Present Possessory Estates Flashcards
(38 cards)
Estates in Land - Overview
- possessory interests -> can be present or future
- can be freeholds (possession under some legal title or right to hold) or nonfreeholds (mere possession, such as leases)
- DISTINGUISH FROM NONPOSSESSORY INTERESTS (easements, profits, covenants, and servitudes)
Present Possessory Estate - Basics
- an interest that gives the holder the right to present possession
Categories of Present Possessory Estates to Know
- fee simple absolute
- defeasible fee
- life estate
- for each of these, make sure you know a) what language creates it and b) what are its distinguishing characteristics (devisable? descendible? alienable?)
Devisable - Basic Meaning
- capable of passing by will
Descendible - Basic Meaning
- capable of passing by statutes of intestacy if holder dies “intestate” (without a will)
Alienable - Basic Meaning
- capable of transfer inter vivos (during lifetime)
Fee Simple Absolute - Distinguishing Characteristics
- absolute ownership of indefinite/potentially infinite duration
- freely transferable
- devisable by will
- descendible through intestacy
Fee Simple Absolute - Language to Create
- “To A” or “To A and his heirs”
- generally presumed in the absence of express contrary intent -> language of “and his heirs” is not strictly necessary
*note that even if it says “his heirs”, the heirs have 0 interest (a living person technically doesn’t have heirs, just heirs apparent, and A can transfer whenever to somebody else w/o depriving the heirs of anything)
Defeasible Fees - Overall
- fee simples with a catch -> can be terminated upon the happening of a stated event
-> defeasible essentially means capable of forfeiture - these estates are fee simples in the sense that their duration is uncertain + potentially infinite, BUT not absolute b/c there’s some kind of condition that makes the property subject to a risk of forfeiture
Types of Defeasible Fees
3 core ones to note:
- fee simple determinable
- fee simple subject to condition subsequent fee simple subject to an executory interest
Fee Simple Determinable - Basic Concept
- terminates upon the happening of a stated event and AUTOMATICALLY reverts to the GRANTOR
Fee Simple Determinable - Language to Create
- created by durational language
-> “to A FOR SO LONG AS”
-> “to A WHILE”
-> “to A DURING”
-> “to A UNTIL” - need clear durational language -> express language limiting the duration of the estate
- WON’T create with mere expressions of motive or purpose (ex: “for the purpose of” or “to be used for”)
Fee Simple Determinable - Distinguishing Characteristics
- transferable
- devisable by will
- descendible through intestacy
- BUT throughout all of the above, the interest is ALWAYS subject to the attached condition
-> the interest can be conveyed, but whoever takes it does so subject to the estate’s being terminated by the specified event
-> if the stated condition is violated, forfeiture is automatic
Fee Simple Determinable - Accompanying Future Interest
- possibility of reverter
-> held by the GRANTOR - one and only one future interest attached to fee simple determinable
- when grantor conveys fee simple determinable, the grantor AUTOMATICALLY retains a possibility of reverter
-> that possibility of reverter is transferable, devisable by will, and descendible by intestacy
Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent (and Right of Entry) - Basic Concept
- an estate in which the grantor reserves the right to terminate the estate upon the happening of a stated event
-> DOESN’T automatically terminate -> grantor must take some action
Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent - Creation
Two main ingredients:
1) use of conditional words, such as “upon condition that”, “but if”, and “if it happens that” AND
2) an explicit statement of the grantor’s right to re-enter
- ex: “to A, but if X event occurs, grantor reserves the right to re-enter and retake”
Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent - Distinguishing Characteristics
- NOT automatically terminated if the stated condition occurs
-> GRANTOR DECIDES
-> occurrence of the condition gives grantor right to cut the estate short at their prerogative
What happens if conveyance contains both durational language AND power of termination?
- likely construed as creating fee simple subject to a condition subsequent
-> the forfeiture is optional at the grantor’s election rather than automatic - policy disfavors forfeiture of estates
Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent - Accompanying Future Interest
- in GRANTOR
- right of entry, aka power of termination
- must be expressly reserved + doesn’t arise automatically
- most courts hold that rights of entry are NOT transferable inter vivos, but most states agree they are devisable by will, and all states agree they are descendible through intestacy
Fee Simple Subject to an Executory Interest - Basic Concept
- fee simple terminates upon the happening of a stated event and then passes to a third party rather than reverting to the grantor or giving the grantor right to terminate
- third party has executory interest
Fee Simple Subject to an Executory Interest - Language of Creation
- look for third party who will take upon forfeiture of a fee simple estate
- ex: “to A, but if X event occurs, then to B”
Fee Simple Subject to an Executory Interest - Distinguishing Characteristics
- just like the fee simple determinable, only now, if the condition occurs, the estate is automatically forfeited in favor of someone other than the grantor
Fee Simple Subject to an Executory Interest - Accompanying Future Interest
- shifting executory interest accompanies the fee simple subject to an executory interest
Rules of Construction for Defeasible Fees
- words of desire, hope, or intention do not create a defeasible fee
-> ex: “with the hope that”, “for the purpose of”, “with the expectation that” NOT enough
-> book notes that courts generally disfavor restrictions on free land use -> won’t find defeasible fees w/o clear language - absolute restraints on alienation are void
- conditions and limitations violating public policy are void
-> typically struck down if purpose is to penalize marriage + encourage divorce, though could be upheld if purpose is to give support until marriage or in event of divorce