Prev Med 2 Flashcards

1
Q

sample vs pop + ex

A

subset of pop (pts w/ high bp managed by fam med dr in Montgomery County; women 21-50yo in NRV Free Clinic in Christiansburg) vs entire ppl (all pts w/ high bp in VA; all adult women)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

sample types: simple random vs systemic sampling vs stratified vs cluster vs convenience vs quota vs theoretical

A

q member of pop has equal chance of being selected vs samples = selected over fixed pattern or time interval vs when known diff exists, samples = taken from each category that are proportional to their vol in total pop vs used when pop is known to be relatively unvarying vs selects most readily avail members of pop vs takes %age of pop vs Selecting cases for its potential representation of a
theoretical construct (incidents, slices of life, time
period, or people)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why use sample?

A

time limitations, cost of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

representative sample

A

how sample = selected, how recruitment for participation = done, how ppl = retained and provide clues to whether sample represents pop of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

variables: quantitative vs qualitative

A

determine relationship b/w IV and DV in pop; can be descriptive (subjects measured once, est associations b/w variables) or experimental (subjects measured before & after tx) vs in-depth understanding of human behavior and reasons governing human behavior, relies on reasons behind various aspects of behavior; used in social sciences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

random variable

A

anything capable of being measured; data, observations, measurements, indicators, characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

data types: categorical vs continuous

A

nominal (counted data, no scale or rank; ex: blood groups A/B/O/AB or eye color w/ numbered assignment like 1 = blue, 2 = brown, 3 = green); ordinal (order data if 2+ categories, ranked; ex: after tx pt can improve/stay same/become worse, or severity of illness can be minor/moderate/major); dichotomous/binary (counts in whole numbers, no decimals, implies which direction = favorable; ex: nml/abnml, well/sick, living/dead) vs measurements of any value along continuous scale, yes decimals; ex: baby birth wt, length of time to return lab test result, pt height, temp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

descriptive statistics

A

simple graphical numerical techniques to summarize info about data; involves pop, sample, statistical inference (how info in sample can draw conclusions about pop), point estimate (single value used to estimate pop parameter), measures of center, measures of dispersion/spread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

measures of center vs measures of dispersion/spread

A

represents location of data; mean, median, mode vs represents variability of data ie. spread of distribution; variance (measures variability in sample by mean of squared deviations), standard dev (measures variability away from its mean), range (diff b/w max and min value), interquartile range (diff b/w 25th and 75th percentiles; for skewed distribution)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

know how to calculate standard dev w/ 68, 95, 99% confidence interval

A

yep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

standard error vs confidence level vs margin of error

A

measure of variation by estimating probable error of sample mean to pop mean; ID sampling error in sampling process; standard dev/sqrt(sample size) vs you’re 95% confident that true mean in a pop is b/w [mean - 2 standard errors] and [mean + 2 standard errors] vs values above and below sample statistic in a confidence interval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

nml distribution

A

continuous distribution, unimodal (mean/median/mode = same value), empirical rule (68% of data w/in 1 SD of mean, 95% of data w/in 2 SD of mean, 99% of data w/in 3 SD of mean)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

know what L and R skewed distributions look like and where mean/median/mode goes

A

Lecture 10, slide 8&9. also unimodal (b/c one hump)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

general def of hypothesis testing

A

sci inquiry into connection b/w cause and effect, sci method to test validity of claim about pop being studied, hypothesis statement specifies characteristics/parameters of process like location or spread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

goal of hypothesis testing

A

to see if there is sufficient statistical evidence to reject null hypothesis and accept alt hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

5 steps of hypothesis testing

A
  1. develop null and alat hypotheses
  2. est appropriate alpha lvl
  3. perform test of statistical significance on collected data
  4. compare p-value from test w/ alpha
  5. conclude result (reject null when p < alpha, fail to reject null when p > alpha)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

know how to set up null and alt hypotheses

A

Lecture 10, slide 16-18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

alpha lvl vs p value

A

highest risk of making false pos error that PI is willing to accept (if p = 0.05 –> PI accepts 5% risk of being in error when rejecting null) vs probability of obtaining more extreme values than observed test statistic, given null is true; probability of obtaining the result by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what to think about for statistical vs clinical significance

A

when p < alpha –> reject null and favor alt; but doesn’t mean it’s worth continuing study or that it’s clinically significant vs does benefit > risk for your pt? is info relevant to your pt? is there practical importance for tx effects?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

factors affecting sample size

A

what size effect are you looking for? (takes larger sample size to find small effect than big effect); what’s the significance lvl? (you need smaller lvl for larger sample size); how much variability? (if you expects lots of variation, you need larger sample size); how much power? (if you want more power/statistically significant, you need larger sample size)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

factors affecting power

A

effect size (larger effect size –> better chances of finding it using same resources), significance lvl (larger effect size & sample size –> alpha and power inc; power = 1-beta), sample size (larger sample size –> power inc), pop SD (more variable data –> larger sample size needed or else power dec)

22
Q

what does Power answer?

