Piaget's Development Theory Flashcards

1
Q

How our thinking skills change as we grow older

A

Cognitive Development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In Piaget’s theory, children go through the same stages in the same fixed order for every child

A

Invariant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Children go through the same stages everywhere, no matter different cultures and/or experiences

A

Universal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Children learn by developing mental models of the world and how to react to it

A

Schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When new information is fit into an existing schema

A

Assimilation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When new information does not fit into an existing schema causing the schema to be changed or a new one to be made

A

Accommodation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sensori-motor Stage

A

0-2 歳
・infant used its senses and movement to explore the world
・infant develops a 「body schema」 - - > recognises it exists
・infants attains 『object permanence』 - - > it learns that objects it can’t see are still there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pre-operational Stage

A

2-7 歳
・『animism』- - > thinking inanimate objects have feelings, eg teddy’s hurt etc
・『egocentrism』- - > thinking others can see, think and feel in the same way they do/ everyone experiences the world in the same way I do - - > shown in the 「Three Mountains 」task
・『symbolic thinking』- - > words represent objects, a box represents a car etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Concrete operational Stage

A

7-11 歳
・child is able to 『de-centre』- - > see things from another’s point of view and think about more than one factor at the same time
・child develops 『conservation』- - > knows that quantity stays the same when the appearance changes : length, number etc
・the child develops 『reversibility』- - > can think/act out a problem in reverse to solve it
・the child also achieves 『seriation』(arranging things in order) and 『linguistic humour』(word jokes/puns)

【this is a joke】

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Formal operational Stage

A

11+ 歳
・problems are solved using 『abstract thinking』- - > in your head without needing paper or objects to solve them
・problems are solved in 「systematic」, scientific ways - - > testing one variable at a time
・「hypothetical」thinking - - > considering things you have no experience of eg, you have been hit by a truck and have been isekaied into a generic jrpg world where everyone to some extent can use magic and you can too apparently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criticism 1

A

・the stages are not as fixed or as rigid as Piaget said - - > some studies have shown that some children achieve object permanence or de-centre at a younger age
๑ thinking doesn’t develop in the same way for children everywhere eg, aboriginal children attain concrete operational thinking earlier - - > thought to be useful for survival
๑ nearly half of the adults in somestudues fail to show abstract thinking - - > since they haven’t reached the formal operational stage, the theory isn’t 「universal」
๑​ Piaget only focused on logical thinking - - > he ignored other kinds of thinking eg, creative thinking
๑​ Piaget only describes the kinds of thinking a child can and can’t do - - > he doesn’t explain how the changes in think occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Criticism 2

A

・Piaget’s theory can be called 「reductionist」- - > he doesn’t take into account that teaching can affect cognitive development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Seriation

A

Being able to arrange things in order by eg, height, width etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Abstract thinking

A

Solving problems in your head without needing pen and paper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hypothetical thinking

A

Being able to consider things you have never experienced eg, 魔法力

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Systematic

A

Testing one variable at a time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

De-centre

A

Being able to see something from a different point of view

18
Q

Conservation

A

Knowing that the quantity of something is still the same even if its appearance changes

19
Q

Reversibility

A

Being able to think or act out a problem in reverse to solve it

20
Q

Linguistic humour

A

Take a guess at what this is

21
Q

Animism

A

Thinking inanimate objects have feeling in the same way we do

22
Q

Egocentrism

A

My perspective is the only perspective

23
Q

Symbolic thinking

A

Words representing objects or maybe a box representing a car

24
Q

Body schema

A

私がいるのは知ってる

Recognising your own existence

25
Q

Object permanence

A

Even if I can’t see something, it’s still there

26
Q

Cognitive development

A

How our thinking changes as we get older

27
Q

Invariant

A

Children go through the same cognitive stages in the same fixed order - - > they don’t vary

28
Q

Universal

A

Children go through the same stages, no matter where they are in the world/ different cultures and experiences

29
Q

Schemas

A

Mental models that we use to identify things and so we know how to react to them. It’s how we learn

30
Q

Assimilation

A

When new information is fitted into an already existing schema

31
Q

Accommodation

A

When new information doesn’t fit into an existing schema, you 『accommodate』for it by changing an existing schema or making a new one

32
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservative of number

   Background / hypothesis
A

・Piaget created many tasks to find out when children had acquired different forms of conservation

๑ Hypothesis : children in the concrete operational stage will be able to conserve and children in the Pre-operational stage will not

33
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

     Design
A

・natural experiment - - > the independent variable (age) varied naturally
・independent measures design - - > each child in each age group was only tested once
・cross-sectional study - - > he tested children of different ages

34
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

Sample

A

・a small of Swiss children from Geneva (the actual size of the sample wasn’t reported)
・it included Piaget’s own children

35
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

Materials / apparatus

A

・counters

36
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

          Procedure
A

・each child was shown two rows of counters, equally spaced
・the child was asked if there were the same number of counters in each row
・then one of the rows was spread out and the same question was asked again

37
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

         Results
A

・3-4 year olds (in the pre-operational stage) mostly said that the spread out row had more
counters
・a few 5-6 year olds (at the end of the pre-operational stage) said that they both still had the same number, but they were unable to explain their thinking
・most concrete operational children successfully stated that both rows still had the same number, and they were able to explain why they thought this

38
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

          Conclusion
A

・the results supported Piaget’s hypothesis that conservation of number is acquired at the start of the concrete operational stage

39
Q

Piaget (1952) - Conservation of number

         Criticisms
A

・the sample was culturally biased - - > he only tested Swiss school children. Children from
other countries might have been affected by different education and upbringing, so the
findings can’t be generalised to all cultures
・as a lab experiment it had low ecological validity - - >it was an artificial situation which
might not make sense: why did the adults change one row? When a later experiment got
a ‘naughty teddy’ to re-arrange a row of sweets, 60% of pre-operational children passed
the conservation test
・Piaget asked the same question twice, before and after re-arranging the counters. This
made children think there must be a different answer, so their response might have been
due to demand characteristics rather than being unable to conserve. When the question
was only asked once after re-arranging the row, many more children got the right answer

40
Q

Third stage

A

Concrete operational

41
Q

Second stage

A

Pre-operational

42
Q

Fourth stage

A

Formal operational stage