Private Governance of Land Flashcards
(42 cards)
Easement v. Profit
Easement = The property right to enter and make use of another’s real property.
Profit = The right to TAKE something off someone’s land.
Granting v. reserving an easement
Burdened owner GRANTS an easement to the benefit holder.
Holder of the benefit RESERVES an easement for himself.
Appurtenant Easement v. Easement in Gross (+examples)
Appurtenant Easements
- The land holds the easement.
- Two to tango – There is a burdened (servient estate) and a benefitted parcel (dominate estate).
- - Both the benefit and the burden runs with the land.
- This is the favored construction of easements
- Example = access easement, shared driveway
Easements in Gross
- Benefit is held by a person!
- Only one parcel: the burdened parcel (servient estate)
- Only the burden transfers (since the benefit is not held by the land).
- Normal rule = benefit holder cannot transfer benefit.
- - Exception = if benefit is held commercially.
- Examples = utilities, railroads, billboards, public right of way, etc.
Affirmative v. negative easements
Affirmative = gives easement holder the right to do something
Negative = easement prevents holder from doing something with a certain piece of property
- MUST be created expressly (can NEVER imply negative easement)
Common law & Modern rules of negative easements
CL = May only be appurtenant (unless statute says otherwise)
- Only for light, air, and flow of water in a man-made channel.
Modern= Usually use covenants instead.
- Conservation easements are kind of like negative easements in gross.
When do express easements run with the land?
WIN
Writing (if not, SOF issues)
Intent (if not, license)
Notice (if not, BFP)
Express easement creation
- Draft a written deed of easement (or include reservation for grantor in a conveyance deed) – meet deed requirements LINK
- Define the scope.
- WHO holds the easement
- WHERE is there easement
- HOW easement is to be used
- - Use, restrictions, maintenance, liability, relocation, expiration, succession. - Execute, notarize, & deliver deed.
- Record deed.
What sort of legal description is required for an effective grant of an easement?
Not as strict as a deed description, so long as the easement can be located on a specific servient estate.
Can even have floating easements (Sufficiently describe the underlying servient estate, but fail to identify precisely where on that estate the easement is located).
Implied easement by estoppel
Elements:
(1) conduct foreseeably inviting reliance
- Can even include a moral obligation to keep people from relying (can’t passively let something happen and then after its complete let them know).
(2) and the reliance was reasonable, significant, and detrimental.
Essentially a license that morphs into an easement based on estoppel, because of equity. Doesn’t’ require payment – just becomes an easement.
Make sure person has clean hands.
Usually really large injustice if equity doesn’t step in.
Problems:
- No writing (backdoor to get around SOF)
- Can create confusion about scope. Where is this easement? No writing. Just basing it off of behaviors alone.
- Blurred line between license and easement and those are not the same.
Implied easement by prior (existing) use
Elements:
(1) Prior unity of ownership between the two estates (common grantor)
- No common grantor, you don’t have this kind of easement
(2) Unity of ownership was severed AFTER the use had started
(3) Apparent and continuous use indicating intent for use to continue
(4) Easement is reasonably necessary for use and enjoyment of dominant estate.
Common scenario: Grantor conveyed part of land and SHOULD have reserved an easement, but forgot (think access). It’s necessary to use that access to get to grantors lot.
Implied easement by strict necessity
Elements
(1) Prior unity of ownership between the two estate (common grantor)
Cannot get an implied easement over someone who was not in common ownership.
(2) Unity of ownership severed BEFORE the use had started
(3) Easement is strictly necessary for the use and enjoyment of the dominant estate.
Common scenario: property transferred is now landlocked, and there wasn’t already a road to it.
Difference between implied easement by prior use and by strict necessity:
Was there already use going on at time of severance?
- Yes = cool, use prior use (only have to show reasonable necessity**).
- No = now have to show strict necessity.
Reasonably v. strictly necessary
Strictly necessary = no other way to do it. Can’t have a road on the other side that you COULD use, just less convenient (Boyd v. BellSouth)
Use outside the scope of the easement
Use outside the scope = misuse.
- The definition of scope is much more flexible in implied bc it’s not written down.
Cannot change the who, where, or how (these are per se misuse)
- “who” is parcel or person depending on type of easement.
but you can reasonably increase the how much
- Look at the amount of change, the intent of the easement, and whether it is unduly burdensome on the servient parcel.
- Was the change reasonably foreseeable?
How do you know the scope of an implied easement?
