Pmsf, SV, CO Flashcards

(68 cards)

1
Q

Pmsf

A

Mean Systemic Filling Pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of Pmsf

A

System‐wide equilibrated pressure after cardiac arrest (usually about 10–15mmHg)
o Very similar to postcapillary venous pressure in an animal with a beating heart
o Represented by P1 in Flow = (P1-P2)/R, R = resistance to flow (Ohm’s Law)
o Rewritten: as venous return = (Pmsf – CVP)/venous resistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Three methods for determining Pmsf

A
  1. Inspiratory Hold Maneuver
  2. Mathematical Modeling
  3. Tourniquet Technique
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inspiratory Hold Maneuver

A

series of inspiratory hold maneuvers at Paw 5, 15, 25, 35 cmH2O + simultaneous CVP, CO measurements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tourniquet Technique

A

rapidly inflating tourniquet (to provide stop-flow event) applied to appendage with preplaced AC or VC attached to pressure-measuring device
 20-30s: ABP, VBP equilibrated – pressure ~ Pmsf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Use of Pmsf

A

Characterizes functional status of circulating blood volume, identify hypovolemic patients who would benefit from fluid therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Measurements Obtained Using Pmsf

A

Venous return (assumed = CO), Pmsf, CVP measurements used to calculate venous resistance

total systemic compliance calculated from a known volume load, pre/post‐Pmsf measurements.

Functional estimate of Pmsf, circulating BV derived from fact that PPV impedes intrathoracic venous return, diastolic heart filling, SV

Magnitude of SV decrease by PPV used as index of central blood volume
–Magnitude of thoracic BF impairment depends on peak Paw, inspiratory time, cycle rate (essentially pulse pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Magnitude of decrement in SV assessed by:

A

 Systolic blood pressure
 Mean blood pressure
 Pulse pressure (systolic – diastolic pressure)
 Digital evaluation of pulse quality (area under pulse pressure waveform)
 Plethysmographic monitoring of area under PP waveform, caused by inflating lung

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Limitations of Pmsf

A

Only intended for use in patients with normal lungs, closed chest
 Diffuse disease decreases compliance (change in V/change in P) – diminishes transfer of pressure from airways to pleural space – diminishes magnitude of thoracic blood flow impairment to given ventilator pressure setting

Area under pulse pressure waveform decrements of >10–13% were reported to predict hypovolemia and fluid bolus responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stroke Volume Measurements

A
  1. Estimation by Doppler
  2. Area under PP waveform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SV: Doppler measurements

A

o Ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (EDD), ventricular end‐systolic diameter (ESD) measured; end‐diastolic volume (EDV), end‐systolic volume (ESV) calculated
o SV calculated as difference btw EDV, ESV
o Calculated by measuring flow velocity through structure (often aortic valve) of known diameter
o CT, MRI - primarily research tools in anesthetized patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SV: Area under PP waveform - partial correlation: qualitative characterization

A

 Tall wide (bounding) pulse likely associated with large SV
 Short, narrow or thready pulse likely associated with small SV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arterial Compliance

A

At given arterial compliance, assoc btw change in area under PP wave form, SV
 Basis for most cardiac output measuring devices
 When compliance or impedance changes, qualitative relationship btw PP waveform, SV also changes

Commercial measurement devices usually require intermittent resetting of computation constant to account for changes in compliance, flow impedance DT retrograde reflected pressure waves over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cardiac Output

A

vol of blood ejected from each ventricle per minute, L/min, product of HR*SV
o CI = cardiac index, CO/BSA or BW – L/min/m2 or L/min/kg
o Summarizes in single value contribution of CV system to global DO2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Advantages of CO Monitoring

A

monitoring hemodynamic changes, assessing effectiveness of fluid responsiveness
o Trends > actual values, ‘functional CO monitoring’ – positive response = acute increase 20-25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

5 Primary Variables of CO

A

o HR
o Rhythm
o Preload
o Contractility
o Afterload

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Basic Principles of CO Measurement

A

o Results obtained must be of clinical relevance to patient
o Data obtained must be sufficiently accurate
o Therapeutic intervention must improve outcome
o Patient’s BP: important, complementary info

Low CO in hypotensive patient: hypovolemia, decreased cardiac function
High CO in hypotensive patient: decreased SVR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which is the only technique that allows for direct CO measurement?

A

electromagnetic flowmetry

Requires sx implantation of flow probe circumferentially to main PA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Fick’s Principle for CO

A

1870 – first technique to measure CO
o Measurement of CaO2, CvO2, O2 consumption
 Measurement of O2 consumption = limitation of technique, requires accurate collection/analysis of exhaled gases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the reference standard for CO monitoring?

