Practice Qs Flashcards
Geary & Smith, a firm of accountants, acted on the audit of Musica Ltd and, owing to the negligence of the audit team manager, misrepresented the company’s financial position. Geary & Smith had known that Moments Musicaux plc had been promised a set of the audited accounts as soon as they were available in order to assist it in proposing a takeover bid price that would be acceptable to the shareholders in Musica Ltd.
Can Moments Musicaux plc sue Geary & Smith in the tort of negligence?
a) No, because its loss is purely financial and it should have carried out its own professional investigation into the accuracy of the accounts.
b) No, because no duty of care is owed to potential investors, only to the existing body of shareholders as a whole.
c) Yes, because when a takeover is anticipated, a special relationship arises between accountants and all recipients of the accounts.
d) Yes, because Moments Musicaux plc was a bidder known to Geary & Smith to be highly likely to rely on the accounts.
d
The facts are similar to Galoo Ltd v Bright Grahame Murray 1995. In such circumstances, the court is likely to consider that the accounts were prepared for the purpose of assisting the takeover and
not just for audit purposes.
Derry plans to incorporate his business, a sports shop on Bromley High Street, as Sports International Ltd, but his business partner, Thelma, is worried about the choice of name. She seeks your advice on two points
a) Is the word ‘International’ in the proposed name prohibited?
b) Could Thelma, who will own 60% of the shares in the new company, ensure a voluntary change of name at a later date?
a) No
But the approval of the Secretary of State is required and is unlikely to be given in this case
b) No.
A special resolution (75%) is required for a change of name.
Are the following statements true or false?
a) Public companies must publish the results of polls at general meetings on a website.
b) Proxies cannot be included in determining whether a quorum is present.
a) False.
This is true for quoted companies only.
b) False.
Edwina has been appointed as administrator for Eggsell Ltd.
Within how many weeks is she obliged to hold a creditors’ meeting (assuming that no
exceptions apply and that she is required to hold one)?
6 weeks.
10 weeks.
12 weeks.
3 months.
10 weeks
No creditors’ meeting is necessary where the administrator considers there to be insufficient property to make a distribution to unsecured creditors over and above the ‘ring-fenced asset distribution’ set out in the Insolvency Act 1986 and at least 10% creditors do not require one.
Within what time period must a private company give notice of its refusal to register a requested transfer of its shares?
2 months. It must also give reasons for its refusal
In some cases, a worker may intend to disclose wrongdoing by his employer to someone outside the workplace, for example the police or the NCA. In such cases, the disclosure will be protected by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 if it is reasonable in all the circumstances and is not made for personal gain. In addition, the worker will need to satisfy one of several other criteria in order to
receive the protection of the Act (assuming that the matter disclosed is a qualifying disclosure within the Act).
Which one of the following is not one of those criteria and will not, therefore, afford the statutory protection?
a) Reasonably believing that he would be victimised if he raised the matter internally.
b) The fact that he had already raised the matter internally.
c) The fact that the matter was of a serious criminal nature.
d) Reasonably believing that a cover-up was likely and there was no prescribed person to whom disclosure could be made.
c
Is not a minimum criteria
As a general rule, accountants have a duty to report any suspicion or knowledge of money laundering that they have, or face criminal liability under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
However, does this duty to report apply in the following situations?
a) Where the accountant is acting as an insolvency practitioner?
b) Where the accountant is involved in giving tax advice and the alleged offence is committed by a third party and not their client?
a) Yes
b) Yes
Can an independent contractor claim wrongful dismissal?
No, only employees can
What are the three critical aspects of a contract of employment
- Personal service
- Control over employee
- Mutuality of obligations
Hilary is employed by Howard in his restaurant. Howard deducts tax and national insurance from her monthly salary. She is entitled to paid sick leave of up to 10 weeks per year. She is given at least 48 hours’ notice of when she is required to work and Howard is required to ask Hilary to work before offering the work to the other non-permanent staff. Hilary wears a uniform provided by Howard, bearing the name of the restaurant.
Is Hilary an employee or an independent contractor?
a) She is an employee because she is paid after deductions for tax and national insurance.
b) She is an independent contractor because she works for Howard on an as-and-when-required basis.
c) She is an employee because she wears a uniform supplied by Howard and is entitled to sick leave.
d) She is an independent contractor because she is free to work for other employers when she is not working for Howard.
b
The obligation to work as-and-when required means that mutuality of obligations is not present and
she cannot, therefore, be an employee.
Edward has been working for Claire for six and a half years. His contract provides for his employment to be terminated on the giving of one month’s notice. Claire hands him written notice terminating his employment ‘one month from now’.
