Privatisation, marketisation and private education Flashcards

1
Q

Privatisation definition

A

where services which were once provided by the state are transferred to the ownership of private companies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Marketisation definition

A

the process whereby services, like education or health, that were previously controlled and run by the state, have government or local council control and support reduced or removed altogether, and operate like independently managed private businesses, subject to the free market forces of supply and demand, based on competition and consumer choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Neoliberalism definition

A

an economic approach that suggests resources are more efficiently managed by private businesses, and advocates shifting public services like education and health from the public sector to the private sector - privatising them. This is accompanied by marketisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Many of the educational policies since the 1980s (eg privatisation and marketisation) have their roots in

A

neoliberalism, an approach that believes the state should play a minimal role in providing and managing these services, and that the free market (free enterprise and free trade between businesses) should decide how these services operate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Neoliberalism suggests that

A

the best way to deliver and improve public services is by making them operate as (or like) private businesses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Neoliberalism is a feature of the

A

New Right approach to education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the UK government spent around

A

£116 billion (inc student loan payments) on education in 2023, so there’s an enormous potential market for private investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ball and Youdell (2007) - 2 kinds of privatisation in education

A
  • privatisation in education (endogenous)
  • privatisation of education (exogenous)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ball and Youdell - privatisation in education - ‘endogenous’ privatisation

A
  • privatisation within the education system, where schools, colleges and universities begin to operate more like private businesses
  • involves importing ideas from the private sector, for example local management (schools running themselves mostly independently), competition between schools for students, efficiency, performance related pay for teachers, consumer (parental) choice between schools, target-setting, school league tables, inspections and per capita (per student) funding
  • these policies were first established by Conservative governments 1979-1997, continued by Labour governments 1997-2010 and sped up by the Conservative-Lib. dem coalition 2010-2015 with the expansion of the academy system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ball and Youdell (2007) - privatisation of education - ‘exogenous’ privatisation

A
  • privatisation from outside the education system - allowing private businesses to sell products to the state education system
  • Ball and Youdell (2007) suggest both UK and international companies are taking over things like:
    school services (staff training, consultancy, providing supply teachers, ICT services, school transport, meals, cleaning, pay rolls etc)
    management of schools (privately managed chains of academy schools)
    school inspections (like Tribal Inspections - OFSTED’s largest contractor in 2014, but it 2014 OFSTED stopped using private contractors)
    designing, building and operating school buildings under the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), where private businesses can finance construction and manage school buildings for about 30 years (owning them and renting them to the school)
    branding of schools (website construction, logo development, school prospectus design etc)
    forming education policy through advice, consultation and research
    running the examination system (Pearson Edexcel, the largest examination’s awarding body is run by the multinational company Pearson PLC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of privatisation - in favour

A
  • more business-like and efficient schools, with higher standards
  • more choice for parents
  • profit-motive may encourage companies to provide schools and improve ‘failing’ schools in order to attract more pupils
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation for privatisation - against

A
  • money may be drained from the education system as providers may not reinvest profits back into education
  • cherry-picking, where companies only invest in the best schools or ones that can be easily improved to maximise profit
  • private companies can go out of business, leaving children without schools
  • equality of educational opportunity could be under threat, as the desire for profit may override providing for pupils’ needs and could lead to more covert or overt selection of students so schools look better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

pressure to maintain performance and image of the school could lead to what Gillborn and Youdell (2000) call

A

educational triage, reinforcing inequalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Marketisation as a means of improving education was originally an idea of

A

new right theorists like Chubb and Moe, and was first developed in the UK under Conservative governments 1979-1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Main features of marketisation

A
  • independence (allowing schools to control their own affairs and run like private businesses)
  • competition (making schools compete for students)
  • choice (giving parents a choice of schools, enabling them to choose the education which best suits them)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Features of marketisation (independence, competition and choice) are backed up by

A

quality control (through inspections by OFSTED), a national curriculum, government-approved subjects (like the EBacc), testing, the publication of Performance Tables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

parentocracy (described by Brown, 1990) definition

A

where a child’s education is dependent upon the wealth and wishes of parents, rather than the ability and efforts of pupils
(the wealth element refers to parents who choose private education, but also how wealthier parents have more effective choices in the state-funded education system)

