Professional Responsibility Flashcards
(23 cards)
Duties to clients
(MR 1.1-1.18)
Duties to courts/the legal system
(MR 3.1-3.9)
Duties to third parties
(MR 4.1-4.4)
Law Firm/Practice Issues
(MR 5.1-5.7)
Public Service
(MR 6.1-6.5)
Advertising & Solicitation Rules
(MR 7.1-7.6)
Integrity of the Profession
(MR 8.1-8.5)
Misconduct (4 grounds for discipline)
MR and CR 8.4
- Violating the rules
- Criminal acts that reflect adversely on your honesty, trustworthiness, etc
- Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or reckless or intentional misrepresentation
- Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice
Liability for actions of subordinate lawyers
MR 5.1
Lawyers running firm have a duty for subordinates
Liability of subordinate lawyers
5.2
Even subordinate lawyers can be at fault for breaking rules
Liability for actions of non-lawyers
5.3
Must do best to ensure nonlawyers also follow the rules
Malpractice (elements)
- Lawyer owed a duty to the plaintiff
- Lawyer failed to exercise the competence and diligence normally exercised by lawyers in similar circumstances
- The breach of duty harmed the plaintiff
Confidentiality of Information
1.6 Lawyer may not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent except: 1. substantial bodily harm 2. prevent financial harm or mitigate it 3. legal advice to comply with rules 4. defense when sued if necessary 5. comply with law 6. detect conflicts but only if the revealed information would not compromise the attorney-client privilege or otherwise prejudice the client.
Tackling Confidentiality Questions
First ask: is there confidential client information?
Second ask: is there an exception under 1.6(a)?
Has the client given informed consent to the disclosure?
Is disclosure impliedly authorized as part of the representation?
Third ask: Is there an exception under 1.6(b)?
California Confidentiality Exception
Lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the lawyer reasonably believes is likely to result in death of, or substantial bodily harm to, an individual,
Reporting Misconduct
8.3 NO CALIFORNIA VERSION
If you know that another attorney has violated the rules in a way that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, you are required to report them.
When are you PERMITTED to disclose
confidential information?
Informed consent
Impliedly authorized
Prevent death or serious bodily harm
Prevent future crime/fraud causing substantial financial injury – committed with lawyer’s services
Mitigate past crime/fraud causing substantial financial
injury – committed with lawyer’s services
Secure legal advice about rule compliance
Defend against claims involving the lawyer
Comply with other law/court order
Detect conflicts
When are you REQUIRED to disclose confidential information?
When disclosure is “necessary to avoid assisting a criminal
or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited
by Rule 1.6” (MR 4.1; CR 4.1; MR 1.2(d); CR 1.2.1).
If you may, then you must, if necessary to avoid assisting.
NOTE: You may be able to avoid assisting by withdrawing.
You MUST withdraw:
If continuing to represent the client would require YOU, the
lawyer, to violate the rules or a law.
Rule 1.16: “[A] lawyer shall not represent a client or, where
representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the
representation of a client if . . . the representation will result in
violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law.”
Comment 2: “A lawyer ordinarily must decline or withdraw from
representation if the client demands that the lawyer engage in
conduct that is illegal or violates the Rules of Professional
Conduct or other law.”
You MAY withdraw:
If the client is using or has used your services to commit a crime or fraud
Rule 1.16(b)
NOTE: Just because the client has used your services doesn’t
mean you have knowingly assisted in violation of MR 1.2(d).
Relationship to Rule 4.1: 4.1 might require you to disclose, even
if you’re not required to withdraw.
Restatement: “[T]he attorney-client privilege may be invoked . . . with respect to:
(1) a communication
(2) made between privileged persons
(3) in confidence
(4) for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal
assistance for the client.”
Restatement, sec. 69: “Communication”
“A communication is any expression through which a
privileged person . . . undertakes to convey information
to another privileged person and any document or other
record revealing such an expression.”
BUT: The privilege does not protect the underlying facts
conveyed, only the communication itself.
Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration
of Justice
8.4(d)
EXAMPLES:
A lawyer tipping off the subject of a law enforcement raid
A lawyer failing to pay a judgment to a client who sued him
A law school dean who submitted inflated LSAT scores and GPA’s to US News
A lawyer sexually harassing legal secretary applicants
President Clinton giving evasive answers in a deposition