plair Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

rooney

re delegetion

A

have to look at wording of statute, if is re council tax or planning permission, cannot delegate
- Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973: ss.56-57. - local authorities in most circumsatnces can delegate.
Caltona principle- officials are allowed to act as the alter egos of ministers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jerry Cottals (illegality)

A

case regarding irrelvent consideration on moral grounds regarding live performing animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

dundee harbour case

A

re improper pruposes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

unlawful fettering

A

when are not deciding on a case by case basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Salah Abdadou v Secretary of State for the Home Department

1998 SC 504

A

re unlawful fettering of their discretion by ridgidly appying a policy in certain marriage cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Unlawful delegation

Vine v National dock labour board

A

court decided thata the dismissal of a dock worker was invalid becasue the board instead of deciding the matter themselves sent it to a disciplicary committee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FAilure to take account of relevent matters city cabs case

A

court reduced decision of a local auhtority to increase the number of taxi lsicences granted on the ground thta it had failed to take into account relevent considerations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

tension between neeed for transparency and keeping security services accountable but also to allow them to do job properly

A

greenpeace case- had relationships and children- too far

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Malone v UK

A

had committed a few crimes, notices mail being opened and noise on phone line. govenrment said we will not confirm or deny and we will not disclose any info- there was no framwork. apply the three part test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

prescribed by law

A

in malone case, this showed was no framework- ECtHR said the law must be clear to prevent arbitariyness, give citezens an idea about condition which PA use their powers in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Post Malone

A

SEcurity service acct 1989- put MI5 on statutory footing while keeping it under authority of home secretary
Intelligence and services act 1994- places MI6 and GCHQ on statutory footing- established Intelligence and secuirty comittee (ISC)
Regulation of investiagtory powers act 2000- regulation of communication interception and esatblishes the invetigatory powers tribunal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2013 justice and secuirty act

A

increases powers of ISC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Officail secrest act

A

provides for an absolute ban on unauthorised disclosures of informtaion by memebrs of agencies- secrecy duty is lifelong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

investigatory powers bill 2016- snoopers charter

A

widens govt power to intercept communications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intelligence security committee

A

examines policy expendidture and operations of the secuirty services. meetins are secret, annual report laid down before PM who can make reductions i.e. if soemthing is included which could be dangerous to national security. report on to parliament but govenrment can delete and keep secret certain bits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

investigatory powers tribunal

A

established under section 65 RIPA
investiagtes complaintes by individuals about agencies conduct towards them an possible interception of communications
is only approporate tribuanl in regarsd to section 7 HRA- that anyone can bring claim agaiasnt tribunal ect if they have acted unlawfully) ]
decisions are unappealabel and usually not subject to judicail review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do tribuanals answer.

A
  • say you have been monitered unlawfully

- non-determination- either lawfulll y or not at a;;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Kennedy case

A

brought to courts using art 6 that the proceedings held in private was a breach art 6- held that as a qualaified rigth it could be restricted in cases on national security - uk govt know better than starsbourg what issues will be so should make decision adequatly

19
Q

SNowdon case

GCHQ could;

A

activate devieces microphone or webcam
identfy location of device
log keystrokes
enourmous bredth of power with no real ssafeguards agaisnt unlawful use of information

20
Q

Liberty v Secuirty services

A

first case of a sucessful determination made by the IPTribuanl - found violation of art 8 as the processes used were not prescribed by law

21
Q

Privacy International case

A

Tribuanl held that thematic warrents (i.e. can hack all of phones in edinburgh) is lawful under UK law and convention rights

22
Q

Boddington case

A

charged with smoking on the railway, said law was ultra vires- it is a defence to say that the way the law has been made by a local authorryt is ultra vires as defence for a criminal case

23
Q

consulation of local authorities

A

thsi si a duty in good faith, must issue consultation paper, saying reasons what are alternitives and why not using them, must give reaosnable time to consider then issue response doc. due process not folloewed recently with regards to tax credits issue- time limit that has developed is 4 weeks
if are flaws in conssultation but wouldve come to same conclusion anyway, courst unlikly to quash

24
Q

Metalcraft case

A

even if the legislation is not printed it is still valid, parliamentary record is public so you are expected to know, not a defence to plead ignorance, oarticuarly in last 2 months were HMSO no longer asa rule print everything

25
Breach of EU law
European communities act section 2- necessary gateway into the legal system- factortame- need dissaply law if contravenes EU law robbie the pict v Kingston- re sky bridge
26
Sadurski in 'freedom f speech and its limits
'human communicative actions are crucial to our capacity for self expression and self fufillment
27
Barendt- freedome of speech
a right to express beleifs reflects what it is to be human
28
only was remedy of a breach of confidence at common law
should not have been widly avaliable to the public it was confidential information discussed in Kaye case re hospiital brakin of well known actor
29
spycatcher case
above could be extended to anyone who has notice of the dicuments confidentiality beginisgs of the misuse of private information tort- ask- did claiment reasonably beleive his privacy to be respected
30
peck v UK
deemed to be breach of art 8 as the the exposure went far beyond what the claiment would reasonable expected- re suicide attampt
31
Von Hannover
higher test than campbell- said media breached her legitimate expectation to not have privacy ifrnged - no pub lic interest
32
spycatcher case
wished prevent MI% officer publishing meoirs- failed as was greater public interst- formed background fro the official secrets act 1989
33
OFSA
s.1 criminal offence if for any purpose predjudicail to safety of the state - enters prohibited complec preapes information fo rthe enemy obtains or passes on information that may be useful ie. the conviction of protestors approaching an airway with intention to hold a sit in on the runway was upheld in DPP v Chalmers in reations to s.1-4 public defecne is not a defecne
34
R v SHayler
tried argue public interest as a defecne- held did not contraven art 10
35
Snyder v Phelps- US case
were allowed to pcket funeral- said they do not want to stifle public debate
36
in UK different approach - DPP v HAmmon
conviction for man holding displasy saying stop gays
37
restiction
must be necessary and must meet a presssing social need and should be propertionat eto a legitmate aim
38
offences contrary to OSA
offence for crown servent ect to make an unauthorised disclose of information about security defence or international relations- max sentance - 2 years
39
10(1)
everyoen ahs right to freedom expression- opinions and impart idea
40
10(2)
may be subject to formatlisites restrictions such are prescribed by law, necessary in democrtaic society and pursue legitmarte aim ect
41
Public interest disclosure act 1998
allows individuals who make dsclosures of infomration in the public interest- a qualifying disclsure is if it shows - a crimianl offence is or is going to be comitted - person has fialed or is likly to fail to comply with any legal obligations - is miscarriadge of justice
42
if don't know
section 1(5) this si a defence
43
section 1(3)
OSA if are crown servent ect
44
section 5(1)
disclose information