Possibilities during interpretation Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q
  1. What is meant by “no problems with correlation”?
A

Applying legal provisions to the facts is straightforward and aligns with its intended purpose and constitutional guidelines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What impression does this smooth application make?

A

It creates the false impression that interpretation is only needed when the text’s meaning is unclear or ambiguous, even though interpretation happens automatically in most cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. What is meant by modificative interpretation?
A

when the meaning of a legal text is adjusted because its original wording doesn’t fully match the law’s intended purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is modificative interpretation made?

A

when the text provides either more or less than its purpose or goes against the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can the purpose be modified just nje?

A

t’s purpose say that modification is necessary and possible?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which ways can be used to change the meaning of the text if it’s purpose say that modification is necessary and possible?

A

Restrictive interpretation or extensive interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by restrictive interpretation?

A

the initial meaning of the text is reduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by extensive interpretation?

A

the initial meaning of the text is extended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

On what grounds may the courts modify the initial meaning of the text?

A

if it appears that the initial meaning of the text will not give effect to the aim and purpose of the legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the indicators that the initial textual law should probably be modified?

A

Ambiguity, vagueness and absurdity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When should the initial meaning of the text be matched with it’s purpose?

A

The initial textual meaning must always be
compared with the purpose of the legislation to ensure that effect will be given to the aim of the legislation concerned, even if the initial meaning of the text seems to be clear at first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. What are the two specific form of restrictive interpretation?
A
  1. Cessante ratione legis, cessat et ipsa lex
  2. Eiusdem generis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(a)What is meant by cesante ratione legis cessat et ipsa lex?

A

When the reason for the law ends, the law itself ends.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is meant by eiusdem generis?

A

Of the same kind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is the restrictive interpretation limited to the 2 specific form?

A

No. Any interpretation that reduces the scope of a law to fit its purpose is a form of restrictive interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened in the case of Skinner v Palmer? (as a reference for restrictive interpretation)

A

The court changed the number ‘fifty-nine’ to ‘fifty-eight’, limiting the scope of the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why is the cessante ratione rule not applied in SA law in it’s original form?

A

Legislation remains in force until repealed
by the legislature concerned. (R v Detody)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was confirmed in the case R v Detody?

A

the court said laws can’t be killed just because times have changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

In which law can this rule apply and why?

A

The common law because if the law is not used or justified, it can fall away naturally

20
Q

How have South African courts applied the cessante ratione legis rule in an adapted way?

A

Courts sometimes suspend applying a law if its purpose has already been fulfilled,

Because enforcing it would be pointless or unfair.

21
Q

Which case can be used as reference for the cesante rule?

A

R v Maleka. In which the courts said a compensatory fine under the Stock Theft Act wasn’t needed when the victim had already been compensated.

22
Q

Can the cesante rule be applied in court orders? give reference to case law

A

Yes. S v Mujee, the father stopped paying maintenance because the child was no longer staying at the institution

23
Q

(b). The eiusdem generis rule is based on which principle?

A

The principle of noscitur a sociis which means “Birds of a feather flock together.”

24
Q

What does the noscitur principle

A

the meaning of general words is determined when they are used together with specific words

25
What is a key prerequisite for applying the eiusdem generis rule?
can only be applied if the specific words refer to a definite genus or category.
26
How does the eiudem rule apply?
Limits the meaning of general words by making them fit into the same category or genus as the specific words that come before them.
27
What was definite genus referred as to in the case of Colonial treasurer v Rand water board.
Common quality or common denominator
28
Which can be used as reference for when the eiudem generis rules was rejected?
Skotnes v South African Library
29
In which instances can the extensive interpretation be used?
When the initial meaning of the text is narrow than it's purpose/ the purpose is broader than the initial textual meaning of the legislation
30
What are the two main categories of extensive interpretation?
1. Interpretation by implication 2. Interpretation by analogy
31
What does interpretation by implication means?
involves extending the textual meaning on the ground of a reasonable and essential implication which is evident from the legislation. Express provisions are therefore extended by implied provisions. What the law doesn't say but may be implied to meet the purpose of the law
32
Which provisions can be used an example of extending expressive provision to implied provisions?
1. Ex contrariis (From opposites) 2. Ex consequentibus (From consequences) 3. Ex accessorio eius de quo verba loquuntur 4. Anatura ipsius rei: (From the nature of the thing itself) 5. Ex correlativis
33
What is it meant by Ex contrariis?
If the law says something applies in one situation, we may infer the opposite applies in the opposite situation — unless the purpose of the law suggests otherwise.
34
What is meant by ex consequentibus?
If legislation demands or allows a certain result or consequence, everything which is reasonably necessary to bring about that result or consequence may be implied. (Bloemfontein council v Richter)
35
What is meant by Ex accessorio eius de quo verba loquuntur?
If a principal thing is forbidden or permitted, the accessory thing is also forbidden or permitted.
36
What is meant by Anatura ipsius rei?
This refers to implied inherent relationships—for example, the power to issue a regulation implies the power to withdraw it
37
What is meant by Ex correlativis?
This arises from mutual or reciprocal relationships (eg prohibiting the purchase of certain things includes the prohibition of the sale of such goods).
38
What is meant by interpretation by analogy?
if legislation applies to certain mentioned instances and its purpose can apply equally to other unspecified instances, the legislation may be extended to such other instances on the basis of sameness of reason.
39
Why is interpretation by analogy seldom to applied by courts and mostly academic?
They avoid “creating new law” under the guise of interpretation. (Joint Liquidators of Glen Anil v Hill Samuel)
40
What was confirmed in the case of Joint Liquidators of Glen Anil v Hill Samuel ?
the court confirmed that an omission may not be supplied through interpretation by analogy
41
3) What does "No modification of the meaning is possible" mean in statutory interpretation?
It means the court must apply the law exactly as written if the purpose is unclear or doesn’t support a broader interpretation. Even if the result is imperfect
42
When is the court not allowed to adapt or change the meaning of the law?
When the purpose of the legislation is not clear or does not support modifying the text.
43
Who must correct errors or fill in gaps in legislation when courts can't interpret the text further?
The legislature (Parliament) — not the courts.
44
What can courts do instead in cases like these?
courts may fall back on common law to complete the application of the law.
45
Why is the court not allowed to make such modifications when stated that it's not allowed?
Courts are bound by the frame of reference of the law’s purpose — they can’t go beyond it to create new rules.