poetry Flashcards
(200 cards)
how to structure essay
- 1 para on language, 1 para on form, 1 para on structure
1. point about both (similarity and/or difference)
2. Evidence technique analysis for poem a
3. 2nd evidence technique analysis (link to reader)
4. comparative sentence to poem b
5. evidence technique analysis for poem b
6. 2nd evidence technique analysis for poem b
london summary
a speaker (could be seen as Blake) is wandering down the streets of london, encountering the plight of poverty and suffering of its citizens. he indicts the abuse of power of the authorities and how their power is not used to benefit society as child labour, prostitution, and corruption permeated London.
London context
- he was a Romantic poet - believed nature was awe-inspiring. he was anti-establishment.
- 2 poetry collections: ‘songs of innocence’ and ‘songs of experience’. this belonged to ‘songs of experience’ which laments the loss of innocence in the face of corruption
London key quotes
- ‘I wander thro’ each charter’d street, Near where the charter’d Thames does flow’
- ‘mind-forged manacles’
- ‘black’ning church appalls
London “I wander thro’ each charter’d street, near where the charter’d thames does flow”
analysis
- Blake juxtaposes ideas of natural freedom (Thames) with rigid control (charter’d), symbolising the loss of individual liberty under political and economic oppression. This analysis will explore the linguistic, thematic, and historical significance of these lines.
- “I wander” – The verb wander suggests aimlessness, perhaps even helplessness. It contrasts with the idea of controlled, structured streets, reinforcing a sense of powerlessness. The speaker is not in command of his movements; he simply drifts through an environment that is already mapped, controlled, and dictated by external forces.
- The repetition of charter’d conveys the idea that every street in London has been subjected to legal and economic ownership. The word charter’d suggests that public spaces have been licensed, mapped, and controlled for profit, leaving ordinary people restricted and trapped within a system that benefits the wealthy.
- Blake’s use of juxtaposition is key to understanding the poem’s message. He deliberately contrasts:
- The free-flowing Thames vs. Legal control – The river, a force of nature and movement, is placed in opposition to the bureaucratic and economic constraints of London.
- Personal freedom vs. Institutional oppression – The speaker wanders but does so through a landscape that is entirely charter’d, implying that even movement in London is dictated by external forces.
- Public vs. Private ownership – Streets and rivers are traditionally communal spaces, but the word “charter’d” implies they have been placed under legal and financial control, highlighting the rise of private ownership and economic inequality.
- This clash between natural freedom and human-imposed restriction is central to Blake’s critique of 18th-century capitalism and monarchy, where even spaces that should be for the public good (streets, rivers) are instead monetised and controlled by the powerful.
- The most significant word in these lines is “charter’d”, which appears twice. It carries powerful political and economic connotations:
- A charter was a legal document issued by a monarch or government, often granting exclusive rights to a particular group, such as merchants or landlords.
- In Blake’s time, many public resources were being privatised, including land, trade routes, and even aspects of the River Thames. The City of London Corporation controlled access to the Thames, and tolls were imposed on its use, meaning even natural resources were becoming financial assets.
- Charter’d suggests that everything in London has been mapped, regulated, and restricted for profit, leaving no space for true freedom.
By repeating charter’d, Blake emphasises the pervasiveness of economic and legal constraints in London, reinforcing a sense of suffocation and lack of autonomy.
“Thames” – A Symbol of Natural Freedom (Now Lost)
The River Thames is traditionally a symbol of movement, natural energy, and freedom. By calling it charter’d, Blake implies that even nature has been put under bureaucratic control, reinforcing the theme of unnatural restriction. This creates a stifling, claustrophobic tone, making London feel like a prison where even the river cannot flow freely.
- Alliteration and Phonetic Effects
Blake’s use of alliteration and sound devices enhances the oppressive tone of the poem:- “Charter’d” / “Charter’d” – The hard ‘ch’ sound is repeated, creating a harsh, grating effect that mirrors the rigid control he describes. This sound almost forces the reader to stumble and pause, mimicking the lack of freedom in Blake’s London.
- “Thro’” and “flow” – The soft, elongated vowels in “flow” contrast with the clipped sounds of “charter’d”. This contrast further highlights the struggle between restriction and natural movement. The Thames should flow, but Blake’s language makes it clear that this freedom is an illusion.
- “I wander” – The long, open vowel sounds in wander give the line a melancholy, weary tone, reinforcing the speaker’s powerlessness and despair.
