POST-MIDTERM Flashcards
(229 cards)
Give an example of field research. Depict the genral assumption, the methods, the findings, the general interpretation. What will follow this ? What is notable? What did the researcher note ?
Social organization in a public housing project
- General assumption: public housing projects are often associated with high levels of crime and low levels of social control.-The researcher chose a British community with i) a high level of crime and ii) containing a significant number of public housing projects.
- She spent 18 months “getting involved in as many aspects of life there as possible from attending tenant meetings, the mothers and toddlers group, and activities for young people, to socializing with some of the residents in the local pub“.*Foster, “Informal social control …“, British Journal of Criminology(1995)3
Conducted “extended interviews” with 45 residents in the community, a few from a contiguous community, and 25 ‘officials‘ – e.g., police, housing officers.
- Found:
- Crime was not perceived as a major problem by the residents.Crime existed – but was tolerated by the residents.
- Housing problems were seen as a major problem.
- There were “hidden economy“ crimes – for example, hiding income from welfare inspectors.
- There was fairly effective social control – for example shaming practices that reduced or prevented crime.
- Note the absence of hypotheses – the work was organized around a general interest in the subject rather than specific hypotheses.
The larger interpretation: crime is less of a problem for people (in high crime areas) where i) there are support networks – people can watch out for each other - and ii) there was someone to whom people could turn when they had a problem.
- She might have gone on to test this through further research on support networks and the characteristics of the people to whom residents could turn for support.
- The researcher emphasized that, through her fieldwork, she became an insider and this allowed her to go beyond outsider perceptions of what a high crime community is like.
Depict web surveys.
Their use has increased considerably.
They can take one of two forms: i) a respondent is directed to a web site with a questionnaire; ii) the questionnaire is either embedded in, or attached to, an e-mail message.
Information on progress through the questionnaire can be provided (percent completed, a bar crossing a box).
They have a relatively bad reputation.
What is significant about participant recall ? What should be done ?
There is strong evidence (for example, from studies of crime victimization) that the accuracy of recalled information declines over time.
This does not mean that questions requiring recall should not be asked. It means that the questions should be formulated to aid recall
What is the guetemala experiment, what are its ethical issues ?
- This study was also funded by the U.S. Public Health Service.
- It was led by a researcher who went on to participate in the later stages of the Tuskegee experiments (which continued to the beginning of the 1970s) along with researchers from Johns Hopkins University and the Rockefeller Foundation.
- The study was conducted from 1946 to 1948, after the discovery of penicillin. Its purpose was to assess the effect of penicillin the prevention and treatment of venereal diseases.
- The research involved deliberately infecting prostitutes, prisoners, soldiers, and mental health patients with syphilis, gonorrhea, and chancroid.
- 1,308 people Guatemalans were exposed to one of these diseases; 678 received treatment. There was, then, an untreated control group.
- Guatemala was chosen for the study because such research could not be conducted in the US. Guatemalan government officials agreed to a study but the details of the research appear to have been withheld from them.
- While the process of infecting subjects stopped in 1948, patient follow-up and analysis of the data continued into the 1950s.
ethical issues
- The subjects appear to have not been informed of the nature of the study and most of them were not in a position to give consent. Informed consent, then, was absent.
- Subjects risked or experienced harms.
- The researchers were assessing the effectiveness of penicillin. Had it been ineffective the subjects would have been harmed.
- Even though penicillin proved effective it is likely those who received it would experience some physiological damage from the initial infection.
- The control group members were left untreated
What is informed consent ? what does it include (7)
- Participants in research must give informed consent (cf. the Tuskegee experiment). Informed consent statements usually include:
- a description of the purpose and procedures of the project, including expected duration;
- a discussion of any risks or discomfort that might be associated with the project;
- a guarantee of anonymity and confidentiality of records;
- the coordinates of the researcher, so that subjects can contact him or her with any questions;
- a statement that makes it clear that participation is voluntary and that the subject can withdraw at any time;
- a statement of alternative procedures that may be used (if applicable);
- a statement of benefits or compensation that might be provided to subjects;
- an offer to provide a summary of the finding
_____________ is the major problem with experimentation in the social science.
External validity
What should we use when dealing with randomization?
