Prognosis, Re-eval, and Maintenance Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

A prediction of the course, duration and
outcome of a disease based on a general
knowledge of the risk factors for the disease
‣ It is established after the diagnosis is made and
before the treatment plan is established.

A

Prognosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

an evaluation of the course of the

disease without treatment.

A

Diagnostic Prognosis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

an evaluation of the course of

the disease with treatment.

A

Therapeutic Prognosis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

T/F: The GOAL is to Deliver a predictable and long term stable comprehensive tx plan

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

_______: the anticipated result of the

periodontal therapy with anticipated prosthetic treatment

A

Prosthetic Prognosis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In the studies, what combination of tx and maintenance showed the least number of teeth lost per year?

A

Tx and regular maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth can be stabilized with comprehensive periodontal
treatment and periodontal maintenance. Future loss of the periodontal supporting tissues is
unlikely if these conditions are met

A

Favorable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth is influenced by local and/or systemic factors
that may or may not be able to be controlled. The periodontium can be stabilized with
comprehensive periodontal treatment and periodontal maintenance if these factors are
controlled; otherwise, future periodontal breakdown may occur

A

Questionable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)
: The periodontal status of the tooth is influenced by local and/or systemic factors that
cannot be controlled. Periodontal breakdown is likely to occur even with comprehensive
periodontal treatment and maintenance

A

Unfavorable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(KWOK AND CATON (2007) Prognosis)

: The tooth must be extracted

A

Hopeless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

One or more of the following:  
‣ Etiologic factors can be controlled  
‣ Adequate periodontal support  
‣ Tooth or teeth can be adequately maintained by the professional 
and patient  
‣  Controlled systemic factors
A

GOOD:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))
: One or more of the following:
• Up to 25% attachment loss measured clinically and radiographically
• Grade I furcation allows access for maintenance
• Tooth or teeth can be maintained with proper professional and
home care
• Limited systemic factors

A

FAIR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

\: One or more of the following:  
• Up to 50% loss has occurred      
• Grade II furcation with difficult access to the depth and position of the furcation  
• Greater than Miller class 1 mobility  
• Poor crown-to- root ratio  
• Lack of patient compliance  
• Presence of systemic factors
A

POOR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

One or more of the following:
• Greater than 50% attachment loss
• Grade II or III furcation involvement not accessible for maintenance
• Endodontically involved tooth that must be resolved before
periodontal treatment
• Tooth or teeth not easily maintained by professional and/ or patient

A

QUESTIONABLE:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(PROGNOSIS (MCGUIRE ’96))

‣ One or more of the following:
‣ Inadequate attachment to support the tooth
‣ Grade III furcation involvement
‣ Miller class III mobility
‣ Tooth or teeth cannot be maintained by the professional and/ or the patient

A

HOPELESS:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the most important determinant of prognosis for individual teeth/

A

Amount of attachment loss

17
Q
when present extend into 
furcation areas of ~20-30% of 
mandibular and maxillary molars. 
This clinical photo illustrates the 
most common location of CEPs 
(buccal surface of second 
maxillary molar)
A

CERVICAL-ENAMEL PROJECTIONS

18
Q

What teeth commonly hace CEPs?

A

Max 2nd molars

19
Q

Where do enamel pearls typically occur?

A

Max 2nd and 3rd molars

20
Q

The palatogingival groove is found on what teeth typically?

21
Q

Amount of bone loss is about 3.6 times higher

than normal in teeth that have more or less root proximity?

A

Teeth having roots closer together have more rapid bone loss

22
Q

Are max or mand molars most often loss to perio disease?

23
Q

73% OF MANDIBULAR MOLARS
cementum extending from the mesial to the distal of a furcation opening
-Hinders professional cleaning
-More rapid bone loss

A

Furcation ridge

24
Q

DOES A SUCCESSFUL ENDODONTIC TX EFFECT PERIO PROGNOSIS?

25
Re-evaluation of periodontal case should occur about __ weeks after completion of SRP. ‣ Allows time for healing of epithelium and CT ‣ Allows patient sufficient time to practice and improve OH ‣ Gingival inflammation is usually reduced or eliminated within 3-4 weeks after removal of calculus and local irritants
4-6 weeks
26
Healing after STP: Formation of __________ ‣ this attachment epithelium appears 1-2 weeks after therapy ‣ Gradual reductions in inflammatory cell population, crevicular fluid flow, and repair of connective tissue will result in less inflammation, redness and swelling
LONG JUNCTIONAL EPITHELIUM
27
Does healing after SRP tx involve hypersensitivity?
Yes for a few weeks; should go away
28
Ideally: No pockets =/> ___ mm and none >___ mm with BOP
> or =5; none >4 mm with BOP
29
if the pt has a loss of attachment of __ mm or greater at re- evaluation, should be referred
5 mm or more
30
Treatment of advanced perio disease by a periodontist | usually successful if ___ to ____ mm pockets
5mm to 8 mm
31
Does a pt need to have a good plaque score to be referred to a periodontist?
Yes ideally less than 20%
32
includes all the procedures performed at selected intervals to assist the periodontal patient in maintaining oral health. • These usually consist of examination, an evaluation of oral hygiene and nutrition, scaling, root curettage, and polishing of teeth.
SPT or perio maintenance
33
In a study where SPT wasn't performed, what happened to attachment loss over 2 years without maintenance?
1.2-1.9mm of attachment loss
34
How often should SPT be delivered to a high risk patient?
Every 3 months
35
(how often should pt be seen) Patients displaying a low- risk profile for periodontitis recurrence yield all risk factors in the low-risk category or, at most, one risk factor in the moderate risk category.
Once a year for SPT
36
(How often should pt be seen) Patients presenting with at least two risk factors in the moderate-risk category and at most one risk factor in the high-risk category were classified as displaying a moderate-risk profile.
Twice a year
37
(How often should pt be seen?) Patients showing at least two risk factors in the high- risk category are defined to belong to a high-risk profile for disease recurrence.
Every 3-4 months
38
Maintenance is usually every __ months initially - WHY? —-> Clinical Studies show it is the right regiment to keep the clinical parameters stable.
3