Potential philo of religion essays

Question 1

“There is probably no God.” To what extent do you agree with this claim? (2019)

Answer 1

Intro
- improbability of God
- incoherence of the God of classical theism
-presumption of atheism
Conclusion

Question 2

To what extent does Aquinas offer the most convincing cosmological argument? (2019)

Answer 2

Intro
- aquinas’ causation, motion and contingency
- kalam cosmological argument
Conclusion

Question 3

To what extent is the God of classical theism incoherent? (2022)

Answer 3

Intro
- incoherence of God of classical theism

Conclusion

Question 4

To what extent is Paley’s argument from design successful? (2022)

Answer 4

Intro
- paley’s argument
- intelligent design arguments
- aquinas’ argument
Conclusion

Question 5

To what extent is Leibniz’s argument form principle of sufficient reason successful? (2022)

Answer 5

Intro
- leibniz’s psr
- kalam
- aquinas
Conclusion

Question 6

“Science can account for anything.” To what extent do you agree?(2023)

Answer 6

Intro
- incoherence
- improbability of God
conclusion

Question 7

p

“Gravity explains the planets in motion, but cannot explain who sets the planets in motion.” To what extent do you agree?(2023)

Answer 7

Intro
- aquinas’ argument
- paley
- intelligent desihn
Conclusion

Question 8

“The best one can say is that the universe is finite with respect to the past, not that it was an event with a beginning” (2023)

Answer 8

Intro
- aquinas’ argument
- leibniz’s PSR
- kalam
Conclusion

Question 9

“The kalam argument fails to prove that God exists.” To what extent do you agree? (2024)

Answer 9

Intro
-kalam
- aquinas
- leibniz’s PSR
Conclusion

Question 10

“Argument from intelligent design fails to prove that God exists.” How far do you agree with this statement? (2024)

Answer 10

Intro
- intelligent design
- paley’s argument
- Aquinas’ argument
Conclusion

Question 11

“Scientific responses to the cosmological argument show that it is unsuccessful.” How valid is this claim? (Spec)

Answer 11

Intro
- aquinas’
- kalam’s
- lebniz’s PSR
Conclusion

Question 12

“The teleological argument proves that the universe is designed.” How valid is this claim (spec)

Answer 12

intro
- aquinas’ design
- paley’s design
- intelligent design
conclusion

Question 13

“Given the improbability of God, atheism is the only acceptable response.” How valid is this claim (2021)

Answer 13

Intro
- improbability of God
Conclusion

Question 14

“The teleological argument fails to prove that God exists” How valid is this claim? (2021)

Answer 14

Intro
- paley’s argument
- aquinas’ argument
- intelligent design
Conclusion

Question 15

“Aquinas’ argument from motion, contingency and causation proves that God exists.” How valid is this claim ? (2021)

Answer 15

Intro
- motion
- contingency
- causation
Conclusion