There WILL be sampling error associated with each groups so we want to use inferential statistics. Sampling errors requires proceeds that respond to them, which is inferential statistics.
What is an important ethical component of social research? why is it a problem ?
Some research is only possible on deception
Deception is a problem because subjects need to get inform consent. Which they cant give if there are being decepted
What are data collection methods in surveys ?
Self-administered questionnaires
Phone surveys
Web surveys
Face-to-face interviews
What are open-ended vs closed ended questions?
Open-ended: respondent is asked to provide his or her own answer to a question
Closed-ended: respondent is asked to select an answer from a list provided by the researche
What is sampling error?
The difference between a sample statistic used to estimate a population parameter and the actual (unknown) value of the parameter.
Depict focus groups. what can they be used for ? how many people in them ususally- how do you determine that ? who are they led by ? when would you use a smaller group? How do you compose your group? what is valuable to do during them ?
- Interviews using a small group rather than a single individual.
- Have the advantage that they yield information both on people’s views about an issue and on their interactions over the issue. Bear in mind that people’s opinions are usually developed through interaction with others.
- Those interactions yield information on negotiated agreements and disagreements and on shared meanings and understandings.
- Can be used to test questions to be added to surveys – the focus group discussions, for example, can be used to identify response options of closed-ended questions.
- They typically involve 6 to 10 people. This is because: i) as group size increases so do scheduling difficulties; ii) in larger groups some members are likely not to participate.
- Complicated or emotionally charged issues are thought to work better with smaller groups.
- It is usually better to group participants with similar characteristics or experiences – though this would not be the case if the researcher were interested in understandings negotiated across social categories – for example, between men and women
- Groups can be stratified according to age, gender, race, occupation, etc., in order to explore the extent to which responses vary across these categories.
- Groups are usually led by a trained moderator who facilitates and guides the discussion.
- How many groups? As in qualitative research more generally, stop running groups when response saturation occurs. This tends to happen at 10 to 15 groups.
-Taping discussions is valuable. The moderator needs to ensure that the taped voices can be matched to participant
What are pros of face to face interviews ?
Pros
–High response rate (around 80% to 85% for the best survey organizations, like Statistics Canada)
–Decreased number of “don’t knows” and “no answers”
–Questions can be clarified
–Probing for alternative answers
–Can reach a population that has no fixed residence
–Interviewer can observe respondents and the setting in which they are interviewed
What does present value mean ?
- Cost and benefits are spread over time.
- Assume: income earlier is better than income later.
- If I get income today I might choose to invest some of it and get extra income in the future.
- If I get income today, I may not have to borrow money and incur interest payments.
- There is a rate of interest, which is usually positive: it implies that to get money now I have to pay a larger sum (principal plus interest) spread over some period of time in the future. Evidently, this implies that money now is worth more than money in the futur
What are general problems of ethics during social research ? how can they be triggered ?
More general problem : psychological abuse, stress, loss of self esteem — falsely telling men that they have feminine personality, creating situation of high fear, gruesome photos, asking to harm others, falsely tell students they failed a test
What is the difference between secondary data analysis and use of existing statistics
Secondary data analysis
- Data collected by others
- Researcher’s own statistical analysis
- Often done in quantitative research
Use of existing statistics
- Data collected by others
- May be someone else’s statistical analysis – though descriptive statistics from a source can often be combined for statistical analysis.
- Used in both quantitative and qualitative research
Considers interval validity in the case of One-group pretest-posttest.
History – other events may occur between the two observations, especially as the time period between the observations lengthens.
Maturation – between the two observations the students may grow older, more fatigued, bored (each depending on the time lag between observation).
Testing – for educational tests, for example, the first experience with the test may improve students performance at the second test. Scores on IQ tests increase by 3 to5 points without any supplemental training
Instrumentation (‘instrument decay’) – there may be changes in the measuring instrument. Observers of classroom behaviour may get tired, or more skilled at observation, or more blasé.
