PMHP Flashcards

(131 cards)

1
Q

d3mft

A

obvious decay into dentine of tooth (using visual methods only)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 fluoride population level deliveries

A

water fluoridation
fluoridated salt
fluoridated milk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

components of clinical governance

6

A

Risk management
Education
Audit
Research
Clinical effectiveness
Openess

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

audit cycle

A

identify topic and set standards
obeserve practise and collect data
analyse data
implement changes
re-audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PICO

A

population
intervention
comparison
outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RCT aspects

A

blinding of particpants and researchers
random allocation - computer generated
preordained outcome measures
inclusion and exclusion criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Risk ratio value of no difference

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

absolute risk difference value of no difference

A

0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

things to consider when analysing a study

A

size of study
duration of study
population investigated in study

confounding variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

clinical governance

A

systematic approach to maintaing and improving the standard of pt care in a health system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

dimensions of healthcare

6

A

Pt centered
Efficient
Equitable
Effective
Timely
Safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 dimensions of healthcare in NHS dental services

A

primary care - general practice and public dental service
secondary care - hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CPD hours in 5 year cycle

A

100 verifiable hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CPD core subjects

A

10 medical emegency
5 radiology and radiation protection
5 decontamination and disinfection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

GDC standards

A
  1. Put pt interests first
  2. communicate effectively with pt
  3. obtain valid consent
  4. protect pt inforamtion
  5. have a clear and easy complaints procedure
  6. work with colleagues in pt best interests
  7. maintain, develop and work within own skills
  8. raise concerns if pt are at risk
  9. behave professionally and maintain protect confidence in you and the profession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

pillars of ethics

A
  1. non malicence
  2. beneficence
  3. justice
  4. pt autonomy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

negligence

A

omission to do something which a reasonable practitioner would do, or doing something which a reaonsable practitioner would not do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how long should notes be kept for

A

10 years
or until child is 25

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

notes should be

7

A

confidential
accurate
legilible
complete
retrievable
current
retained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

who is on the GDC board

A

1 chair
6 dental professionals
6 lay people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

audit

A

quality improvement process that seeks to improve pt care and outcomes through systematic review of care against explicit criteria and the implementation of change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

uses of audit

A

observe gaps in knowledge
learning
attitudes
protocol
training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

audit cycle

A

identify problem and set standard
observe practice and collect data
analyse data
compare with set standards
implement change and re audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