18
Q

Brown (1990) - marketisation and parentocracy

A

the emphasis on ‘parent power’, with parents having more rights and choice of schools than ever, has been described as a parentocracy

19
Q

Marketisation and school diversity

A

since the 1980s there has been a growing range of different types of state schools, offering parents more choice
this diversity is accompanied by encouraging ‘partners’ like private businesses, universities, colleges, community and parent groups to become more involved in running schools and raise standards using their expert knowledge or enthusiasm

20
Q

Different types of state schools - these don’t always exists in a pure form and may involve elements of a different type (eg an academy may also be a faith school and a specialist school)

A
  • specialist schools
  • grammar schools
  • community schools
  • free schools
  • foundation and trust schools
  • voluntary-aided and voluntary-controlled schools
  • faith schools
  • city technology schools
  • special schools
  • academies
21
Q

Marketisation and raising standards

A
  • marketisation was designed to raise standards
  • as consumers of education, parents can choose between competing schools
  • schools would be forced to improve standards to attract more students (and funding)
  • poorly performing schools would risk losing money, closing or being taken over by an academy
22
Q

Policies and the marketisation of education

A
  • Target setting (eg 35% of pupils getting 5 A*-C GCSEs)
  • National testing (SATs, GCSEs etc)
  • National Performance Tables (league tables) showing school results
  • Ofsted inspections, with reports on strengths and weaknesses and recommendations for improvement
    All aim to to drive up standards by encouraging competition for the best results and good positions in league tables, therefore attracting students and money, to identify the best schools, to shame the worst schools into improving and to give parents the information to choose a school
23
Q

Policies and the marketisation of education

A
  • More independence for schools and colleges (Local management of schools, run by headteachers and governments) gives schools more independence and control to respond to parents’ wishes and improve
  • Formula funding (money given per students) and pupil premium (extra money for most disadvantaged students) aims to reward high-quality schools for attracting students and encourage the best schools to attract more disadvantaged students and provide money to help improve their education
  • Business sponsorship and private financing of some state schools bring in money for successful schools and uses private business money and expertise to help schools compete in the education market
24
Q

Policies and the marketisation of education

A
  • School diversity
  • Parental choice/parentocracy
  • Open enrolment (schools have to accept students if they have vacancies)
    all aim to enable consumers to have the most choice and therefore choose the best ‘products’ and to allow the most popular schools to expand and fill all the places, further encouraging competition
25
Q

Criticisms of marketisation of education

A
  • the middle class has gained the most
  • encourages educational triage
  • difficulties in improving schools and colleges
  • ‘dumbing down’ of teaching content
  • problems with the national curriculum and testing
  • reduced quality control
  • chaos in the education system
26
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: The myth of parentocracy - the middle class has gained the most

A
  • Ball et al (1996) - parents are now encouraged to view themselves as consumers of education, however parental choice follows a pattern related to social class and contributes to the reproduction of class inequality
  • Tough and Brooks (2007) - better-educated, middle class families with higher incomes are more likely to choose schools based on performance, whereas working class parents are more likely to choose schools nearest to their homes
  • Machin and Vernoit (2010) found evidence that the 2010-15 coalition government’s new academies contained significantly less disadvantaged (FSM)
  • some schools use covert selection and try to dissuade poorer families from applying
  • middle class parents are more able to find the best schools, understand league tables, compare schools, know more about interpreting OFSTED reports, can afford to move into the catchment of better schools, afford higher transport costs and know more about appeals and application procedures
27
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: Education triage

A
  • competition between schools mean teachers try to prioritise getting the best results overall to look better in league tables
  • this can encourage educational triage
  • a report by the House of Commons Education Committee (2011) suggested that the introduction of the EBacc would lead to teachers devoting more time to pupils who had a chance of achieving this standard and a “serious risk that schools will simply ignore their less academically successful pupils”
28
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: Difficulties in improving schools and colleges

A
  • competition between schools for funding may make it harder for poorer schools to improve, as students go elsewhere
  • popular schools get more money so can improve much more and have better teachers, whereas poorer schools lose income and therefore may lack resources
  • the pupil premium funding may not be enough to encourage better schools to attract the poorer pupils
29
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: Potential ‘dumbing down’ of content