Regression towards the mean – in remediation instruction where poor performers are selected because they did poorly, there are likely to have been random effects accounting for the initial poor performance that will not be present during O2.
Since there is only one group there are no issues of differential selectionor mortality.
What are the 2 examples of regression towards the mean ? What did we use in the second to counter act ?
Low end of the distribution example: those who did badly are given a coaching program, they are tested again, their scores go up, can we infer it is because of the program ? If you observe the scores of a test , two things influence : 1. Cognitive ability 2. Ability and Radom factors. So we looking at the bottom 20%, the random factors will most likely be negative. You cant infer causation here because the low scores of this selected group had an accumulation of negative factors and It is unlikely they will experience the same negative factors. For the lower ground, it is likely that their performance will improve regardless because they were subject to negative factors.
Higher end of distribution example: How do you chose an advisor ? Rating based on previous performance. But this not valid, because the random factors came into play- they will probably come back down again, they are likely to do worse because their first performance was based on luck. Those who did well tend to regress towards the mean. The high ranking are produced by 1. Ability knowledge 2. Luck. So mostly firms who did well will do worst later, those who did worst will do better later
So we use Index Funds: buy a distribution of share that represent the distribution of the market as a whole. (Instead of having someone picking shares for you) So your performance is based on the market not on individuals, plus saving the fees.
Depict unstructured interviews. What is it in practice ?
- ‘Unstructuredness’ is, in practice, a question of degree.
- The interviewer will have a list of topics. But the course of the interview and the topics may diverge considerably from the list.
- Thus, in research on ‘clubbers’ “interviews were very much ‘conversational’ in style, although all the interviews were taped. The first interview was designed …. To put the clubber at ease while also explaining fully and clearly in what ways I was hoping for help; to begin to sketch in details of the clubbers preferences, motivations and histories; and to decide how to approach the night(s) out that I would be spending with the clubber … The main content of the second [more relaxed] interview consisted of comments, discussion, and the question about the club visits … And the nature of the night out as an experience … [D]iscussion occasionally diversified …. To cover wider aspects of the clubbers’ lives.” (Malbon, Clubbing: Dancing, Ecstasy and Vitality, 1999].
- It should be clear, nonetheless, that there is more structure than in a casual conversation because the research will be motivated by some initial ideas about what to look for.
Depict strengths and weaknesses of qualitative interviewing/
Strengths:
Respondents play a larger role in determining the content of the interview. This means that their views are more likely to be faithfully represented.
There is the possibility of unexpected topics being raised. These unexpected topics may provide the basis for new theorizing.
Weaknesses
The very rich, descriptive, data yielded by the interviews is often hard to analyse. Software described by B&R considerably helps with this.
- Since each interview is a different conversation reliability is an issue. The ‘measurements’ (so to speak) of other researchers examining the same subject are unlikely to tap exactly the same thing. Nor, for that matter, need consecutive interviews by the same researcher.
- Qualitative interviewing necessarily involves small samples, so generalization is likely to be a problem
What are self-administered sruveys ? How do they work ? How are response rates? What can increase their responses, how (4)?
The most common form is the mail survey: a questionnaire, a set of instructions, and envelope for the respondent to send back the completed form.
For anonymity, include a postcard with the questionnaire – to be returned at the same time. This allows you to keep track of who has returned their questionnaire, without identifying which questionnaire belongs to which respondent.
Response rates vary. They are lower than telephone or face to face interview response rates.
Follow-up mailings increase the survey response and may be administered in various ways:
- Letters of encouragement to non-respondents;
- New copies of the questionnaire with a follow-up letter.
- A total of three mailings is usually about right.
- Two or three weeks between each mailing is reasonable.
How can social research create a possibility for legal harm ? what is also worth questioning ?
There is possibly for legal harm to subjects
For example : reporting people who violated law , leading to direct worsening situation by raising security and therefore uncover cases
Is not reporting observed behaviour also a Crime ?
Of challenges to external validity, two are not solved by any of the designs we’ve considered, which ones ?
the interaction between selection and the experimental effect, and the effect of experimental artificiality.