The phonetics of these lines enhance the tension between movement and restriction, making the reader feel the suffocating nature of Blake’s London.
london ‘mind-forged manacles’ analysis
- The phrase “mind-forged manacles” is a metaphor representing psychological oppression. While “manacles” (chains or shackles) are typically physical restraints, Blake suggests that the most powerful form of imprisonment is mental rather than physical. This reflects the idea that people in London are not only suffering from external oppression (poverty, government control, industrialisation) but also from internalised beliefs that prevent them from seeking freedom or change.
- “Mind-forged” implies that these restraints are not imposed solely by external forces but are created and reinforced by individuals themselves through societal conditioning.
- This links to Blake’s broader themes of institutional control, social conformity, and self-imposed limitations.
- Blake employs alliteration in the repeated ‘m’ sound (“mind-forged manacles”), which creates a heavy, rhythmic effect. This has several impacts:
- The harsh, mechanical sound mimics the clanking of real manacles, reinforcing the theme of entrapment.
- The repetition slows the reader down, making the phrase more impactful.
- The hard ‘m’ and ‘d’ sounds contribute to the metallic and oppressive tone, making the phrase feel restrictive and weighty.
- The phrase is short yet highly impactful, packed with meaning in just three words. Blake’s choice to omit a verb makes it more declarative and absolute, as if stating an undeniable truth. The hyphenation of “mind-forged” links the words closely, reinforcing the idea that mental conditioning is an active, almost industrial process
london ‘black’ning church appalls’ analysis
- This phrase ties into Blake’s broader critique of institutions, showing how the Church, which should provide refuge and morality, instead contributes to society’s oppression by remaining passive in the face of suffering.
- Blake’s phrase “black’ning church appalls” is deeply symbolic, carrying multiple layers of meaning:
- Religious Hypocrisy – The “Church” is typically associated with purity, morality, and guidance. However, the “black’ning” suggests corruption, moral decay, or guilt, implying that instead of offering hope and salvation, the Church is complicit in the suffering of London’s poor.
- Industrial Pollution – The literal interpretation of “black’ning” could refer to the soot and smoke from the Industrial Revolution, which physically darkened the buildings of London, including its churches. This reflects how industrialisation taints not just the city but also its moral institutions.
- Sin and Evil – The colour black often symbolises sin, evil, or oppression in literature. The black’ning of the Church suggests it is not only physically darkened but also spiritually tainted by its inaction.
This phrase ties into Blake’s broader critique of institutions, showing how the Church, which should provide refuge and morality, instead contributes to society’s oppression by remaining passive in the face of suffering.
- Blake’s use of alliteration in “black’ning” and “Church” creates a striking auditory effect:
- The harsh ‘k’ sound in “black’ning” and “Church” mirrors the abrasive, polluted atmosphere of London, reinforcing the imagery of decay.
- The elongated vowel sounds in “appalls” create a sombre, drawn-out effect, as if the Church’s horror is stretching over time but without action.
The phonetics contribute to the phrase’s ominous tone, making it feel heavy and accusatory.
- “Appalls” – A complex word choice with dual meanings:
- It can mean to horrify or disgust, suggesting that the Church is disturbed by the suffering of London.
- However, it also derives from the Latin pallere (to grow pale), which could imply weakness or a failure to act.
London key forms
- quatrains and ABAB rhyme
- Iambic tetrameter
London quatrains and ABAB rhyme analysis
- to emulate the mass oppression and restriction that the lower classes were subject to - they were oppressed by establishments chaining them to ‘mind-forged manacles’
- as the stanza length and rhyme is not broken, blake uses this to mimic how this control seems unbreakable and sempiternal.
London iambic tetrameter analysis
- the consistent iambic tetrameter heightens the motif of oppression that permeates the poem; there is no freedom to escape this control.
- blake provides a glimmer of hope when he breaks the iambic tetrameter on ‘marks of weakness, marks of woe’. he could be implying that there is hope to break free from this oppression if london was to be united against the establishments that controlled them.
London comparisons
- Ozymandias
- My last Duchess
- the prelude
London / ozymandias comparison
Comparison themes: Power, human suffering, control, decay of power
* Both explore how human power is ultimately temporary.
* London shows ongoing suffering caused by corrupt power, while Ozymandias shows how once-great rulers are forgotten and powerless in the face of time.
* Both critique authority: Blake criticises institutions (church, monarchy), Shelley mocks the arrogance of rulers.
london / my last duchess comparison
Comparison themes: Control, abuse of power, oppression
* Both feature figures with too much power: the Duke in My Last Duchess, and the institutions in London.
* Both poems explore how people are silenced—Blake shows the poor and vulnerable suffering, and Browning presents a woman who is controlled and destroyed for being too independent.
london / the prelude comparison
Comparison themes: Power of nature vs. power of man, internal conflict
* London focuses on man-made suffering in a corrupted city, while The Prelude contrasts this by showing nature’s power to inspire fear and respect.