factors that make up consent

A

informed
valid
capacity
voluntary
non-manipulative
non-coerced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
discuss prior to consent
knowledge of purpose of tx risks and beneftis fo tx alternatives no tx - risks and benefits success rate
26
valid consent | 3
recently obtained specific to tx remains current/continuous
27
legal consent
have capacity has information made and communicated freely - non coerced, non manipulated
28
study that gives highest level of evidence
systematic review of RCTs cochrane review
29
4 aspects of RCTs
randomised inclusion/exclusion criteria control blinding
30
cohort study
prospective type of longitudinal study—an approach that follows research participants over a period of time often share a characteristc
31
case control study
retrospective observational study. It looks at 2 sets of participants. One group has the condition you are interested in (the cases) and one group does not have it (the controls). In other respects, the participants in both groups are similar.
32
case studt
one pt detailed study of a specific subject
33
incidence
number of new cases over a specific time
34
prevalance
nummber of cases at a time
35
SIMD
scottish index of multiple depreivation - area based tool for identifying area of poverty and inequality across scotland to support policy and decision making ranks in order of dep (1 is most dep)
36
factors influenceing deprivation
unemployment/employment status income housing education access to healtcare enviorment crime
37
Adults with incapcaity act 2000 | principles
Benefit Minimal intervention Wishes of pt Others consulted Residual capacity
38
Capacist
Assess option Make decision Communicate decision Understand decision Retain memory of decsision
39
who can consent under AWI 2000
welfare POA welfare guardianship or need section 47 certificate signed by adequately trained person
40
adv of split mouth design
both control and intervention exposed to same evironment
41
disadv of split mouth design
pt cannot be blinded
42
confidence interval
representation fo study findings to real world propulation worked out using the effect size and the sample size relative to the true population 95% likelihood of repeat results
43
p-value
statistical significance of results, usually null hypotheses <0.05 is significant?
44
aetiology of DFA
parent/peer output media pain expectation previous negative experience uneducated on modern techniques
45
anxious presentation
negative low pain threshold/flinching fidgets sweating needing to go to toilet/making excuses lack eye contact
46
cycle of behaviour change
precontemplation contemplation preparation action maintenance with progress or relapse at any stage
47
management techniques for anxious pts
densensitisation acclimatisation CBT progressive relaxation tell show do mediaction - anxiolytic meds or sedation distraction control
48
primary appraisal in stress
initial assessment of stressor 1 - irrelevant 2 - benign 3 - harmful/threat 4 - harmful/challenge
49
seondary appraisal in stress
reaction to primary appraisal 1 - harm 2 - resistance 3 - exhaustaion
50
reponses to stress
direct action, seek information, do nothing or coping
51
burnout
disengagment and exhaustation often negative and dissatisfied (
52
coping mechanisms for stress
work life balance exercise education on stress set own goals know own limits
53
recommend alcohol per week
14units 2 alchol free days 2-3 units per day
54
screen for alcholoism
CAGE cut down annoyed at critisim/aggressive guilty early morning drinking
55
alcohol intervantion
FRAMES Feedback Responsibilty Advice Menu of options Empathetic Self efficacy
56
smoking pack years
20/day is 1 pack year number per day/years
57
smoking intervention
5As Ask Advise Assist Assess Arrange
58
sharing/disclosing info when
**Consent from the patient**: patient provides explicit consent for the disclosure of their information, the dentist is allowed to share the relevant information with the specified party or parties. **Legal requirement**: e.g in response to a court order, subpoena, or other legal processes. Disclose only the minimum necessary information required by law and should seek legal advice if in doubt. **Public interest:** compelling reason to believe that the disclosure of patient information is necessary to protect public health or prevent serious harm to others e.g cases of serious communicable diseases or instances where the patient poses a risk to the safety of others. **Safeguarding concerns**: concerns about a patient's safety or suspects abuse, they may be required to disclose confidential information to social services or the police, in order to protect the patient or others **Clinical audit or research:** done in a way that protects patient confidentiality e.ganonymizing or aggregating the data so that individual patients cannot be identified. **Sharing information with other healthcare professionals**: involved in the patient's care, such as physicians, specialists, or other members of the dental team. Done on a need-to-know basis, and the shared information should be relevant to the patient's treatment or care.
59
consent not required when
Emergency arises in clinical setting and it is not possible to find out pt wishes * Tx you provide must be least restrictive for pt future needs for as long as the px lacks capacity, you should provide ongoing care and if the patient regains capacity then explain what has been done and why
60
non technical reasons for adverse events
team management team working situration awareness decsision making 70% rest are clinical and structural factors
61
diversity
acknowledgment of alterity amoung people in terms of their community, culture, beliefs, life experiences and individuality
62
equality
faireness of oppurtunity and observing the rights of people to do so
63
equity
tx people justly, which doesnt mean tx everyone the same - those with an unfair disadvantage may required additional aid - quality of being fair and impartial
64
disabled person
has a physical or mental impairment the impairment has a substantial and long term adverse effect on their ability to carry out nornmal daily activities | DDA 2004
65
protected characteristics
age gender - identity, expression, reassignment sexual orientation marital status disabilty race pregnancy or materinity religious belif | equality act 2010
66
categories of discrimination
direct indirect associative perceived harrasment victimisation instruction to discrimination