A

PAC thermodilution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Law of Conservation of Mass and the Fick Principle

A

Law of Conservation of Mass: quantity of O2, CO2 leaving lungs = quantity of gas taken up or expelled by blood flowing in pulmonary circulation
 Limitation: absence of any CP shunting

Requires PA cath for MvB sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Modified Fick Technique

A

estimates for VO2

CO = VO2/(CaO2-CvO2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Indirect Fick Method of Measuring CO: NICO

A

MOA: Elimination of CO2 rather than uptake of O2

Intermittent periods of partial rebreathing – estimates PaCO2, PvCO2 from ETCO2 partial pressure during normal breathing and rebreathing
* VCO2 calculated from minute ventilation, CO2 content
* CaCO2 estimated from ETCO2
*PvCO2 ~ CvCO2 (blood draw)

Essentially CO = (VCO2)/(CVCO2-CaCO2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Equilibrium Point Assoc with Indirect Fick Method

A

CO2 elimination from lungs approaches 0, PvCO2 (end pulmonary capillary blood) = PETCO2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
How estimate cardiopulmonary shunting with indirect Fick principle?
Estimated via FIO2, SpO2
26
Summary of Indirect Fick Principle (NICO Unit)
--Essentially **rate of CO2 elimination proportional to O2 consumption** --CO = rate of CO elimination (ETCO2)/(CvCO2-CaCO2) comparing normal breathing and rebreathing --**Change in CO2 elimination/ETCO2 change IRT rebreathing** --Q3min: rebreathing valve prevents normal volumes of CO2 from being eliminated, patient's inhaled/exhaled gases diverted through NICO loop for 50s --CO2 elimination drops, [CO2] in PA increases but CO unchanged
27
Limitations of NICO
--ETT/CMV – need for constant CO2 removal precludes use in SpV with SA patients --CMV >200mL/kg (12mL/kg so need p >20kg) --Assumes perfect distribution with no shunting --Cumbersome calculations, multiple levels of inaccuracy
28
Advantages of the NICO unit
No PAC No invasive blood gas sampling
29
Accuracy of the NICO/Indirect Fick Principle in Dogs, Horses
* VT 12mL/kg: good correlation with thermodilution, lithium dilution
30
Dye Dilution
o Stewart, Hamilton: estimation of CO by knowing amount of injected indicator, calculating area under dilution curve measured downstream  Same reliability as Fick technique, better suitable in clinical setting  Became accepted method of reference
31
Thermodilution
o Same principles as dye dilution, heat as indicator o Advantage: less accumulation since thermal New gold standard
32
Swan Gantz Catheter
- Catheterization of RH by balloon-tipped catheter --Proximal injection port in RA (~30cm), usually blue - CVP; thermodilution --Proximal infusion port in distal RA (~31cm), - inj drugs, IVF --Balloon: usually red --Thermistor port for thermistor measurements in PA (~4cm) --Distal PA, pressure transducer and MvB sampling
33
MOA Thermodilution
Indicator bolus: sterile saline (known vol, temp) injected into RA via SG PAC – change over time in blood temp in main PA used to calculate CO Changes in blood temp detected by thermistor at distal end of PA catheter Computer acquires thermodilution curve over time Inj 2x, consistent phase of resp cycle – traditionally end of expiration
34
Thermodilution Injectate Characteristics
 High volumes, lower temps: most accurate
35
Stewart Hamilton Equation (Simplified)
CO = (mg of dye injected * 60)/(avg concentration of dye * time)
36
How does CO affect AUC?
CO inversely proportional to derivative of derivative of temp dt  Low CO: bolus diffuses in RV, PA slowly – larger AUC  High CO: bolus diffuses more quickly – smaller AUC
37
Limitations of Dye and Thermodilution Techniques
no real time values, rapid accumulation of indicator clouds results with serial comparisons, cumbersome calibration (dye techniques), significant quantities of blood required for sampling  SG = primarily human products, narrow applicable sizes in vet med
38
Sources of Error with Dye and Thermodilution Techniques
Lower vol injected than entered: smaller AUC, CO falsely high Lower temp: change in temp artificially large, CO falsely low
39
Complications Assoc with PAC Placement
10% human patients – arrhythmias, heart block, rupture of RH/PA, thromboembolism, pulmonary infarction, valvular damage, endocarditis
40
Transpulmonary Thermodilution, US Indicator Dilution: PiCCO, COstatus
Does not require PAC, same basic principles as PAC thermodilution Estimation of CO via central venous, arterial catheter only (dedicated femoral AC)
41
PiCCO
 Inj of ice-cold IVF, **measures changes in temp over time by arterial thermistor tipped catheter in femoral artery**
42
COstatus
**Changes in blood viscosity following inj of small saline bolus (0.5-1mL/kg) warmed to room temp – changes in US velocity, quantified, measured** Roller pump, extracorporeal AV loop btw peripheral AC, distal lumen of CVC **Two reusable sensors: measure change in US velocity, BF through AV loop** SV derived from dilution curves
43
COstatus sensors
1. Venous sensory 2. Arterial sensory
44
Venous sensory for COstatus
inj of saline, records time/vol of inj
45
Arterial Sensory for COstatus
changes in concentration of saline in blood as a dilution, indicator travel time
46
COstatus Accuracy/Limitations
