Power and authority Flashcards
(16 cards)
Who believed that power was the ‘key to political science’?
Max Weber
What is the classical definition of power?
- Ability of actor to achieve particular outcome
What are the problems with the classical defintion of power?
- Effects may be incidental
- Power can have unintended effects
- Context is important (power is provisional, conditional and relative)
- Power can be latent (easy to measure when exercised, not when it’s not being used - think volcano)
What are the three faces of power?
- Decision-making (overt ∧ directly observable)
- Agenda-setting (ability to keep items off political/voting agenda)
- Preference shaping (structural ideas influence how ∧ if we can think about things)
What are the theoretical perspectives on power?
- Elite theory
- Pluralism
- Marxism
How does elite theory work, in terms of studying power?
- Power is concentrated in an elite
- Elites are drawn from a narrow strate
- Elites circulate
How is elite theory split?
- Classical
- Modern
How does classical elite theory work, in terms of studying power?
Rule of the few due to some innate qualities.
What are the critiques of classical elite theory?
- Methodological individualism (overemphasis on the role of individuals)
- Lack of empirical evidence (just assumed an elite exists)
How does modern elite theory work, in terms of studying power?
Power derived from structural position in society.
Formal authority vs. real (economic) power.
Econ. power is behind the scenes (i.e. agenda setting/preference-shaping)
What are the critiques of modern elite theory?
- Accuracy - where are the boundaries? Is reputation an accurate indicator of power?
- How to actually study an elite?
- Non-falsifiable (i.e. infinite regress) - just because you can’t identify elites, doesn’t mean they are not there
How does pluralism work, in terms of studying power?
- Power dispersed throughout society
- Politics is competitive (different IGs)
- Policy is the outcome of competitive processes
Focus on directly observable power.
How did pluralism evolve?
To neo-pluralism
How do neo-pluralists differ to pluralists?
Take structure/nuance more into account.
- Structural power of business
- Closed networks
- Elite pluralism (i.e. no single elite)
What are the critiques of neo-pluralism?
- Circular reasoning (how are decisions made? -> interests of strongest groups. Who are the strongest groups? -> those in whose interests decisions are made)
- Little recognition of structure beyond the power of business
What do Marxists think is the structural power?
Economic system.