Ppt 1/2 Flashcards

(85 cards)

1
Q

What is a construct

A
  • Constructs are hypothetical, can’t be touched
  • Variables that are not directly observable, they represent behavioral tendencies or complex patterns of behavior and internal processes
  • We can’t see it but we can see evidence or symptoms of a construct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ex of Constructs

A

intelligence, anxiety, color blindness, schizophrenia, border line personality disorder

Ex: depression
Can see sad affect, but not actual depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ex of NOT constructs

A

Emotional intelligence– not a distinct construct even though its really popular

Type A personality

These are useful/heuristics we can understand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Constructs- what we do

A

We sometimes create constructs where there are none.
- We lump things together and don’t see distinct constructs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Popper quote

A

Goal is to “carve nature at its joints”
-discerning what makes up intelligence
- To know is it ‘this’ or ‘that’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Testing Definition

A

“the process of measuring psychologically related variables by means of devices or_ procedures designed to obtain a sample of behavior”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Testing

A

Used to assess constructs

Key to testing: a sample of behavior

“Tests are tools. In the hands of a fool or an unscrupulous person they become pseudoscientific perversions” (Tyler, 1962)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fundamental Attribution Error

A

an individual’s tendency to attribute another’s actions to their character or personality, while attributing their behavior to external situational factors outside of their control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assessment Definition

A

gathering and integration of psychology-related data for the purpose of making a psychological evaluation.

accomplished through the use of tools such as tests, interviews, case studies, behavioral observation, and specially designed apparatuses and measurement procedures”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assessment vs testing

A

Broader concept, not as focused on measuring but instead focuses on understanding ct

We do tests, behavioral observations, interviews to draw conclusion and try to understand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why Do Assessment? 7 reasons

A
  1. Identify or clarify a problem
  2. Determine the best environment for a person
  3. Advance justice
  4. Aid in matching people to opportunities
  5. Help someone better understand themselves
  6. short term therapeutic intervention
  7. *To protect against bias / human thinking errors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Acronym for: why do assessment
Think: Juice drink during as assessment

A

Perry
Enjoys
Juice
On
Unusual
Saturday
Brunches

Problem
Environment
Justice
Opportunities
Understand
Short Term intervention
Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Thinking Error- Altering Information

A

We tend to alter information if it contradicts our beliefs

Find some way to hold onto underlying belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Thinking Error - Confirmation Bias

A

Ask question that might confirm our assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How to manage thinking errors

A

*Mindfulness
*Self observation
*Willingness to have 6th Sense Experiences
*Nomothetic measures can be helpful/essential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Our best defense against inaccurate conclusions

A

Using valid & reliable measures

Guard against bias/blindspots

Using multiple methods of measuring

Blend the various strengths and weaknesses every instrument inevitably has

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

incremental validity (aka efficient use)

A

Incremental validity is a type of validity that is used to determine whether a new psychometric assessment will increase the predictive ability beyond that provided by an existing method of assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Attributes of a Good Test
CLEAR-V acronym

A
  • CLear instructions for administering, scoring and interpreting

*Efficient use (incremental validity)

*Accurate

*Reliability–consistency

*Validity–measures what it purports to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Take Aways from Assessment

A

*Do no harm (non-malfeasance)

*Do good (beneficence)

*Promote autonomy (informed consent)

  • Be just (be fair)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

New Measures in Assessment

A

Wartegg Drawing Completion (CWS)

Adult Attachment Projective

Thurston Cradock Test of Shame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Domains of assessment

A

*Personality assessment (traits and states)

*Intellectual assessment

*Neuropsychological assessment

*Vocational assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How are assessment scores impacted by other variables??

A

Ex: anxiety, cooperativeness, level of distress, luck, etc
BUT
research shows that most of these influences usually account for only a small part of the score variance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is a major goal of psych assessment

A

To reduce/eliminate errors, misattributions,
mistakes in characterizations, inaccurate conclusions, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How to reduce error.misattributions/ mistakes/innacurate conclusions in a test? (14)

A

Use valid & reliable measure

Use multiple methods of measuring

Be aware of thinking errors: anticipate making mistakes

Consider nature of data- what does it mean: (strengths, weaknesses, peculiarities)

Integrate conflicting data

Consider motivations/env of testing

Be sure you can systematically identify characteristics of
condition under consideration

Test indicators & their absence should be directly linked to these characteristics

Reconcile testing results with history

Systematically revise your impressions by considering data that temper your hypothesis