Has sufficient notice been given?
a) Yes. Notice has been given in accordance with Edward’s contract.
b) Yes. Edward’s length of continuous employment entitles him to not less than one month’s notice.
c) No. Edward is entitled to not less than six weeks’ notice.
d) No. Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the minimum period of notice to which Edward is
entitled is six and a half weeks.
c
Half weeks do not apply
Is an employer obliged to provide a written statement of the reasons for a dismissal?
No - not unless the employee requests one within 14 days of their dismissal
Under the Employment Rights Act 1996 lack of capability on the part of the employee is a potentially fair reason for dismissal which can be put forward by an employer, subject to the requirement that the employer must have acted reasonably in the circumstances.
Which of the following is NOT protected by the statutory provisions regulating unfair
dismissal on the grounds of lack of capability?
a) A part-time employee who has worked for Primefoods Ltd for 3 years.
b) A full-time employee who has worked for Fastfoods Ltd for 6 months and then Primefoods Ltd for 18 months after Fastfoods’ business was transferred to Primefoods Ltd.
c) A full-time employee whose contract of employment requires them to work for Primefoods Ltd’s sister company in France.
d) An employee who has worked for Primefoods Ltd for 3 years but during that time spent 6 months
in the armed services.
c
The Employment Rights Act 1996 originally provided that employees who ordinarily work outside Great Britain were excluded. Although this provision was repealed in 1999, generally speaking, it can be said that those who work outside Great Britain are excluded from the Act’s protection. (The
judiciary now has the task of deciding, on a case by case basis, whether an employee is excluded, generally based on the strength of the link with Great Britain.)
Can a registered company be
a) A data controller?
b) A data subject?
a) Yes
b) No - only individuals can be data subjects
Pamela and Rhiannon work for Hammer House Ltd and have just been told by their boss that they are no longer required and should clear their desks immediately. Their contracts provide for one month’s notice and no wrongdoing has been alleged. There is no question of redundancy. Pamela has been working at Hammer House for two years and Rhiannon for nine months.
a) Can Pamela claim for both unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal?
b) Can Rhiannon claim wrongful dismissal in an employment tribunal?
a) Yes
b) Yes
Assuming her claim is for less than a prescribed amount, employment tribunals have a concurrent jurisdiction with the courts. (She cannot claim unfair dismissal, because she has insufficient continuous employment in accordance with the Employment Rights Act 1996).
True or false;
Under criminal law, the victim of the crime is not entitled to damages from the guilty party
True
Damages is not an available remedy under criminal law
All of the following contracts except one must be in the form of a deed. Which one is the exception?
a) Contract for the transfer of land
b) Contract for consumer credit
c) Contract for a lease over 3 years
d) Contract for the regular payment of a donation to charity
b) A contract for consumer credit must be in writing but not as a deed
Prunella agrees to pay Paul £500 if Paul will landscape Phillip’s garden. There is no agency relationship and the rights of third parties act does not apply.
Who may enforce the terms of the contract?
a) Prunella, Paul and Phillip
b) Prunella and Phillip only
c) Pail and Phillip only
d) Prunella and Paul only
d) Prunella and Paul only
Phillip has given no consideration and is not a party in the contract, thus, he has no rights to enforce
Is the payment of £1 per year as rent for a house valid consideration?
Yes - consideration need not be adequate but it must be sufficient
True or false;
Acceptance must always be communicated to the offeror in order to be effective
False
This can be waived & acceptance inferred from conduct
True or false;
a) Anticipatory breaches may be implied from conduct and need not be explicit
b) If an innocent party elects to treat the contract as discharged, they waive the right to claim damages from the party at fault
a) True
b) False
They may treat the contract as discharged AND sue for damages
True or false;
a) Damages for breach of contract are primarily intended to restore the injured party to the same position they were in at the time the contract was made
b) The claimant is required to take every opportunity to mitigate their loss arising as a consequence of a breach of contract
a) False
Damages are intended to put the party in the position they would have been had the contract been performed
b) False
The claimant is required to taker only reasonable steeps not ones that carry undue risk or that are discreditable
All of the following statements are examples of lawful excuses for not performing under a contract except one, which?
a) Performance by one party is rejected by another
b) Non-performance occurs but is agreed by both parties
c) One party makes it impossible to perform
d) Performance is impossible when the contract is made
d) If performance is impossible when the contract is MADE then there is usually no contract at all
Which of the following is not necessary to be shown by a claimant in order to succeed in an action for negligence
a) That the defendant owed them a duty of care
b) That the defendant was in breach of a duty of care
c) That the claimant suffered injury, damage or loss as a result of the breach of that duty of care
d) That the damage was not too remote
d) Whether the damage was too remote is a matter for the court to decide in assessing damages once negligence has been shown