Good agreement in humans, +volumetric variables, no specific equipment for veterinary patients, more user friendly COstatus: accurate, safe in patients <1kg  Restricted to patients <250kg
47
Lithium Dilution (LiDCO)
Dye dilution CO monitoring: IV injection of isotonic lithium chloride (0.002-0.004mmol/kg) as indicator o [Lithium] in blood – lithium selective electrode connected to peripheral AC o Lithium [ ] vs time curve via 4.5mL/min blood draw through disposable sensor  Computer converts voltage signal across lithium-selective membrane to [lithium]
48
Calculation for LiDCO
CO = (LiClx60)/[AUC(1-PCV) **PCV correct bc lithium only distributed in plasma, transform into total BF**
49
Advantages of LiDCO
- As accurate as PAC thermodilution, more accurate when given via central line vs electromagnetic flowmetry (pigs) - Easy to set up, operate - Horses, dogs, pigs cats - Uses lines already present in critically ill patients (inj via peripheral catheter)
50
Disadvantages of LiDCO
- Poor performance in presence of arrhythmias - Interactions btw lithium, some ax drugs (rocuronium)* - Blood loss assoc with withdrawal of arterial blood
51
Other Important Feature with CO Monitoring
ideally would paralyze patients for CO monitoring bc CO affected by resp, better able to standardize
52
Arterial Waveform Analysis
Requires arterial access, estimation of CO by measurement of AUC of pulse wave  Unreliable in dogs, horses PiCCO, LiDCO, other devices
53
PiCCO for Arterial Waveform Analysis
arterial pulse contour analysis  Requires calibration: transpulmonary thermodilution  Repeat calibration needed to obtain adequate estimation of CO, whenever change in vasomotor tone/significant change in patient’s condition calibration prior to CO measurement based on assumption that SV = sum of systolic, diastolic flows Systolic, diastolic flows proportional to systolic, diastolic areas in AP waveform
54
LiDCO for Arterial Waveform Analysis
pulse power analysis for beat to beat estim of CO  Calibration via lithium dilution calibration prior to CO measurement based on assumption that SV = sum of systolic, diastolic flows Systolic, diastolic flows proportional to systolic, diastolic areas in AP waveform
55
Other Devices for Arterial Waveform Analysis
no baseline calibration, empirically calculate SV  Accuracy, precision questionable  Technical difficulties
56
Advantages of Echo/Doppler Based Techniques for CO Measurement
large amt of hemodynamic info obtained – contractility, chamber filling, assessment of valves/pericardium
57
Non-Doppler techniques for CO Measurements
 Based on approximate volumetric reconstructions of LV chamber  Simpson’s rule: LV divided into series of disks stacked from base to apex * LV volume: summing approximated volumes of individual disks * SV: determining difference in vol btw systole, diastole
58
Simpson's Rule for Non-Doppler Measurements of CO
LV divided into series of disks stacked from base to apex * LV volume: summing approximated volumes of individual disks * SV: determining difference in vol btw systole, diastole
59
Disadvantages of Non-Doppler Techniques for Measurement of CO
Disadvantages: time consuming, inadequate for rapid assessment Rarely used clinically
60
Doppler for CO Measurement
Transthoracic, transesophageal – Doppler measurement of flow Doppler Effect: shift in frequency as US beam directed along aorta, part of signal reflected back by moving RBCs at different frequency * Determination of flow velocity
61
MOA Doppler for CO Measurement
measure cross sectional area (CSA) of LVOT, essentially a circle = (pi)r2 * CO = HR x CSA x VTI * VTI = velocity time integral, represents distance that blood travels during one beat, ‘stroke distance’ * Subcostal view for SA – three or four chambered views, perfect parallel alignment of Doppler with LVOT
62
Advantages of Doppler for CO Measurement
Acceptable alternative to thermodilution for clinical purposes
63
Disadvantages of Doppler for CO Measurement
Not appropriate for continuous CO measurements – heat-induced injury Expertise required: veterinary cardiologists, equipment Image quality, sample site, angle of insonation, velocity signal to noise ratio, shape of aortic valve, ability to measure LVOT
64
Bioimpedance
changes in conductivity of high frequency, low magnitude alternating current passing across thorax to derive SV Changes in electrical conductivity produced by variations in intrathoracic blood flow during each cardiac cycle
65
Bioimpedance MOA
Electrodes placed on thorax, neck - small, non-painful current passed btw electrodes, change in voltage (bioimpedance) measured Measurements converted to SV using various equations, algorithms Real time estimation of SV, CO * Measures of thoracic fluid content, LV ejection time, SVR, L cardiac work index
66
Bioreactance
measures changes in frequency of electrical currents  Less prone to noise-derived errors
67
Advantages of Bioimpedance, Bioreactance
non-invasive, quick application
68
Disadvantages of Bioimpedance, Bioreactance
inaccurate in critically ill patients esp in presence of pulmonary edema/pleural effusion; electrical interference  Little to no evidence in vet med  Approximation of chest shape as cylinder, cone for SV determination  Unlikely that human algorithms applicable to veterinary patients