67
oral cavity cancer areas
lip tongue gum FOM palate
68
oropharyngeal cancer areas
base of tongue lingual tonsil tonsil oropharynx pharynx
69
OCC incidence
More common in males by far Incidence rises around 45 yrs, peaks around 70 Far more common in deprived areas Oral cancers * Males 1.8 times more likely * 65-70 yrs 3.7 times more likely than younger * SIMD 1 2.7 times more likely
70
risk factors for oral cancer | 7
**Smoking** (if never drank, 2.13 times more likely) – duration worse than high quantity * More laynx **Alcohol** (if never smoked, 2.04 times more likely) – quantity worse than duration * More oral cavity/pharynx * Alcohol reduction in cancer risk emerges after 20 years Interaction: PAR for tobacco and alcohol = 72% (61 - 79) * 4% alcohol alone, 33% tobacco alone, and 35% combined **Genetics** **Diet/BMI ** **Oral health **and dental care **Socioeconomic** status **HPV 16 and 18 are ocogenic** * 25% oral cancer HPV infection, 80% oropharyngeal caner
71
smoking and perio
Anerobic bacteria high in smokers (p.ging, t.denticola) Delayed wound healing Vasoconstriction - mask gingival irritation Impaired chemotaxis of immune cells Cytokine production reduced Enzyme catlase prodcution effected - bone loss higher CAL stain teeth
72
benefits of quitting smoking | 4
**Initial reduction in MI risk after 24hrs**, then continues to drop * Drop to ½ that of a smoker at a year * 15 years same risk as someone not smoked **Improvement in respiratory health within 72hrs** (bronchial tubes reduced inflammation) Improvement in lung function 1-9months (cilia regrowth) **Reduction in cancer after 2-5years (1/2 of active smoker)** – oral and lung Reduction to never smoker in 20years **48hrs improvement in sense of smell and taste**
73
negligence claims have a basis when
Duty of care was owed, the duty was breached (standard of care), that breach caused or materially contributed to damage (causation), the damage was reasonably foreseeable and had negative consequences and effects
74
key principles of EBD
Ask Align Acquire Appraise Apply
75
PICO
population intervention comparison outcome
76
case report/ series
Report on a single pt/series of pts with an outcome of interest disadv - No control used Can be used to ID new disease outcomes and generate hypotheses
77
case-control stude
Study involving people with a disease and a suitable control group of people without disease, look back in time to a particular risk factor in both groups and can be used to look at potential cause of disease Confounding bias, recall/selection bias, selection of controls, time relationships
78
case-control study
Study involving people with a disease and a suitable control group of people without disease, look back in time to a particular risk factor in both groups and can be used to look at potential cause of disease dusadv - Confounding bias, recall/selection bias, selection of controls, time relationships
79
cross sectional study
An observation of a defined population at a single point in time (or time interval) Exposure and outcome are determined and measures at the same time Used to estimate disease prevalence and to investigate potential risk factors disadv - Causality, confounding bias and recall bias
80
cohort study
Used to measure exposure in an established group of individuals that develop disease (outcome of interest) Estimate incidence and investigate cause of disease, determine prognosis and timing and direction of events disadv - Controls difficult to identify, confounding bias, difficulty blinding, very expensive/time consuming, large numbers required (difficult for rare diseases)
81
RCT
clinical trial - GOLD standard for effectiveness and efficacy specification of particpants (inc/excl criteria), control randomisation and blinding diadv - difficult to design and conduct, not suitable for all research questions
82
systematic review or meta-analysis
compiling data from multiple RCTs most scietifically sound form of research paper as results from mutliple different papers investigating same topic are collated, noted and analysed
83
absolute risk
incidence of disease amoungst people exposed to agent, assumes no risk to those not exposed
84
attibutable risk
difference between incidence rates in exposed and non-exposed groups, risks attributes to factor being investigated
85
relative risk
ratio of incidence in exposed group Vs non-exposed group measurement of proportionate/realtive inc in disease rates of exposed groups makes allowance for frequency of disease amoungst people not exposed to harmful agent
86
risk factor
environmental, behavioural or biological factor (confirmed by temporal sequence), usually increasing the probability of a disease occurring and if absent/removed, reduces probability
87
causative agent
external factor which results in disease in susceptible individuals
88
determinant
Attribute/circumstance which affects the liability of an individual to be exposed or when exposed to develop disease
89
confounding variable
minor variable which is left uncontrolled which may/may not have an effect on results
90
absolute risk difference
difference risk between groups value of no difference ARD=0 indicating no benefit/risk to either group * E.g. ARD 2.2 [-1.1 to 3.3] = not statistically significant as it overlaps 0; ARD 3.5 [1.1-6.0] = statistically significant as it doesn’t overlap 0 * When CI overlaps 0 indicates insufficient evidence for a difference between tx and control groups (evidence not statistically significant)
91
confidence interval
Range of values that the ARD will take in population 95% of time will contain true mean overlaps the 'value of no difference' between treatments indicates that there is insufficient evidence for a difference between the treatment and control group in the population
92
number needed to treat
Number of pts that have to be trated to prevent ne pt from developing the disease/condition/outcome 1/ARD
93
risk ratio is
robability of outcome in exposed group Vs probability of outcome in nonexposed group **Value of no difference is 1 ** E.g. RR 2.2 [1.1-3.3] = statistically significant as it doesn’t overlap 1; RR 1.5 [0.3-3.6]=not statistically significant as it does overlap 1 Sufficient evidence if CI do not overlap 1
94
types of epidemilogical study | 3
descriptive analytical interventional/experimental
95
key roles of epidemiology | 4
