Private nuisanve Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition - common law

A

An indirect and unlawful interference with a persons use or enjoyment of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Inter fence can be physical- roots

A

Davey v Harrow corporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interference can by physical- flooding

A

Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interference can be non-physical- noise

A

Christie v Davey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Interference can be non-physical- smell

A

Wheeler v Saunders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non-physical interfenve must make is physically unpleasant to be on the land

A

Halsey v Esso petroleum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Emotional distress can be interference

A

Thompson Shwab V Costaki

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Continuing interfence- a natural hazard develops but D fails to take precautions to stop it interfering with other land

A

leaky v National trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Blocking view isn’t interfence

A

AG v doughty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Recreational activities isn’t interference

A

Hunter v Canary walf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Unlawful interference means unreasonable - this means goes beyond acceptable behaviour

A

Southwark v Mills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Malice

A

Christie v Davey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Locality- reasonable based on area

A

Sturges v Bridgman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Physical damage doesn’t make locality acceptable

A

St Helen’s Smelting co v Tipping LTD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social benefit

A

Miller v Jackson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Duration/ time

A

Halsey v Esso Petroleum

17
Q

Even temporary duration if severe enough

A

Crown river cruises v Kimbolton fireworks

18
Q

C’s sensitivuty/ fordeeeabke

A

Network rail infrastructure v Morris

19
Q

C must have legal rights in land to sue

A

Hunter vCanary Warf

20
Q

Created of nuisance/ land occupier can be sued

A

Tettley v Chitty

21
Q

Prescription

A

Sturges v Bridgman

22
Q

Planning permission

A