A
  • the need to retain students may mean that if students have too much work or find it too difficult, they move to another course or school
  • retaining students may make schools not push them too hard in fear of losing them and this may lead to a ‘dumbing down’ of teaching and subject content
30
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: Problems with the national curriculum and testing

A
  • national curriculum has been criticised for not giving teachers enough opportunity to respond to the needs of pupils
  • testing has been criticised (particularly the SATs at KS1, age 7) for putting too much pressure on young children
  • teaching may become overly focused on getting good results in these tests and neglect wider learning
  • as academies and free schools are exempt from the national curriculum, these criticisms no longer apply to 80% of secondary schools, however this does make it more difficult to ensure a suitable curriculum is being taught in these schools
31
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: Reduced quality control

A
  • evidence is emerging that Ofsted is not completely independent and can be manipulated by politicians
  • in 2014, during the inspection of Birmingham schools alleged to be involved with an Islamist extremist ‘plot’ to take over schools, Ofsted changed its criteria so that schools originally rated as ‘outstanding’ became ‘inadequate’ and were place in special measures
32
Q

Critique of marketisation of education: Chaos in the education system

A
  • now a lack of local oversight and checks and balances over what academies do and how they spend their money
  • parents are unclear on who these schools are accountable to (can complaints go to the headteacher, local authority etc)
  • series of scandals 2013-4 in academies ranging from financial corruption to fears of Islamist extremism
  • local authorities have lost controls over the planning and supply of school places
  • headteachers have frequently complained that the pace of educational change (esp in curriculums and exam systems) along with the need to compete with other schools and the lack of support has made the quality and planning of English schooling increasingly chaotic
33
Q

7% of the school population is

A

in private education

34
Q

Private education - independent schools

A
  • Walford (2003) points out the wide diversity of independent schools, some of which are so small they are almost like ‘home schooling’
  • Walford points out the range of religious independent schools (more than 50 muslims schools and 60 evangelical christian schools)
  • while independent schools meet parental wishes, they don’t necessarily lead to the elitism and prestige associated with some independent school
35
Q

Elite definition

A

a small group holding great power and privilege in society

36
Q

Private education - Public schools

A
  • the most expensive and prestigious private schools
  • Walford - “entry to such schools has been seen as a passport to academic success, to high-status universities and to prosperous and influential careers”
  • pupils at these schools are largely the children of the wealthiest upper and upper-middle-class parents
  • average day fees up to £20,000 a year
  • Eton charges up to £50,000 per year for boarders
37
Q

Evaluation in support of independent schools

A
  • smaller class sizes and better facilities give children better chances of getting into university
  • The Sutton Trust (2011) found that independent schools are 7x more likely to be accepted into Oxford and Cambridge, rising to 55x more likely when compared to pupils who qualify for FSM
  • At Oxford, 31% of students went to private school (7% of general population)
  • many independent schools are also selective so this helps them to maintain high standards
  • many defend private education with the view that parents should be able to spend their money as they wish
  • teachers’ salaries are often higher in the public sector, so independent schools often attract better-qualified and more experienced teachers than the state sector
38
Q

Evaluation against independent schools

A
  • many argue that most people can’t afford private education and it is wrong that children of the wealthy should have such a clear advantage
  • many independent schools use charitable status to avoid paying taxes
  • the taxpayer pays to train teachers of private schools as they attend state-run universities and colleges
  • the quality of teaching is often similar in independent schools, but the smaller classes, increased individual attention and better resources improve results
  • research suggests that even when privately educated pupils get worse exam results they still get better jobs, suggesting attending public school is enough to secure a good job regardless of qualifications
39
Q

Privately educated people make up 7% of the general population (stats from 2013)

A

but
- 68% of top barristers
- 70% of top judges
- 50% of the House of Lords
- 54% of the top media personnel
- 35% of MPs

40
Q

Out of 56 prime ministers

A

only 11 have only attended non-fee-paying schools

41
Q

Elite education and elite jobs and the ‘old boys’ network’

A
  • a social network of ex public school students providing valuable social capital
  • often those in positions of power recruit those from a similar background
  • means that well-paid future careers with power and status can be almost guaranteed with a private education
  • undermines the principle of equality of educational opportunity and the idea that Britain is a meritocracy
  • demonstrates Bowles and Gintis’ marxist idea that the education system confirms and legitimises social class of origin as social class of destination