Make predictions of rare events sparingly

Use empirically validated, statistically derived algorithms when available

Use validity scales and symptom validity measures for distortions

Consider and profit from client feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Assessment Feedback
now in code of ethics as mandatory
26
What is intelligence
a construct, but not a unitary construct Open to misuse because it’s a construct
27
Intelligence definition
It is a general label for a group of processes that are inferred from observable behaviors. It is framed in different philosophical assumptions, political agendas, social issues, and legal restriction
28
Italics: Weschler definition of intelligence
“a global concept that involves an individual's ability to act purposefully, think rationally, and deal effectively with the environment."
29
Italics: Sternberg definition of intelligence
“the mental abilities necessary for adaption to, as well as shaping and selection of, any environmental context.”
30
Italics: Gottfredson definition of intelligence
“Intelligence involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings– ”catching on," "making sense”, of things, or “figuring out” what to do (p. 13).
31
Common definitional aspects of intelligence
1. Abstract thinking 2. Learning from experience 3. Solving problems through insight 4. Adjusting to new situations 5. Focusing and sustaining one's abilities to achieve a desired goal
32
Intelligence quotient calculation
Mental Age= MA Chronological age= CA MA-CA= intelligence
33
Binet- Italics
originally made score for placing kids in appropriate level classes Stanford Binet-- when he developed another test with Turman at Stanford University Terman reconceptualized the marker IQ = MA/CA x 100 >> still a problem (MA levels off)
34
Are intellectual disabilities/genius realities?
Yes
35
intelligence is complicated
intelligence is a viable construct-- intellectual disabilities and genius are realities
36
is intelligence a viable construct?
Yes
37
why is it important for psychologists to know about intelligence?
Important to know the state of knowledge in order to not misuse cognitive testing
38
What are the domains of psych assessment
Personality assessment (traits and states) Personality assessment (traits and states) Intellectual assessment Neuropsychological assessment Vocational assessment
39
True ability or characteristics in scores can be influenced by which factors (12)
Test anxiety Willingness to cooperate Level of distress Depression or psychosis Hunger Bathroom needs Sleep deprivation Tendency to agree or disagree Prior experience with the test or coaching Luck Examiner Skills Interaction between examiner/ test-taker (personal characteristics of examiner influence interaction)
40
Why is it important to minimize other factors that can impact scores
to maximize the influence of the intended construct
41
What are the 4 major traditions in approaching intelligence?
psychometric approaches information processing approaches Neuro biological Approaches Developmental Approaches
42
What is the value of theories?
Allows us to discuss aspects of a construct not previously accessible depth and breadth of understanding Useful in certain predictions Motivate effort to operationalize theory
43
what do the 4 major traditions of measuring intelligence represent?
different aspects of investigation-- think of elephant metaphor To understand how each tradition understands intelligence differently and what each tradition has to add??
44
psychometric approach to intelligence
assumes intelligence is a trait in which there are individual differences that are normally distributed it all started with Alfred Binet Two factor theory of intelligence G of intelligence
45
Who introduced g of intelligence
Spearman
46
What is the G and S in intelligence
G= general factor common toall types of intellectual activity S= specific factors to each task
47
Positive Manifold
the idea that all the variables are positively correlated Some portion of the variance of scores on each test attributed to each test attributed to “g”
48
What kind of test is the WAIS IV?
Hierarchical model (both unitary, large, and small specific abilities)
49
Psychometric Models
Three Stratum Model Cattell Horn Carroll Model 5 factor model
50
Three Stratum Model
by Horn/Cattell G gF: Fluid Intelligence-- processing ability gC: Crystallized Intelligence-stored information
51
gF
Fluid Intelligence Dependent on brains efficiency and intactness Enables problem solving, perceiving relationships Primarily non-verbal, culture free Increases until age 14, levels off until 20, then gradually declines after 20
52
gC
Crystallized Intelligence Largely environmentally determined Content oriented (Vocabulary, Information) Relatively permanent and not as susceptible to brain damage Develops from interaction of Gf environment Grows until age 40 then gradually declines
53
CHC model
Merging of two systems (Wechsler and C & H) incorporated several more specialized functions
54
5 Factor Model
Keith factors Verbal Comprehension Index Working Memory Index Visual Spatial Index Fluid Reasoning Index Processing Speed Index
55
Keith Factors- not sure if we need to know this...
5 factor model Gc- crystallized intelligence SI, VC, and CO subtests Gv: visual processing BD and SS subtests Gf: fluid reasoning PCn and MR subtests Gsm: short-term memory DS and LS subtests Gs: processing speed (Gs) SS and CD subtests.
56
Heritibility Estimates in intelligence-- TWIN STUDIES
Heritability estimates range .30 to .50 (and higher) The heritability estimates increase as people get older
