Principals Flashcards
(26 cards)
Justifications for punishment
Utilitarian, retributivism, denunciation
Types of punishment
Deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, retribution.
Utilitarian approaches to punishment
general deterrence, specific deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation.
Retributive approaches to punishment
assaultive retribution, protective retribution
Consequentialist (utilitarian)
Actions are morally right if they result in desirable consequences.
Non-consequentialist (retributivist)
Actions are morally right or wrong in themselves, regardless of consequences.
Presumption of Innocence
Defendant is assumed to be innocent until they have been proven guilty.
Burden of proof
Prosecutions responsibility to prove that the defendant is guilty rather than the defendant being responsible to prove his innocence.
Standard of Proof
The level of certainty the fact finder must reach before ruling for the party with the burden of proof. In American criminal trial, the prosecutions standard of proof if “beyond a reasonable doubt”
The Winship Doctrine
The prosecution must persuade the fact finder “beyond a reasonable doubt” of “every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged.”
Reasons why “reasonable doubt” carries a heavy burden to prove?
i. reducing risk for factual error.
ii. high interests are at stake.
iii. 5th amendment (due process)
Prima facie defense
Create a reasonable doubt about some element of the crime.
Affirmative defense
Admitting guilt for the crime but claiming acquittal due to acting in a justified manner/excused.
6th Amendment
Right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation - be confronted with the witnesses against him/obtain witnesses in favor - to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Unless the defendant waives his right to a jury trial and elects to be tried by judge, his guilt or innocence will be determined by a jury of 12 individuals.
Jury nullification
The jury can nullify the law if they feel there are justifications for doing so. If the jury acquits the defendant even in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt, the judge is NOT permitted to punish the jury. This is a power but not a right.
Purpose of jury nullification
i. Send a message about a social issue larger than the case.
ii. The result dictated by law is contrary to the jury’s sense of justice, morality, fairness.
iii. Could prevent oppression by the government when the laws themselves are oppressive since it takes a long time to change laws etc.
Selective jury nullification
Could be a solution to the racial unfairness/discrimination in the justice system.
Vagueness Doctrine
A statute is void for vagueness when an average citizen cannot determine what PERSONS are regulated, what CONDUCT is prohibited, or what PUNISHMENT may be imposed.
Purpose behind void for vagueness
i. fair notice for what is punishable and not.
ii. prevent arbitrary enforcement of laws/arbitrary prosecutions.
Constitutional roots of the void for vagueness doctrine
5th amendment
14th amendment
8th Amendment
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.
Does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence - rather it forbids only extreme sentences that are grossly disproportionate to the crime.
14th Amendment
Equal protection clause
All persons born and naturalized in the U.S. - no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the U.S. - nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Purpose of 14th Amendment
Prohibit government from treating people different based on their race unless such treatment serve a “compelling state interest” and is “narrowly tailored” to serve that interest (strict scrutiny).
Rule of Lenity
Statutory construction, statutory ambiguities regarding the definition of, or punishment for, a particular crime should be resolved in the defendants favor.