Phil Flashcards
(100 cards)
What are the different types of dilemmas?
Moral dilemma: moral standard VS moral standard
Motivational dilemma: moral standard VS practical standard
Practical dilemma: practical standard VS practical standard
Descriptive vs prescriptive statements
- Economics makes descriptive statements –> knowledge about ‘what is’
- Ethics makes prescriptive statement, knowledge of ‘what ought to be done’
What are the three statements of economics decision making?
- Value statement (what ought to be done), from normative theory
- Positive statement (how to achieve the goal of the value statement
- Policy conclusion: combines statement 1 and 2. ‘To achieve x government should apply policy y.’
What is the difference between microeconomic and macroeconomic ethics, as described by Kouwenhoven (1981)?
- Micro encompasses both individuals and individual households and businesses, evaluating the actions of these individual entities.
- Macro considers the morality of economic structures. Does economic order respect ethical standards?
What are the institutions? What are the different types of institutions?
- “Systems of established and prevalent social rules that structure social interactions”
- Regulative: rules, sanctions and regulations which codify socially accepted behaviour
- Normative: values, social norms, beliefs and assumptions about human nature
- Cognitive: structures structures and social knowledge shared by people in a given group
What are intrinsic and extrinsic values?
Something is intrinsically valuable when the thing itself is valuable, extrinsic values are values that are merely good as a means to something else (e.g. money)
How did John Locke morally defend free markets?
Based on the theory of moral rights. Markets are supposed to respect the rights of freedom and the right to private property. Each has ownership of his own body, labor and its products. Governments should only act as insofar to protect these rights, thus they should not manipulate the market.
What is the basic principle of utilitarianism? What are its three components?
-The greatest happiness for the greatest number (Jeremy Bentham).
- Consequentialism, welfarism, sum ranking.
What is consequentialism?
It asserts that choices or policies must be judged exclusively in terms of the resulting or consequent effect, rather than by any intrinsic feature they may have. (OUTCOME matters NOT process). The option with better consequences is morally obligatory.
What is welfarism? How does it link with utilitarianism and consequentialism?
A utilitarian is a consequentialist who says that what is good is welfare. Welfarism sustains that the goodness of a state of affairs is purely a function of utility or welfare. Essentially, welfarism says that utility is what determines how good something is, and thus utility should be the only goal. It provides a measure for consequentialism.
What are the different types of welfarism?
- Hedonism, by Jeremy Bentham: everything is reduced to standard measures of pleasure and pain. This is a monistic concept, as it assumes all values can be measured on the same scale.
- Individual sovereignty, which is used by economists. Individuals are the only ones who can assess their own welfare. Utility is simply the satisfaction of one’s preferences.
What is sum ranking?
The total sum of utilities should be maximised with equal weight to utility of different individuals. Marginal utility should be equalised.
How is cost-benefit analysis used to implement utilitarianisim?
- Who is affected and how?
- How much are they willing to pay for each policy? If they are negatively affected: how much compensation would they require?
- Determine the sum of these individual valuations and select the alternative with highest net benefit.
What are the problems of consequentialism?
- no intrinsic value of rights
- no consideration of intentions
- disregards retributive justice
- consequences are difficult to predict
What are the problems with welfarism?
- happiness is not the only valuable thing
- utility does not adequately represent well-being (formal definition)
- problem of incommensurability
- immoral preferences
- non-rational preferences
- no community valuation
What are the problems with sum ranking?
- value-free interpersonal comparison of utilities impossible
- no distributive justice
- how to count future gens?
- how to determine number of people? (some say average utility instead of total utility, but this also has nasty implications)
- how to count animals?
- over-demandingness
What is rule utilitarianisim?
A modified version of utilitarianism designed to mitigate the problems of consequentialism. It states that utilitarianism should only be used to formulate rules. Rules should generally lead to more welfare. Think of lying example.
What is extra welfarism and the capability approach?
It aims to tackle the problems of welfarism. They are modified version of welfarism. Sen proposed the capability approach, which sees consequences is much broader terms, including the value of freedom or disvalue of violated rights. In particular, capabilities are important, and should be included in the welfare calculation (think of bike example).
What are the three economic perspectives on the ‘good market system’?
- Free market perspective of the neoliberal school
- The perfect market perspective of the neoclassical school
- The welfare-state perspective of the Keynesian school
What are the main ideas of the free market perspective by neoliberals?
- Main scholars are Hayek, Schumpeter and Friedman.
- The idea is a market free from government regulations, gov should only protect property rights, minimal social safety net.
- Idea that innovation (new goos, tech etc…) drives economic growth, rather than just competition of who can produce things most cheaply.
- Monopoly is fine if due to skill, cannot be used to keep others from joining the market. This creates a threat for monopolists to keep innovating (Schumpeter)
- At first Friedman was supportive of competition policies by gov but then concluded it was too corrupt, and turned completely against it, like Hayek.
What is the perfect market perspective of the neoclassical school?
- This is the mainstream economic science idea.
- The ideal market would be a market free from imperfections.
- Economic growth is dictated by the price mechanism, leading to equilibrium between supply and demand.
- They use Pareto optimality as a criterion for what is good. Also called minimal benevolence. This criterion also assumes consequentialism and welfarism. It is highly biased towards the status quo (there is no free lunch)
- Gov should be limited to providing public goods and combating market imperfections.
What is the first welfare theorem?
The theorem upon which the ideal of the perfect market was formed. It states that any perfectly competitive market equilibrium is Pareto optimal.
What is the second welfare theorem?
It answers the moral criticism to the first theorem (unjust distributions). It states that every Pareto optimum can be obtained as a competitive general equilibrium, given some distribution of initial endowments.
What are the conditions required for perfect competition?
- No gov regulation (or others) of prices, quantities or quality
- Many market agents with not entry/exit barriers
- All firms in a market produce homogeneous goods, perfectly substitutable
- Full information
- No externalities
- Rationality
Thus, there are 6 possible market imperfections.