Preliminary References 1 Flashcards
learning obj?
- To describe the purpose of Article 267 TFEU
- To describe and apply the test of what constitutes a national court to unseen material- prob q quite stuff lots of test in article 267
- To critically assess the discretion left to lower national courts in asking for a reference - so treaty make diff types of national ct diff obl duties and sicretion what t critically asses that discretion
- To critically assess the position of preliminary reference in the EU’s constitutional legal order- this is proecdural law but wouldnt have suprem without this procedure -
what is this topic essentially about?
Cjeu says ask me q overtime reject q and treat ms not so well
This lec links to procedural – and links to previous ones
learn
learn how to read treaty
actions you take in national courts?
Actions in the national courts
Individual action against a State to enforce rights- direct effect
Individual action against a State for damages - against state
Individual action against another individual- horitzontal direct effect
actions in the eu courts?
Actions in the EU courts
Judicial review of EU measures (Article 263 TFEU)- action for annulment - only launched in general ct
Damages against the EU (Article 340 TFEU) - dont cover that much on this course allows u to sue eu if breaches ur rights
Enforcement proceedings by the Commission against a State (Articles 258-260 TFEU) - if comm think uk done something wrong bring action against it
what were talking about today?
Preliminary reference procedure
Article 267 TFEU
-Abriding art-article 267 prelim reference procedure- action starts in national ct- up to ecj back to national court -
what shall we do we stat book?
find Article 267 TFEU: - page? -
art tfeu 1st part?
The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:
(a) the interpretation of the Treaties;
(b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions….
Top is what ct can do
art tfeu 2nd part?
Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.
Middle – any court may use this procedure (option it’s a discretion and that’s 1 tier of cts)
art tfeu 3rd part?
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.
Bottom- 2nd tier of cts some cts have discretion some cts and some obligation
Why study Article 267 TFEU?
Why? This will be key difference in our rels pro Brexit- this process will not exist- but why cos tell something abut nature of eu law and changes that are coming – way ecj grafted their own position- they have abused this article toc reate a whole legal order
Why study Article 267 TFEU?- -but they pursue what?
But they purse that hierchy that power insituinal power from a weak absis cos relying on national cts using this- if alienates national cts they will refer and if don’t refer ecj cant make law- ecj narrow tight rope in pleasing national cts but not subserv= rels btw both
Why study Article 267 TFEU?- consitution/judicial order?
- Constitution/judicial order making (state liability/direct effect/indirect effect/supremacy etc).
Why study Article 267 TFEU?- what about national courts?
- All national courts at all times are applying EU law
- 1st point – therefore need to be mech for them to resolve questions over eu – cos whats danger allowing national cts decing interp themselves – danger = inconsistency why is tht bad
Why study Article 267 TFEU? - rels btw ecj and national cts?
- Relationship between the ECJ and national courts
- 2nd – this whole article defines rels –not always been easy rels – so this rels is so strained now that if national ct doesn’t make one of these ref when should do what could u do – u could sue state state lainility
Why study Article 267 TFEU? - bridge between ecj and national courts?
- Bridge between ECJ and national courts
- 3rd bridge – very unsual for ecj and national ct to talk – that KEY DIFF btw eu law and most other international agreements
Why study Article 267 TFEU?- what about uniformity?
- Uniformity (Drodzi)
4- allows for uniformtity make sure every ct applying law in same way
Why study Article 267 TFEU? what is essential for?
- ‘Essential for the preservation of the [Union] character of the law established by the Treaty.’ (Rheinmuehlen)
5 and essential for preservation union char- esstentiall natioanlc ts bring with them national understanding concept- so concept of what company is- concept access to justice is- ecj know treaty has special eu meaning and need to preserve by making sure ecj has last say
Why study Article 267 TFEU? - what is next point after essential?
- ‘Any gap in the system…could undermine the effectiveness of the provisions of the Treaty.’ (Rheinmuehlen)
- 6 its an effectiveness argument aswell – did that in stat liability-these principles come up time and time again- start to see underping cts juris in area- direct effect indirect horizontal and icninetal effect, state liability
The way to think about preliminary references (structure)?- no.1?
- What is the purpose of the preliminary reference procedure?
- What is it trying to achieve ? – how effective is enforcement proceeding wnsuring it complies etc – 1 that makes 60 into 70- estab framework for analysis – need to know why u think its effective- what is your underlying yardstick what are u emasruing it against to say its effective- if it achieves its purpose very well then it is effective- if not it is not effective – so try to come up with ways with measuring effectiveness – use words like more /less/very/lesser/more than – nothing worse than saying advantages or disadvantages
This is my bench mark- this is how I messuring it – Ive measured it – heres the outcome
The way to think about preliminary references (structure)?-no.2?
- Who may make preliminary references?
- Who must- so talking about every ct and some ct arg
What can they ask – what qs can u ask ecj and what cant u ask – some in treaty some in case law and come across those
The way to think about preliminary references (structure)? - no.3?
- Who must make preliminary references? What happens if they fail to make a reference?
- Who may make prelim- q of what is national ct and tribunal under eu law- cos those only body can make this ref
The way to think about preliminary references (structure)?- no.4?
- What can they ask?
- Who must- so talking about every ct and some ct arg
The way to think about preliminary references (structure)?- no.5?
- What can’t they ask?
What can they ask – what qs can u ask ecj and what cant u ask – some in treaty some in case law and come across those