* Both poems include a shift from confidence to fear, especially linked to forces beyond the speaker’s control.
ozymandias summary
ozymandias tells the tale of a statue in the desert that is now decrepit and dilapidated but once was a statue of the great ‘ozymandias’. the statue is in the middle of the barren desert, with nothing around it for miles but boasts of it’s great empire, might and power. ozymandias’ statue serves as a stark reminder to all that power is ephemeral and that all empires must fall. it criticises those who lust for power by portraying the memory of a once mighty king as no encapsulated by a broken monument.
Ozymandias context
- shelley was a romantic poet - believed in power of nature and the spiritual connection to it (known as the sublime)
- shelley was also anti-monarchy and a pacifist
Ozymandias key quotes
- “ My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: / Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
- “Nothing beside remains. Round the decay / Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare”
- “The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
Ozymandias “ My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: / Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!” analysis
- The inscription on the pedestal of Ozymandias’ ruined statue, “My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: / Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”, serves as a powerful example of dramatic irony, arrogance, and the inevitable decline of human achievements. This analysis explores the linguistic, structural, and thematic significance of these lines.
- This quote represents Ozymandias’ belief in his own greatness, but the reality of the poem contradicts his expectations.
- “My name is Ozymandias” – By stating his name first, the ruler emphasizes his identity and status. He sees himself as legendary and worthy of eternal remembrance. However, the irony is that his name has been preserved, but his power has vanished.
- “King of Kings” – This biblical allusion elevates Ozymandias above all other rulers, as if he considers himself a supreme monarch, second only to God. The phrase is also found in Christian scripture (used for Jesus Christ), making Ozymandias’ arrogance even more striking. His god-like self-image contrasts with the reality of his forgotten empire.
- “Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!” – This is an imperative command, directed at future rulers. Ozymandias believes his achievements are so great that even the most powerful rulers should feel hopeless in comparison.
- Dramatic Irony – The irony is that his “Works” no longer exist. The statue is ruined, his empire has crumbled, and nature has reclaimed the land. Instead of inspiring fear, his words now serve as a warning about the fleeting nature of power.
Blake uses juxtaposition to emphasize the irony in Ozymandias’ declaration: - “King of Kings” vs. the broken statue – Ozymandias boasts ultimate power, yet he is now nothing but a shattered relic.
- “Look on my Works” vs. The surrounding wasteland – His “Works” have disappeared, replaced by boundless and bare sands. This contrast reinforces the futility of human pride.
- The voice of Ozymandias vs. The voice of the speaker – The inscription presents Ozymandias as a powerful ruler, but the poet’s voice reveals his insignificance.
This clash between expectation and reality highlights the fragility of human power.
King of Kings” – The repetition of the ‘K’ sound makes the phrase sound strong and authoritative, reinforcing his perceived power. - “My Works” – The ‘W’ sound slows the line, giving a boastful and self-important tone.
- Punctuation & Caesura:
- The colon after “King of Kings” forces a pause, as if Ozymandias expects admiration.
- The comma in “Look on my Works, ye Mighty” mimics a commanding tone.
- Iambic Pentameter:
- The rhythm of this line echoes formal speech, making it sound like a proclamation or decree.
Ozymandias
“Nothing beside remains. Round the decay / Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare” analysis
- These lines come towards the end of the poem and serve as a crucial turning point, where the reader fully realises the dramatic irony of Ozymandias’ once-great empire now reduced to ruins. Shelley contrasts the boastful inscription on the statue with the reality of its decay and insignificance, reinforcing the poem’s themes of transience, the power of nature, and the futility of human pride.
- The stark simplicity of these lines emphasises the complete downfall of Ozymandias’ empire:
- “Nothing beside remains.” – This short, blunt sentence shatters the illusion of power built up in Ozymandias’ words.
- “Nothing” is a powerful absolute – it completely erases Ozymandias’ achievements.
- The short, final-sounding sentence mimics the emptiness of the scene, reinforcing the idea that power is temporary.
- “Round the decay / Of that colossal Wreck” – This phrase emphasises the destruction of what was once great.
- “Decay” suggests slow, inevitable ruin, symbolising how time gradually erases all human achievements.
- “Colossal” implies that the statue was once enormous and impressive, making its current wrecked state even more ironic.
- “Wreck” suggests complete destruction, reinforcing the idea that powerful rulers cannot escape the forces of time and nature.
- “Boundless and bare” – This phrase creates an image of vast emptiness, highlighting the contrast between Ozymandias’ arrogance and the reality of his forgotten empire.