A

if null = false, what’s the probability that data from experiment will reject null? ie. finding a significant effect when one does exist

23
Q

degrees of freedom

A

of indep pieces of info that went into calculating estimate; # of values that are free to vary in a data set

24
Q

type I vs II errors

A

alpha error, false pos (you said there was a sig diff but there actually wasn’t –> you take the “risk” when erroneously rejecting null) vs beta error, false neg

25
Q

what are the 4 questions to determine which stat test to use?

A

what’s the type of data? are observations indep or dep? what’s the data distribution (any normality)? how many variables are investigated (2 variables => bivariate analysis, >2 variables => multivariable analysis)?

26
Q

IV vs DV

A

represents quant manipulated in experiment; exposure, risk factor, predictor/regressor/explanatory vs quantity depends on IV that’s being manipulated; outcome, target, criterion

27
Q

ex of parametric vs non parmetric tests

A

compares means; unpaired/student’s t-test, paired t-test, ANOVA, Pearson coeff vs compares medians; wilcoxon rank sum/MannWhitney U test, wilcoxon signed rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman coeff, chi square

28
Q

when to use parametric vs nonparametric test?

A

when collected data uses ratio or interval scale, nml distribution vs when nothing is known about parameters of variable, small sample size, nominal or ordinal data, doesn’t rely on mean or SD, non nml distribution (bimodal, outliers)

29
Q

student t-test

A

look at diff in means b/w 2 groups

30
Q

wilcoxon rank sum test

A

order groups from low to high and rank them, then compare medians to see if one pop = larger than the other

31
Q

paired t-test vs wilcoxon signed ranked test

A

look at diff in means w/in same group (before/after), when data = nmlly distributed vs look at diff in medians w/in same group, when data = not nmlly distributed

32
Q

ANOVA vs Kruskal Wallis test

A

look at diff b/w 2+ groups, good for categorical data; but need further testing to see which specific groups were significantly diff vs look at diff b/w 2+ groups when data = not nmlly distributed

33
Q

chi square test vs fisher’s exact test

A

uses 2x2 table, compares proportions for tx using ratio of actual to expected vs uses 2x2 table for small sample size (<5 observations)

34
Q

pearson coeff vs spearman coeff

A

looks for corr/similarity b/w 2 variables, for nmlly distributed continuous data vs looks for corr/similarity b/w 2 variables, for non nmlly distributed continuous + ordinal data, for outlier in data

35
Q

r = -1 vs 1 meaning in corr

A

sign = direction of corr (pos or neg corr), number = magnitude/strength of association (strong or weak)

36
Q

corr coeff values representing weak vs moderate vs strong corr

A

0-0.3 vs 0.31-0.7 vs >0.7

37
Q

confounding variable

A

2 variables may be strongly correlated but both can actually be caused by 3rd variable => confounding variable

38
Q

corr vs regression

A

assume no causal relationship or association vs assumes 1 variable = dep on the other

39
Q

linear regression: y = mx + b

A

m = slope, regression coeff
x = IV
b = intercept, where line cuts y-axis
y = DV

40
Q

coefficent of determination (r^2)

A

in corr; how much variability in DV is explained by variability in IV

41
Q

ordinary least squares regression vs logistic regression

A

used for continuous variables like height; simple (1 variable) and multiple (mult variables) regression vs used for binary variables like pass/fail, work/no work; most common in papers b/c they’re testing if tx works/no works; used for case control studies –> based on log of odds

42
Q

how to talk about controversial topics to pts?

A

provide patients with risks and benefits and guide them, present info that pt can understand, respect the patient’s choice, don’t talk down to the patient

43
Q

IRB levels of review: exempt vs expedited vs full review

A

de-ID data, anonymous surveys vs collection of biospecimens from noninvasive, identifiable data vs interventions involving physical and emotional discomfort or sensitive data

44
Q

p value = influenced by? low p value means?

A

sample size. large effect size –> result has major/clinical/practical importance

45
Q

how to double dip funding?

A

same or overlapping topic funded by diff agencies, proposing hypotheses already resolved, grant apps shared by other PIs

46
Q

odds ratio = 1 vs >1 vs <1

A

odds of case being
exposed is same as odds of control being exposed. No relationship between exposure and disease vs odds of case being exposed is greater than odds of control being exposed. Increase in disease with exposure vs odds of case being exposed is less than odds of control being
exposed. Decrease in disease with exposure

47
Q

variance and SD = greatly affected by?

A

outliers

48
Q

phase I vs II vs III vs IV of clinical trials

A

safety, drug interaxn, ADME/pharmacokinetics vs short term side effects, efficacy vs short term side effects, efficacy, new formulation, vs ongoing surveillance, new indications

49
Q

ex of conflict of interest in reseaarch

A

acting as promotional speakers on behalf of companies, accepting gifts, research involving your pts, research limiting right to publish, giving incentives to participate in research, avoiding “bias” when researching your clinical approaches

50
Q

Madsen vs Offit vs Smeeth vs Licciardone

A

retrospective cohort using Danish registry –> no assoc vs systematic review –> can’t dis/prove but can only educate parents that vax = good vs case control –> no assoc; odds ratio depended on age joining GPRD before or after 1st bday vs dec tx for LBP did no change for 1st 6mo then White ppl improve (significantly but not clinically relevant) LBP than Blacks