Political Questions Flashcards
(33 cards)
Are political question holdings really just ___
merits holdings in disguise
The fact that a case is politically important__
does not make it a political question.
Hamburger: Political question doctrine has been __ leading credence to suggestions of some justices that they are open to reinterpreting
misused
Hamburger thinks it was ____ to use political questions doctrine in Nixon or Luther
not appropriate (not applicable or necessary)
“the political question doctrine is “essentially a function of the ___,” Baker (quoted in Nixon, __
SoP, Souter dissenting
Political questions are those that ___
belong to a political branch
Key question of political Q - Is the legal issue presented ___ or is it instead a matter ___
appropriate for judicial resolution, left to the resolution of the political branches of government?
What belongs to the political branches is ___
not clearN
Narrow version of what belongs to the political branches
what Const gives to President and Congress
Broad version of what belongs to the political branches
that which judiciary in its prudence decides it shouldn’t decide [room for abuse?]
Generally, courts are reluctant to get involved in political questions because they are fearful of ____, which it depends on because unlike other branches it ____
jeopardizing judiciary’s legitimacy, doesn’t have enforcement powers
One reason courts will consider something a political question is if t___ (e.g., impeachment as in Nixon
they fear a ruling on the matter might not be listened to
“A controversy is nonjusticiable—i.e., involves a political question—where there is “___; OR a lack of ___….” Baker v. Carr (quoted in Walter Nixon)
a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department OR judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it
Other Baker factors
impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion; or the impossibility of a court’s without expressing lack of the respect due coordinate branches of government; or an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made; or the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question
Luther facts
Dispute/rebellion in Rhode Island between “charter government” (with restricted franchise) and self-proclaimed gvt. based off new const.. President endorses charter gvt. and rebellion dies down
Luther holding
Whether a state government is legitimate is not a judicial subject but a political one, and is the determination of Congress and the President, not the courts
Luther takeaway
some types of legal disputes which the Constitution allocates to legislature/executive
What is Republican form of governance clause
presupposes that Congress and/or the President will determine if a state has a republican form of government or is subject to domestic violence
Luther reasoning 1
Republican form of governance clause so not judicial Q
Luther reasoning 2
Both old and new governments constitutions meet the “republican form of government” Constitutional requirement. So perhaps neither is objectively legally “correct” in the eyes of the Court
Nixon Facts
Nixon was a federal judge who was convicted of accepting a bribe in order to ask a local district attorney to drop a case. He did not resign, so he continued getting salary in prison. The House impeached him. The Senate convicted him for perjury etc., after having first had a select committee take evidence (so trial isn’t before entire Senate).
Nixon holding
claim not justiciable because of textual commitment and lack of finality, it’s up to the Senate to determine how it wants to interpret its impeachment proceedings
Textual commitment in Nixon __
Constitution’s use of the words “try” and “sole” imply the Senate has broad discretion in its impeachment proceedings
Lack of finality argument in Nixon _
judicial review of Senate impeachment procedures would lead to chaos