POLI 442 Midterm Flashcards
(54 cards)
consumption indifference curve
a graphical representation showing the combinations of two goods where a consumer experiences the same level of satisfaction
slope of indifference curve
tells us the marginal rate of substitution
marginal rate of substitution
the rate where a consumer can give up some amount of one good in exchange for another good while maintaining the same level of utility
production possibility frontier
a graphical representation that shows the maximum combinations of two goods that can be produced using available resources
marginal rate of transformation
the rate at which one good must be sacrificed to produce an additional unit of another good
slope of PPF
equal to the marginal rate of transformation
comparative advantage
whatever product someone produces most efficiently compared to other products they can produce, what you can produce for a lower opportunity cost
absolute advantage
the ability to produce more of a given product than the other country for the same input of resources
opportunity cost
the potential forgone profit from a missed opportunity, the result of choosing to produce one product over another
utility
the amount of user satisfaction you get out of something, how happy you are
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
- intersectional factor mobility: high
- countries vary by: (relative) factor endowments
- with trade: countries export good that intensively use the well endowed factor
- winner: owner of abundant factor
- loser: owner of scarce factor
factor of production
resources to produce goods
sector of production
production of different types of goods
capital factor of production
high skill labor
labor factor of production
low skill labor
Stolper-Samuelson Theorem
goes along with Heckscher-Ohlin, when all factors are mobile across sectors, an increase in the price of a good will increase the real earnings of the factor used intensively in the production of the good, and decrease the real earnings of the other factor
Ricardo-Viner Model
- intersectional factor mobility: low
- countries vary by: technologies of production
- with trade: countries export good in which it has comparative advantage
- winner: owner of factor specific to export industry
- loser: owner of factor specific to import-competing industry
median voter theorem
if members of a group have single peaked preferences, then the ideal point of median voter will be the winner
Walter’s compensation hypothesis
losers of globalization are more likely to express feelings of economic insecurity which leads them to demand for compensation and prefer left parties because of the social welfare programs that the left promotes
Colantone and Stanig: Threats to compensation
individuals in regions more exposed to Chinese import competition are more likely to vote for radical right parties because rising globalization being linked to support for left wing parties only works if the left can actually provide the welfare programs
globalization paradox
at the exact moment that more (low-skilled) workers would demand greater labor market protection from government, countries are increasingly unable to afford these forms of employment insurance
compensation hypothesis headline
they would rather vote for parties proposing limitations to free trade, even if bundled with a reduction of the welfare state
Colantone and Stanig: Brexit
similarly to studying the political scale, they found that regions of the UK who were more exposed to China stock were more likely to vote for Brexit
unidimensional views on globalization
IPE researchers have found that arguments on globalization correlate to other single policy areas. For example, if you dislike more trade, you also dislike more immigration and investment and so on.