57
VCI
Verbal Comprehension - Vocabulary (VO) -Similarities (SI) -Information (IN) Supp- Comprehension (CO)
58
PRI
Perceptual Reasoning PICTURES - Block Design (BD) - Matrix Reasoning (MR) - Visual Puzzles (VP) Supp: Figure Weights (FW) Supp: Picture Completion (PC)
59
WMI
Working Memory MATH - Digit Span (DS) -Arithmetic (AR) Supp: Letter Number Sequ. (LN)
60
PSI
Processing Speed Index SUPPLEMENTAL PACKETS - Symbol Search (SS) -Coding (CO) Supp: Cancellation (CA)
61
WAIS IV setup
4 factor model VCI: Verbal Comprehension - Vocabulary (VC) -Similarities (SI) -Information (IN) Supp- Comprehension (CO) PRI: Perceptual Reasoning - Block Design - Matrix Reasoning - Visual Puzzles Supp: Figure Weights Supp: Picture Completion WMI: Working Memory - Digit Span -Arithmetic Supp: Letter Number Sequ. PSI: Processing Speed Index - Symbol Search -Coding Supp: Cancellation
62
what is G
general factors common to all types of intellectual activity
63
Information Processing Approaches
Focuses on processes rather than content How information is received, stored, manipulated, transformed - both structural and functional Structural (sensory reception, STM/LTM Functional- manipulations and transformations
64
What is IQ associated with in regards to processing speed and correlations?
speed of apprehension, scanning, retrieving, and responding to stimuli correlations increase as tasks become more complex
65
Choice Reaction time
correlates -0.4 w/ IQ
66
Who created Triarchic theory?
Sternberg
67
Triathic Theory
Sternberg Triarchic Theory Intelligence involves: 1. Metacomponents--planning, monitoring, evaluating 2. Performance components--administering instructions of metacomponents 3. Knowledge-acquisition components--learning how to do something in the first place
68
Neurological/Biological Approaches
anatomical and physiological underpinnings for intelligence
69
Thorndike
Neurological/Biological Approach “g”= total # of modifiable neural connections Wondered if g depends on neural efficiency of brain
70
Thorndike G questions
Is the “quality of protoplasm” effect IQ? Does neural efficiency promote IQ OR does IQ help people find faster ways OR both?
71
Luria
Neurological/Biological Approach PASS System Brain is differentiated into systems of functional units that form an integrated whole. 3 main units Arousal (brain stem and midbrain) Sensory input (temporal, parietal, occipital) Executive (frontal)
72
Luria Pass system
Cognitive functions involve: Planning Attention Successive processing Simultaneous processing
73
Naglieri
Naglieri et al have worked to develop a measure of intelligence based on these fundamental brain functions PASS Planning Attention Successive processing Simultaneous Processing
74
Future directions of neuro-biological approaches
Epigenetics
75
Epigenetics
Neuro-Biological approach DNA and environmental factors both important for intelligence portions of DNA are deactivated or activated by experience gene activity is modified by this chemical process without changing the genetic info A type of “long term memory”, preserving environmental effects/cues on genes long after those cues have disappeared This is effectively how stem cells are guided to develop into different types of tissue—by having only a portion of the DNA active. Each type of tissue has characteristic methylation patterns
76
What does epigentics tell us about nature vs nurture
its both. Environmental factors can influence which parts of our genetic propensities are activated or deactivated.
77
Developmental Approaches
Concerned with the quality of response or reasoning behind answers. Piaget -(1950) studied children Not concerned so much with right or wrong as why right or wrong Noticed patterns of responses related to different age groups (as did Binet)
78
Piaget 4 conclusions
Developmental Approach 1. Mental growth follows definite patterns and is non-random 2. There are qualitative differences in thinking among ages 3. Development leads to new cognitive structures and abilities 4. Mental growth completes in late adolescence
79
Piaget view on intelligence
Intelligence is a developmental phenomenon of adaptation in which we construct reality in increasingly symbolic terms (Four stages of cognitive development)
80
Piaget- what do people do to reorganize structures to adapt to their environments?
assimilation/accomodation assimilation: fitting things into our schema Accommodation: adjusting our schema to accommodate facts
81
Vygosky
Developmental Approach Vygotsky's Theory-- Argued all intellectual abilities are social in origin. ”Zone of proximal development" -- Static testing -- **Dynamic testing-
82
Zone of proximal development
Vygotsky level of performance attainable with help from adult
83
Dynamic Testing
Vygotsky examiner provides guided and graded feedback -- Indicates child's latent potential ability to profit from guided instruction could serve as a measure of one’s “zone of proximal development” (difference between their developed abilities and their latent capacities) May reveal cognitive skills not revealed by static testing
84
dynamic testing process
Children are given feedback to help them improve their performance [scaffolding], so testing and teaching are treated as continuous Thus, directly measuring one’s ability to learn, not the product of past learning Especially important when unequal opportunity to learn in the past BUT dynamic testing is very labor intensive and has not made much progress in the last 40 years
85
what does therapeutic assessment use?
Scaffolding