Poli 151 Final Flashcards
(140 cards)
Delegation
A conditional grant of authority by member states to an independent body
Why Delegate?
Overcome issue cycling, there is efficiency through specialization, sustain credible commitments, provide information that states might not otherwise share and, in general, reduce the transaction costs of decision making
What is the difference between standard international cooperation and delegation?
Delegation involves principles delegating power to Agents, SIC involves governments adjusting their policies themselves
What is pooling?
We define pooling as joint decision making among the principals themselves, like the EU with majority rule (though the EU is also somewhat independent)
Three Dimensions of Pooling
Formal power, decision making rules, and informal power.
Formal Power
Literal formal power in an IO (ie number of votes based on population or economic contribution, this is related to the voting structure)
Informal Power
The ability of a state to influence decision outcomes by means outside the formal rules: personal charisma, negotiation ability, trust & legitimacy, administrative competence, expert knowledge, outside opinions, structural power (ex: the post WW2 IO’s set up to benefit the US)
What are variations in pooling?
Voting and decision making rules, like majority rule vs unanimity
What are the costs of delegation?
Delegation can leave issues up to specific agents that have their own interests, and states will use IGOs to their own interests, also there is a tradeoff here between state autonomy and delegation
What is the tradeoff of delegation?
With more delegation comes more efficiency and less autonomy for each state
What is the tradeoff with decision making rules?
We see different structures have different advantages (think the House vs the Senate but for IO voting) where some IGOs would benefit from having votes given based on population, while others benefit from having vote individual (like with the UN compared to say an ‘ideal’ proportional democracy).
Agent
People who do not work on behalf of their own country, they fulfill some goal of that IGO
Their job is to work in administrative, information gathering, coordination, agenda setting, arbitration, enforcement, rule making sectors
What is the tradeoff of delegating to an IO Agent?
Agents are rational self interested actors whose opinion can vary from that of states. They can pursue their own goals, withhold information, conceal their actions, or use their independence against the principle. As we delegate more to an agent, we get closer to agency slippage
How can states control agents?
We have Ex ante (before) control: threats, agent screening, institutionalized checks and balances, monitoring
And Ex post (after) control: sanctions, renegotiation of the contract
How is controlling agents costly?
Limiting independence decreases efficiency (think the general tradeoff between efficiency and autonomy)
The ability to control and sanction is reliant on a number of factors (IGO size, voting structure, regional vs universal, economic structure, purpose)
There is a tradeoff here between oversight costs and efficiency losses
Effectiveness
We can define this in a number of ways depending on perspective: is it the ability to achieve country goals, at in emergencies, achieve IGO goals, enforce decisions, delegate sovereignty (trust in an IGO?), ability to change a states domestic policies
And then there’s the benchmark: do we use the status quo? Or the IO preference?
And if member states are heterogenous whose perspectives/goals are we aiming to realize?
How do we assess effectiveness?
We can look to a number of factors here like an IGOs power and the compliance of its members, but have to take into account structural limitations (homogeny, cooperation costs, power)
What are three strategies democratizing IGOs can utilize? Upsides and downsides?
IGOs can foster democracy through control incentives and conditionality
Control
Control can be through sanction or forced military occupation following an invasion, but is costly militaristically, isn’t always effective, and isn’t always seen as legitimate
Incentives
Incentives can come as economic aid, counseling, guarantees to key groups, credibility, but there are incentives to defect, there are coordination problems, and strategic interests of powerful states will always be at play.
Conditionality
IGO requires from a sovereign state to install or consolidate democracy before receiving the promised benefits, but the credibility of sanctions can vary
Principle Agent Theory / Problem
Because the agent is a rational actor, they might have different preferences, and can take actions to pursue their own goals. There is a payoff here between increased control and efficiency, as ex ante and ex post control can both be utilized by the principle to ensure control over the agent.
Agency Slippage
Occurs when agents overuse power and policy autonomy begins to slip away; an agency’s influence increases with independence and its information advantage
IGOs (and a way they vary)
Formal entities built upon treaties, constitutions, or emanations (formed from other IGOs) that have a permanent secretariat, acting office, HQ, or other permanent structure, and they are comprised of a number of players: IO bureaucrats, member states (at least 3).
One dimension they can vary within is their geographic requirements! We have universal IOs, regional IOs and cross regional IOs