Private Nuisance Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

What is the definition of private nuisance?

A

Unlawful indirect interference with a persons use and enjoyment of their property which has been affected by the unreasonable behaviour of a neighbour.
- CLAIMANT MUST HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE LAND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SEDLEIGH DENFIELD V O’CALLAGHAN

A

Failing to deal with a problem even if it was caused by a past owner or trespasser can still be liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 2 types of private nuisance?

A
  1. Loss of amenity nuisance when caused by noise, smell or smoke
  2. Material damage nuisance when state of affairs on neighbouring and causes damages to claimants land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

LEAKEY V NATIONAL TRUST

A

Defendant can still be liable where the nuisance is due to natural causes and they’re aware of it but fails to deal with it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

‘Unlawful interference’

A
  • Doesn’t mean illegal however instead an unreasonable use of the land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an example of material damage?

A
  1. Fire
  2. Oily smuts from chimneys
  3. Hot air rising into other premises
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HUNTER V CANARY WHARF LTD

A

A complaint about a television reception is not considered as an interference or a right to light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What must be taken into consideration when balancing competing interferences of the claimant and defendant.

A

Factors of reasonableness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the factors of reasonableness?

A
  1. Locality
  2. The duration of the interference
  3. The sensitivity of the claimant
  4. Malice
  5. Social benefits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Locality in private nuisance

A
  • Residential areas
  • Industrial
  • STURGES V BRIDGMAN
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case for duration of the interference?

A

CROWN RIVER CRUISES LTD V KIMBOLTON FIREWORKS
- 20 minutes was a nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cases for sensitivity of the claimant?

A

ROBINSON V KILVERT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case for malice in private nuisance?

A

CHRISTIE V DAVEY
- Music teacher, D annoyed by noise and banged on walls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case for social benefit?

A

MILLER V JACKSON
- Adjoining recreation ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defences to private nuisance?

A
  • PRESCRIPTION
  • MOVING TO NUISANCE
  • STAT AUTHORITY