Pre- & Post- Transition Metals Flashcards
(55 cards)
transition metal
an element from the d-block that normally forms complexes with an incomplete d-shell
pre-transition metals
metals before central d-block
A group metals
- in group 1, group 2, group 3 + Lanthanides
-also includes Al
group A elements: largely hard (but with exceptions)
post-transition metals
B group transition metals
- elements in group 11-12
- metals in group 13-16
Group B elements: largely soft
hard and soft acids and bases
hard prefers hard
soft prefers soft
in this definition, acid and base refer to lewis acid and lewis base
hard and soft refers to the polarisability of a metal ion or species
- hard ion: does not deform much when brought up to ion of opposite charge
- soft ion: readily deforms when brought up to ion of opposite charge
lewis acid
electron pair acceptor (Na+)
lewis base
electron pair donor (F-, NH3)
hard (for lewis acids)
~ pre-transition metals are hard
~ transition metals in high oxidation states are hard
a high oxidation state would be a charge of +3 or higher
- however, for 2nd and 3rd row transition metals, sometimes higher oxidation states are needed
- Pt4+ is soft
soft (for lewis acids)
~ post-transition metals are soft
~ transition metals in low oxidation states are soft
hard (for lewis base)
F, N, O donors are typically all hard bases
F-, -OH, NH3, RNH2, ROH
soft (for lewis base)
all other donors are soft bases
S, Se, Te, As, P donors are typically all soft bases
H2S, PR3, H3R3, TeR2
determine if transition metal ion is hard/soft
look at the stability of the corresponding halide
if we have: F- > Cl- > Br- > I-
metal cation is hard
if we have: F- < Cl- < Br- < I-
metal cation is soft
stability of complex determined by looking at the stability constant (Kn, Bn)
Kn - stability constant
for a metal ion (cation) combining with a ligand (lewis base) the equilibrium constant is called the stability constant or formation constant
addition of ligand occurs stepwise
K1 - first ligand addition
K2 - second ligand addition
βn - overall stability constant
considers adding all the ligands in one go (rather than stepwise)
βn = K1 x K2 x K3 … Kn
trends in stability constants
if stability constant for a reaction is high, then that complex will be readily formed and is encompassed by our definition of a strong complex via HSAB principle
it is commonly observed that the stepwise stability constants lie in the order:
K1 > K2 > K3 > K4 … Kn
stepwise reduction in Kn values
consider reactions in water and the number of sites available for a displacement reaction
K1 - 6 sites
K2 - 5 sites
K3 - 4 sites
K4 - 3 sites
K5 - 2 sites
K6 - 1 sites
less sites available for L - therefore, statistically less likely to happen
exceptions to stepwise reduction in Kn values
occur when there is a structural change at the metal (i.e. 6 to 4 coordination)
occur due to variation in high spin - low spin
occur due to changes associated wth the John-Teller distortion (Cu2+ ~ John-Teller ion)
changes to stability constant when structural change occurs at metal
stability constant for Cd with Br-
-logK1 = 1.58
-logK2 = 0.54
-logK3 = 0.06
-logK4 = 0.37
increase in 4th stability constant - this anomaly suggests a structural change at the metal
[Cd(H2O)6]2+ is a 6-coordinate complex but Br- is a larger ligand than H2O
stability constant K4 relates to :
[CdBr3(OH)3]- + Br- ⇌ [CdBr4] + 3H2O
OCTAHEDRAL ⇌ TETRAHEDRAL
addition of 4th Br- ligand is favourable (increase in entropy ~ 2 to 4 molecules) - as Br- is so large, there is not enough space for H2O molecules when 4th ligand is added
the chelate effect
K1 for a bidentate ligand (en) compared to β2 of corresponding di-ligand complex (diamine)
logK1 > logβ2
essentially, the same two Cu-N bonds are formed ~ but the chelated complex is more favoured
ΔS is large and positive for the en addition
ΔG more negative
reattachment of chelate ring
loss of one arm of the chelate ring - can easily reattach due to high local concentration of the end of the molecule
reattachment best for smaller ring sizes
chelate effect maximised for smaller ring sizes
chelate effect maxmised for ring sizes of 5 and 6 and it virtually non existant above a ring size of 9 atoms
macrocylic ligand
ligand that has a ring or a caged structure
macrocyclic effect
the enhanced stability of complexes with macrocyclic ligands compared to their open chain analogues
arises from changes in configurational entropy
- the open chain analogue loses a lot of configurational entropy (rotation around bonds) on complexation
- the macrocyclic ligand loses less configurational entropy as it is already in ring form
there is a cavity size effect for macrocyclic ligands
K+ fits best in the cavity for 18 crown 6
Rb+ fits best in cavity for valimaycin
the size selection properties of macrocyclic ligands can be used in the separation of various metal ions
macrocylic ligands that are three dimensional are known as cryptands
solubilities of ionic substances
solubility of ionic salts related to four main factors
relating to change in ΔH
1. lattice energy lose on dissolution
2. solvation energy gain on dissolving
relating to change in ΔS
3. the entropy gain by the ions moving in solution
4. the entropy lost by the solvent molecules