measure amount of disease meansure distribution of disease measure distribution of natural history of disease assess peoples risk of disease, healthcare needs, assessment and service planning
96
prevalence
number of diseases cases in population at a given time estimates can be obtained from cross-sectional studies or derived from registers
97
incidence
number of new disease cases developing over a specific period of time in a defined population estimates can be obtained from longitudinal studies or derviced from registers
98
properties of ideal index | 6
Clear and unambiguous Objective Reproducible Not time consuming Acceptable to pt Amendable to statistical analysis
99
healthpromotion framework 4 strategy types
Framework 1. Identify needs and priorities 2. Set aims and objectives 3. Decide best ways to achieve the aims 4. Identify resources 5. Plan evaluation methods 6. Set an action plan 7. ACTION – implement plan Upstream policy – public place smoking ban, sugar tax Midstream policy – dental health support workers, social prescribing Downstream policy – chair side clinical prevention, smoking cessation services Common risk factor approach - addresses risk factors common to many chronic conditions within the context of the wider socio-environmental milieu. Oral health is determined by diet, hygiene, smoking, alcohol use, stress and trauma.
100
symptoms of smoking withdrawl
irritability, depression, restless, poor concentration, inc appetite (weight gain), sleep disruption, light headedness
101
e-cigs
stimulate tobacco smoking through vaporised nicotine delivery without burning conventional tobacco Adv – thought to be less toxic, successful in helping quit smoking as hand-to-mouth habit maintained as well as psychosocial aspect of addiction Disadv – no long term studies so effects unknown, possible gateway to smoking/renormalisation of it Only advised to current smokers that are trying to quit
102
resilience
process of adapting well in the face of adversity, trauma, tragedy and threats
103
general dental service people | 3
principals associates traning grades (VT)
104
public dental service people | 4
dental officers senior dental officers specialist dental officers clincal directors/chief administrative dental officers (island boards)
105
secondary care (hospitals) people | 4
core training training grades (inc higher specialisty trainees) associate specialists/speciliast dentists consultants
106
vulnervable child | 3
under 5 medically compromised irregular attenders (only in pain)
107
signs of non-accidental injury | 5
* Symmetrical * Triangle of danger or involving ears/eyes * Story doesn’t match up/keeps changing * Different injuries at different points of healing * Delay in seeking help
108
child abuse needs to be | 3
significant harm carer has responsibilty for harm significant connection between carer and harm to child
109
categories of child abuse | 5
physical emotional sexual neglect non-nutritional failure to thrive
110
UN convention on the rights of child 1989
Respected Informed Protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation Secure - be and feel Start in life Say in life
111
Child and Young Peoples act 2014
GIRFEC – shared approach * Named person for every child for single point of contact SHANARRI wellbeing wheel * Safe, health, active, nurtured, achieving, respected, responsible, included
112
protection of children (scotland) act 2003
PVG - list individuals unsuitable to work with children
113
national guidance for child protection in scotland
See * Injury * Mark * Bruise * Presentation – dirty, clothing * Parent behaviour – hostile, aggressive to you, staff, child Hear * Parent interacts with child * Comment in waiting rooms * Told * Third hand DOING NOTHING IS NOT AN OPTION
114
management of child neglect
One department – preventative dental team management Multi department – involving health visitor, GP, school Referral to child protection department Voice concerns to parent – don’t blame Offer support – OHI help, money concerns Set targets Record in notes what have seen, heard or been told using the exact words. Immediate danger -> Police: child protection removal and fill in form after(e.g.hit, illegal 2020)
115
referring and recording child protection issues or dom abuse issues
Discuss immediately with senior if available Notification of concern (NOC) Tell pt, unless cannot get hold of or immediate danger Duty SW (social work) Advice and support Role of wider health team (healthcare visitors) Recording of concerns and actions Outcome from NOC Dissent form decision made- seek advice Domestic Abuse – NICE guidelines; NHS Gender Based Violence Action Plan
116
vulnerable adult
unable to safeguard their own interests through disability, metnal disorder, illness or physical or mental infirmity, and who is at risk of harm or self-harm, including neglect” Adult support and protection (Scotland) Act 2007 Consider whether a referral needs to be made on their behalf
117
AVDR
ask validate document refer | adult support and protection act 2007
118
short term effects of child neglect
physical health emotional health social and cognitive development
119
long term effects of child neglect
mental health problems - major depression suicide substance abuse heart disease and diabetes jail
120
adverse childhood experiences
potentially traumatic events that occur in childhood (0-17 years). For example: experiencing violence, abuse, or neglect. witnessing violence in the home or community.
121
dental neglect
persistent failure to meet childs basic oral health needs, resulting in serious impairment in the child’ oral health and general health * Failure/delay to present (obvious dental disease) * Impact on child – bullied, sleep disturbance, disturbed eating * Care offered but child not returned
122
sharps injury management
apply pressure and allow to bleed wash don't scrub assess type of injury risk assess source of blood establish contact - occupational health, datix AWARE
123
spikes protocol
setting perception invitation knowledge empathy summary and strategy breaking bad news
124
fluoride and caries
dose response relationship with caries reduction
125
F varnsih
22600ppm 4xyearly
126
water fluoridation
1ppm
127
toothpaste for 0-3
smear 1000ppm
128
toothpaste 3-6
1450ppm pea
129
toothpaste 10+ high risk
2800ppm pea 0.619% sodium fluorride
130
toothpaste 16+ high risk
5000ppm pea 1.1% soidum fluoride
131
fluoride mouthwash
225ppm 0.05% sodium fluoride | at least 6+ need to be able to rinse and spint