politics of planned development Flashcards
(30 cards)
How should decisions of development be taken?
- Not a single person but rather a group of experts
- Include environmentalists
- People with different view
- In the end its a political decision to be made by the representatives who should take the people’s opinions and aspirations into account
- By following the priorities of development
What is left and right wing politics
LEFT
- rights
- progress
- reforms
- internationalism
- liberty
- equality
- fraternity
RIGHT
- authority
- hierarchy
- duty
- order
- nationalism
- tradition
What were the ideas of development at the time of independence?
- Modern
- West
- Industrialized
- Liberalism
- Free Market
- Growth
- Material progress
- Development of science
What was there consensus on for development in the 1950s-60s? Why?
The economy cannot be left to the private sector and there was need for government planning to rebuild the economy because of the following reasons:
- Inter-war Reconstruction of Japan and Germany
- Economic Growth of Soviet Union that followed the central planning system
- The Great Depression
What is the Bombay Plan?
1944
Joint proposal - Big team of industrialists - planned economy - government initiatives for industrial and other economic investments
aim - double the then current agricultural output
five-fold growth in industry (both within the
framework of 100 Billion Rupees)
protection for domestic industries from foreign
competition
criticism - both from left and right
- from economists as it did not account for the
inflationary effect of creating capital -
overestimating
When was the Planning Commission created?
March 1950
Who was the head of the Planning Commission?
Ex-officio chairman - Prime Minister
What was the aim of the Planning Commission?
- Ensure adequate means of livelihood for all individuals
- Ensure that the ownership and control of material resources are distributed to subserve the common benefit
- Ensure the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production is not for the common detriment
What kind of role did the Planning Commission have?
Advisory Role. For its recommendations to be effective the Union Government had to approve of it.
Why was the Planning Commission abolished?
It was ineffective and irrelevant considering the increasing globalisation especially in the 21st century and the new challenges it posed. Thus, on Independence day , 2014, Narendra Modi spoke about the abolition of the Planning Commission.
When was the NITI Aayog constituted?
January 1, 2015
What is the aim of the NITI Aayog?
- Provide the necessary technical assistance to the Union Government regarding Centre and State policy-making
- Cooperative Federalism - Increased participation of states
- Bottom - up approach
- Harmonize interests of national interests and economic policy
- Strategic and long-term framework of policy and programmes
Who is the chairperson of the NITI Aayog?
Prime Minister
How is the Vice Chairperson of the NITI Aayog appointed?
Appointed by PM
Who was the first Vice -Chairperson of the NITI Aayog?
Arvind Panagariya
Who is the current Vice-Chairperson of the NITI Aayog?
Dr. Rajiv Kumar
When was the first five year plan released?
December 1951
When were the Plan Holidays?
1966-69
Why were there Plan holidays?
- Novelty of Planning had decreased
- Failure of third Five Year Plan
- Economic Crisis - low agricultural, failed monsoons, rising unemployment, food scarcity, increase in military expenditure, diversion of resources from economic and social planning, rising prices especially of essential commodities
Describe the objectives of the first five year plan?
- K.N Raj - one of the major drafters of the first five year plan - hasten slowly because a fast rate of development would threaten democracy
- agriculture sector - focus as it was hit hardest by partition - investment in dams - large scale projects - bhakra nangal dam, hirakud dam, damodar valley dam - investment in irrigation
- rehabilitation of refugees
- food self-sufficiency
- price stability
- pattern of land distribution - major obstacle - agriculture - land reforms
- increase national income - increase savings - reduce spending - spending was very low not possible - increase savings - difficult - total capital stock low compared to number of employable people - savings did rise but not as remarkable as expected then decreases in third five year plan
Describe the second five-year plan
- Rapid Structural Transformation
- Making changes simultaneously in many areas
- Based on Mahalanobis Plan
- Congress annual session - avadi near Chennai - declared socialist pattern of development
- reflected in plan
- Protection of industries from foreign consumption -establishment of many public and private industries
- increase in savings and investment -
- steel , electricity , railways
- shift from investment in domestic goods industries to investment in capital goods industries
- technologically backwards - had to spend precious foreign reserves on technology for industries
- increased allocation of resources for industry rather than agriculture - possibility of food shortage
- balancing industry and agriculture HARD
Describe the third year plan
- Similar to 2nd five year plan
- savings decreased
- urban bias
- industry wrongly given bias than agriculture
wanted more focus on agricultural industries than heavy ones
What is the Kerala Model of Planning?
- Type of planning and development in Kerala
- Focus on health, education, land reforms, effective food distribution , poverty alleviation
- low infant and female mortality rates, high access to medical care, low birth rates, high life expectancy and nearly full literacy rates despite low income per capita and a weak industrial base
- New Democratic Initiative - 1987-1991 - campaigns for development designed for involvement of people in development activities through voluntary citizen’s organisations
- initiatives have also been taken by the state government to increase participation from individuals at panchayat, block and district levels
What are the key controversies of planning?
AGRICULTURE V.S INDUSTRY
- Gandhian Economists - J.C Kumarappa - building agricultural industries
- Chaudhary Charan Singh - Congress leader that broke away to form Bharatiya Lok Dal and later PM - agriculture - centre of planning - planning - prosperity of urban and industrial section at the cost of the rural population
- Some say that only industrialization can help people people escape the vicious cycle of poverty
- already attention given to agriculture - land reform laws, distribution of resources, community development programmes, large sums of irrigation, land distribution - failure not of policy but poor implementation because landowning classes had lot of economic and social power - besides poverty would not drastically decline if a large sum of money was spent on agriculture
PUBLIC Vs. PRIVATE SECTOR
- mixed
- lots of agriculture, trade and industry in the hands of private sector
- key heavy industries, industrial infrastructure, regulation of trade, necessary interventions in agriculture
- criticisms that the public sector was TOO INVOLVED - not enough space or stimulus for private sector to grow - lots of decisions - barriers - license and permit system -protection from foreign competition by tariffs on imports - not enough incentives for domestic industries - high corruption low efficiency
- criticisms that the public sector was NOT INVOLVED ENOUGH - no major investments in health or education - intervened only in places where private sector was not willing to go hence helping private sector make profits
- did not help poor - creation of middle class - higher salary less accountability
- proportion of poor reduced but not absolute number of poor