- “Boundless” suggests endless space, emphasising how insignificant the ruins are compared to the vast desert.
- “Bare” reinforces the isolation of the scene, stripping away all traces of human civilisation.
Shelley juxtaposes two opposing ideas to enhance the poem’s irony: - “Nothing” vs. “Colossal” – This sharp contrast highlights the scale of loss. Ozymandias once ruled a powerful empire, yet now nothing remains of his greatness.
- “Decay” vs. “Boundless” – The word “decay” implies gradual disintegration, while “boundless” suggests limitlessness. This contrast reflects how time erodes human achievements, leaving only nature behind.
- The human vs. the eternal – Ozymandias represents the temporary nature of human power, while the desert represents the eternal. Shelley’s imagery suggests that civilisations rise and fall, but nature remains unchanged.
Alliteration: - “Boundless and bare” – The repeated ‘b’ sound creates a soft, echoing effect, reinforcing the vast emptiness of the desert.
- Caesura:
- “Nothing beside remains.” – The full stop in the middle of the line forces the reader to pause, emphasising finality and loss.
- Iambic Pentameter:
- The steady rhythm mimics the slow, inevitable passing of time, reinforcing the idea that everything fades away eventually.
Ozymandias “The lone and level sands stretch far away.” analysis
- The final line, “The lone and level sands stretch far away,” serves as a haunting conclusion to the poem, reinforcing the themes of transience, isolation, and nature’s dominance over human ambition.
- This line paints a vivid image of emptiness and reinforces the poem’s central message:
- “The lone and level sands” – This phrase symbolises both physical emptiness and the erasure of Ozymandias’ legacy.
- “Lone” – Suggests isolation and abandonment, reinforcing the idea that Ozymandias and his empire have been forgotten.
- “Level” – Suggests uniformity and sameness, contrasting with Ozymandias’ desire to be unique and remembered. It also implies that nature has “levelled” his achievements, erasing any sign of his greatness.
- “Sands” – A symbol of time, as in the sands of an hourglass, representing the inevitable passing of all human achievements.
- “Stretch far away” – This phrase extends the image of emptiness and endlessness, reinforcing the vast insignificance of Ozymandias’ remains.
- The verb “stretch” gives a sense of infinity, suggesting that time and nature will continue long after Ozymandias has been forgotten.
- The phrase evokes a desolate and unchanging landscape, where human ambition fades into nothingness.
Lone” – Suggests desolation and abandonment, reinforcing the isolation of Ozymandias’ forgotten legacy. - “Level” – Has a double meaning:
- Literally, it describes the flat, featureless desert.
- Metaphorically, it suggests that time has “levelled” all human accomplishments, erasing any distinction between the mighty and the weak.
- “Sands” – A classic symbol of time, often associated with hourglasses and the inevitable passing of all things.
- “Stretch far away” – Emphasises the vastness of the desert, creating a sense of infinity.
Shelley’s word choices create a bleak, haunting image, reinforcing the idea that nothing lasts forever.
Lone and level” – The repeated ‘L’ sound creates a smooth, flowing effect, mimicking the endless sands. - This gentle repetition contrasts with the harsh, broken imagery of Ozymandias’ ruined statue, reinforcing his insignificance.
- Sibilance:
- The repeated ‘S’ sounds in “sands stretch” create a soft, whispering effect, mirroring the silence and stillness of the desert.
- Meter & Pace:
- This line slows down the poem, mimicking the stillness of the landscape.
- It provides a sense of finality, as if the sands go on forever, just as time continues without Ozymandias.
Ozymandias key forms
- Mix of Petrachan and Shakespearean sonnet
- Iambic pentameter
Ozymandias - mix of Petrachan and Shakespearean sonnet analysis
- the poem is set as a sonnet, traditionally a way of writing love poems. therefore, by making the statue the focus of the poem, shelley could be making it an object of love and respect. this sentiment contrasts with the content of the poem, which in actuality ridicules the statue.
- the sonnet form allows shelley to simultaneously mock ozymandias’ lack of love and respect, but to ridicule his excessive hubris that resulted in this infatuation and love with barbaric power.
- the poem uses a blend of petrarchan and shakespearean sonnet, perhaps as a way of showing how even old ideas, such as everlasting power, can be changed and evolved.
Ozymandias - iambic pentameter analysis
- it is used as a motif of control. iambic pentameter is used throughout the poem in order to demonstrate the frightful regularity of the oppression by those in power on those they rule. its use so regularly may also suggest that there is no way to break free - they are constrained by the oppressive tyrant that rules them.
Ozymandias comparisons
- london
- My last duchess
- storm on the island