Price of Nature Flashcards
Different services provided by nature…
Supporting - Soil formation, food
Cultural - Stewardship, Aesthetic
Provisioning - Clean water, Fish
Regulating - Cool temperatures, flooding control
The issue with ecosystem services?
As we don’t have to pay for them may not be as valued
How to value services?
If they give a product, easier to give a monetary value
Without this have to imagine the cost of the humans producing a system to provide the same service
Harder with aesthetic, have to ask people how much they would pay to conserve it
Explain National capital initiative
The elements of nature that produce value (directly and indirectly) to people, such as the stock of forests, rivers, land, minerals and oceans. Includes the living aspects of nature such as fish stocks as well as the non - living aspects
UK attempt to review all systems
How to measure National capital
Ensured that it was underpinned by good quality science, considered all factors interlinked and not in isolation.
Also measured future need ie. where to put future pies
New forest Case Study
If you just placed the forest on market value, this would not be beneficial for all species and there would be a net loss, however, if placed so beneficial for all ecosystem services, would be more economically efficient, and more available to people.
Issues with this new forest case study
It values ecosystems against human benefit
Biodiversity offsetting procedure
Regulated by the EU, if new infrastructure is going to be produced then any damage to biodiversity needs to be mitigated, this limits the effects of biodiversity and ensure that net capital is maintained.
Minimises effect, could be by moving it to another location
Factors of biodiversity offsetting
Minimise the effect Reduce the size of the affected area Containment and reduced fragmentation Can include onsite restoration Needs to be ecologically equivalent Gain in biodiversity Reduces the negative effects of other pressures
Steps of biodiversity offsetting
Identification of impacts (critical Sum of losses Calculation of gains Sizing of offset actions Optimisation want to maintain species richness
Offsetting case study
85 development projects, 253 species affected, 161 protected internationally, 93 protected nationally, found that the projects:
19 had no offset
36 had partial offset
30 had species equality