private nuisance Flashcards
yeahhhhhh (34 cards)
what is nuisance defined as
an indirect, substantial and unlawful interference with a persons use or enjoyment of land
what is the first element of the tort
C must be able to sue D (both parties must be eligible)
what is the second element of the tort
interference must be indirect
what is the third element of the tort
must interfere with the common and ordinary use of the land
what is the fourth element of the tort
interference must be substantial
what is the fifth element of the tort
interference must be unlawful
what must C have to be able to sue D
proprietary interest or legal right to the land
who can C sue
the creator of the nuisance, the person who occupies the land creating the nuisance, or the owner of the land creating the nuisance
what case shows the owner of the land can be sued
tetley v chitty
what case is used for physical damage
denfield v o’ callaghan
what case is used for non - physical damage by loud noise
christie v davey
what case is used for non - physical damage by bad smells
wheeler v saunders
what is continuing interference
when a natural hazard develops and D fails to prevent it interfering with other land
what case is used for continuing interference
leakey v national trust
what can prevent interference from affecting common and ordinary use of land
if use of land is not common and ordinary, and is instead an abnormal sensitivity
what case is used for abnormal sensitivity
network rail v morris
what case says a nice view is a ‘thing of delight’ and blocking it does not interfere with common and ordinary use of land
AG v doughty
what case says watching tv is not a common and ordinary use of land and is a recreational activity
hunter v canary wharf
what is the rule on physical damage for substantial interference
any physical damage is interference
what case creates the rules for substantial interference
halsey v esso petroleum
what is the rule on non physical damage for substantial interference
must make it physically unpleasant to be on the land
what rule is there for unlawful interference
D’s use of the land must go beyond common and ordinary
what case is used to show D going beyond common and ordinary
fearn v tate gallery
what case is used for locality to show common and ordinary use
sturges v bridgeman