Private Nuisance Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

What is private nuisance

A
  • Common law tort
  • Def = any unlawful direct interference with C’s use/quiet enjoyment of their land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What defines the parties in private nuisance

A

Claimant = person with legal interest in the land
- Owner
- Exclusive possession
- Landlord
- Tenant (name on tenancy agreement)
- Cannot be family members, lodgers or tenants not on agreement (Malone v Laskey, Hunter v Canary Wharf)

Defendant = creator or adopter of the nuisance
- Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callahan
- Owner/landlord/tenant (Tetley v Chitty)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the types of nuisance that falls under private nuisance

A
  • Smells (Wheeler v JJ Saunders)
  • Noise (Kennaway v Thompson, Tetley v Chitty)
  • Physical damage (St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks, Malone v Larkey)
  • Fumes (St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping)
  • Encroachment of trees/plants
  • Flooding (Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callahan)
  • Balls (Miller v Jackson)
  • NOT lost signal (Hunter v Canary Wharf)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the elements of private nuisance

A

1 - Nuisance
2 - Unreasonable
3 - Foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Element 1

A

Nuisance
- Caused property damage
OR
- Continued indirect nuisance interfering with C’s use/quiet enjoyment of land
- Not cover personal injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Element 2

A

Unreasonable
- Locality = type of area (Sturges v Bridgeman, St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping)
-> Belgrave square and Bermondsey
- Duration (Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks)
- Sensitivity = only nuisance if would cause damage without special sensitivity (Robinson v Kilvert, McKinnon v Walker)
- Malice (Christie v Davey, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm)
- Degree of interference
- Public utility/social benefit (Miller v Jackson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Element 3

A

Foreseeability
- Type and extent of damage must be reasonably foreseeable (Wagon Mound, Cambridge Waterworks Co v Eastern Country Leathers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Remedies

A
  • Injunction (Coventry v Lawrence)
  • Damages (Miller v Jackson)
  • Partial injunction (Kennaway v Thompson)
  • Abatement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Defences

A
  • Prescription = >20 years without complaint (Sturges v Bridgeman)
  • Statutory authority (Allan v Gulf Oil)
  • Act of God (Nicholls v Marland)
  • Ordinary use of land (not exceptional)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly