the ways that I will ensure my research has impact is through the following:
- Academic publications (I will ensure that my work gets published, so that it’s readable to a wider audience e.g., researchers, app developers, lay audience).
- Present my research at academic conferences (e.g., Pint of Science, Loughborough Annual Conference), so that other researchers can build upon my work.
- Engaging with the public - Delivering presentation/talks about my work so that a lay audience can benefit.
Overview: What are your next steps?
Some recommendations include:
- Further high quality RCTs, which include objective measures of physical activity, long-term follow-up and bigger sample sizes.
- A larger definitive trial is needed to assess the effectiveness of the Accessercise app in terms of increasing physical activity.
- To identify solutions to increase recruitment and retention of a diverse sample of adults with physical disabilities in mHealth interventions, that better reflects the population of the UK and internationally.
- To identify better solutions to improve access to mHealth interventions for people with disabilities and identify ways to overcome social exclusion, marginalisation, and disability stigma.
- To investigate whether delivering different physical activity interventions for manual wheelchair users with SCI via different modes of delivery (e.g., telephone, counselling, weekly video conferencing) can result in long term benefits.
Research Questions: What are your main research questions and how did you select them?
My main research questions was to assess ways of ‘improving physical activity for adults with physical disabilities’ By following the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, we undertook four important questions:
(1) A systematic review to assess the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury
(2) Assess the theoretical underpinning of a smartphone application (Accessercise) that aims to increase physical activity for adults with disabilities
(3) Assess the Usability of the Smartphone App
(4) Assess the feasibility of the Smartphone App
Chapter 1 (Introduction): What are models of Disability?
Models of Disability are frameworks that explain how disability is understood and addressed in society.
Chapter 1 (Introduction): What is the Medical Model of Disability?
The medical model views disability as an ‘individualised problem’ rather than a social or political problem, as it focuses on what is ‘wrong’ with the individual rather than what the person
‘needs’ to function correctly.
Chapter 1 (Introduction): What is the Social Model of Disability?
The model says that people are disabled by barriers in society, not by their impairment or difference.
Chapter 1 (Introduction): What are some of the limitations of the medical model?
Disability is mainly portrayed as a medical problem, with an individual with disabilities could feel stigmatised and of less importance within society in general.
Chapter 1 (Introduction): What are two of the most popular models of society?
The Medical and Social Models of Disabiltiy
Chapter 1 (Introduction): Why have you chosen the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW)?
The Behavior Change Wheel is the most comprehensive and practically useful methodology available for developing behavior change interventions.
Chapter 1 (Introduction): Sum your PhD up in one sentence?
To understand how to increase physical activity for adults with physical disabilities.
General: What are the weakness of your work?
- When we evaluated the Accessercise app, it was mainly under development. Therefore, a good chunk of features of the app were not available, which may have impacted the findings of Studies 3 -4.
- The majority of participants we recruited were White British, male, had a Spinal Cord Injury and lived within the East Midlands area. So, therefore, our findings are not generalisable to the wider population.
- Effectiveness - Despite evaluating the Accessercise app, we were unable to test the overall effectiveness of the phyiscal acitvity app and whether the app can support people with disabilities in achieving long-term behaviour change.
- The majority of outcomes that were measured (e.g., Systematic Review and Feasibility Trial) used self-reported such as questionnaires/surveys.
General: What are you most proud of about your work?
I’m most proud about undertaking a systematic review with meta-analysis for the first time and understanding the different components that are involved in the process. In addition, working with people with various physical disabilities through testing their outcomes and seeing whether there were any improvements.