Prior use = look at the use
Necessary = What is necessary? (quite elastic)
- Any way that is reasonably necessary to value and use this property is a necessary use - Palmer v. Yancey Lumber
- But shouldn’t unduly burden the servient holder
- Palmer Majority: Balance the utility of the proposed change against the burden.
Prescriptive = look at actual use
Divisibility of appurtenant easements
The burden that the division places on the servient owner must not exceed the burden that the parties contemplated in the original grant
Divisibility of easements in gross
Usually not allowed UNLESS all parties have to act as a unified whole (and any one party can veto resource extraction) – cannot divide in a way that encourages over use. – “Tragedy of the commons”
- Tragedy of the Commons Can quickly lead to unsustainable practices.
Divisibility of easements in gross:
Who gets the value of the additional uses of the same easement area? (expanding to fiber optics, railroads to trials)
If owner can still use property, then it’s probably the owner.
If easement holder can exclude owner, then maybe the easement holder (railroads).
Can servient holder unilaterially relocate the easement?
Traditional rule = Never (only with consent)
Restatement 3rd proposed rule: Servient holder may relocate the easement if the relocation doesnt:
1 Lessen the utility of the easement
2 Increase the burdens on the owner of the easement
3 Frustrate the pruupsoe of the easement
Top 10 easement terminators
(1) By the terms of the original grant
(2) By deed back to servient landowner
(3) By merger of the two parcels
- If the benefit and the burdened parcel comes into the same ownership, the easement is erased. You can’t burden your own land.
(4) Adverse possession of easement by servient landowner
- Exclusive, actual, hostile, open, continuous for statutory period.
- Non-use is not AP
(5) Abandonment (prolonged non-use with intent to relinquish ownership)
- Requires more than mere nonuse. There must appear to have been an intentional relinquishment of the rights granted. (Hickerson v. Bender)
- The intent to abandon can be shown by conduct that is “clearly inconsistent with an intention to continue to use the property” (Hickerson v. Bender)
- Such as failure to object to obstruction of easement (Hikerson v. Bender)
(6) By estoppel
- Lead someone to believe you aren’t needing the easement and they rely (misstatment (or conduct) & reliance & injustice)
(7) By statute (marketable title acts, etc.)
(8) By conveyance of servient land to BFP (conveyance w/o notice of easement)
(9) By foreclosure of an interest held by a third party with superior rights
- Wipes out junior leins and easements
(10) By impossibility
- Change has taken place that makes it impossible to accomplish the purpose for which the servitude was created.
- Ex: Access crossing is now at the bottom of a pond
Real covenants v. Equitable servitudes
Real covenant = formal promises that become attached to the land (enforced at law)
Equitable servitude = informal promises that attach. (don’t need privity***)
Will refer to them both as capitol C Covenants.
Requirements of Covenants (RC & ES)
(1) Writing (by formal deed-type unless equity implies)
(2) Intent to run
(3) Notice (RC by recordation; ES by recordation or facts on the ground)
(4) Touch & Concern the land
(5) Vertical Privity (RC only)
(6) Horizontal Privity (RC only)
Covenants: Privity Element
Vertical Privity
- Chain of title privity. Just explains the relationship between the current interest holder and the promise maker.
- Three situations where vertical privity’s absence may prevent enforcement of covenant:
1. Transfer of less than the predecessor’s full estate (tenant-subtenant); FSA to life estate, etc.
- Practice tip: LL should require assumptions so that new person is bound no matter what.
- BUT modern rule: transfer of any interest is sufficient
2. Adverse Possession
3. Third-Party Beneficiaries (covenant between two parties benefits a third party)
Horizontal Privity
- Relationship between the two parties that made the promise.
- Think “not mere neighbors” ← Buzz
3 Examples of Horizontal Privity
1. Landlord Tenant
2. Mutual interests in the same parcel of land (maybe on eholds easement on another’s land)
3. Grantor-Grantee (or buyer-seller)
IF NO PRIVITY = can still enforce at equity
Covenant: Touch and Concern element
Anything that pertains to the land (it’s value &/or it’s use)
Examples
Use restriction (& promise of exclusivity)
Promise to pay rent
Promsie to maintain/pay carrying costs
Promise of access
Promise to repair or improve premises
Option to renew
For the Burden to run:
Buden must touch and concern land AND benefit must touch and concern land
- Burden doesn’t (usually) run if the benefit doesn’t touch
For Benefit to run:
Benefit much touch and concern
Covenant: Intent to run element
Almost always have. Courts are casual about it.
If a covenant touches and concerns the land, the courts are willing to presume the intent to run in the absence of contrary evidence.