Project Management 5.0 Flashcards
(106 cards)
When should an Architect use full disclosure?
When the Architect is compensated or has an economic interest in the issue. (The Architect should never accept compensation from more than one party, which is a conflict of interest, and the Architect should render decisions impartially when acting as the judge of contract performance. There is no requirement for fully disclosing why you give up a commission, but the Architect does need to fully disclose if they have a personal economic interest in a situation.)
What are phases in a typical work plan
-Plan -Do -Check -Adjust
A CPM schedule is developed, but after four weeks the contractor encounters major unforeseen conditions. The CPM was supposed to be 400 days, and the float time is 50 days. The unforeseen conditions will cause a 20-day delay in the critical activities path. Will the project be late, and if so, by how many days?
Yes, there will be a 20-day delay. (The float time for a CPM schedule is the number of days that a project can “lose” for non-critical activities. The question states that 20 days will be lost to critical activities; therefore, the project will be delayed by 20 days.)
An architect has been asked to recommend a schedule for an upcoming project. The complex project will have a series of interdependent activities and a need to overlay the architect’s scope of services and the timing of contract administration duties into the schedule. Which schedule is the architect most likely to recommend?
Critical Path Method (CPM) is the most likely choice in this scenario. CPM schedules are regularly used for large, complex projects and often incorporate the architect’s scope of services and timing of contract administration duties.
What is included in an Architect’s minimum construction contract administration services?
- Reporting to the building officials - Reporting to the owner - Shop drawing review - Periodic site visits ( The architect must report to the owner and building official whenever code violations od deviations from the contract documents are observed.)
An architect serving as a project manager for a large project has implemented a schedule in order to keep all parties on track. The architect has received feedback that deadlines have been missed and important information is not appearing in the schedule. What is most likely the reason for the issue?
The architect implemented a milestone chart. ( A milestone chart is a great choice for small projects, but it does not provide enough detail to manage a large project.)
Prime Agreement
Pre-existing owner/ Architect Agreement
Contracts
A201-2017
General Conditions of the Contract for Construction
Contracts
C401-2017
Standard Form of Agreement Between the Architect and the Consultant
Why the initial information in owner/architect agreements should not be skipped?
It is a critical part and the very foundation of the owner/architect agreement. For architects, it can be a tool to teach owners about the design and construction process. For owners, it can be a useful checklist of information they need to provide, and decisions they need to make, that will impact the project.
Contracts
B101-2017, Article 1
Helps to establish the parties’ expectations on the project, and provides a convenient checklist of items the parties should agree upon before executing the agreement.
What prompts are included for the parties to insert on the B101-2017?
On the B101-2017 the Standard Form of Agreement Between the Owner and Architect, the following includes prompts for the parties to insert: - Information about the owner’s program - The project’s physical characteristics - Representatives of the parties - The owner’s budget - The intended delivery method for the project - Milestone dates for the project - The owner’s sustainable objectives - Consultants to be retained by each party
What prompts are included for the parties to insert on the B101-2017?
On the B101-2017 the Standard Form of Agreement Between the Owner and Architect, the following prompts are included for the parties to insert: - Information about the owner’s program - The project’s physical characteristics - Representatives of the parties - The owner’s budget - The intended delivery method for the project - Milestone dates for the project - The owner’s sustainable objectives -Consultants to be retained by each party
What is the architect’s obligation to design to budget?
The first place to look at is the contract. AIA Contract Documents address this issue in two ways: - AIA Document B101-2017 Standard Form of Agreement Between the Owner/ Architect -AIA Document B103-2017 Standard Form of Agreement Between the Owner/ Architect for a Complex Project
Under the terms of B101, the architect is the person best suited to keep the design within the owner’s budget. Why is that the case?
- The architect is responsible for managing the design to meet the budget - The owner has the right to rely upon the architect’s conceptual cost estimating - The architect has considerable freedom in the design process to manage the design to achieve the owner’s budgetary goals ( The key section in the contract regarding this process is Section 6.3)
Contracts
B103-2017
Standard Form of Agreement Between the Owner and Architect for a Complex Project
How does B103 approach the budget?
In B103, the architect has the right to rely upon the estimate provided by the owner’s cost estimator, and the architect will be paid additional compensation to make changes, due to inaccuracies or incompleteness in those estimates or market conditions the architect could not reasonably anticipate.
Designing to Budget
Is a process of managing the project cost to stay within the client’s budget
On B101 the “ designing to budget” process anticipates…
… that the architect will consult with the owner regarding program, budget, and schedule; - Provide conceptual estimates of construction cost - Design with the intent to stay within budget - Update the estimates as the design progresses and inform the owner of variances from the budget - Obtain the owner’s approval of the design at each phase before moving on to the next one.
At the conclusion of the construction documents phase, if the lowest qualified bid is over the owner’s budget the owner may—among other possible remedies—require the architect, at …
… no additional charge, to perform redesign services to bring the cost within the budget. (B101-2017 Section 6.7) But if price increases due to market conditions the architect could not reasonably anticipate, then the architect will be paid to make changes to meet the budget as an additional service.
Spearin Doctrine
The gap between the Standard of Care and defect-free documents. Costs associated with the Spearin Doctrine are borne by the owner, as the architect developed them in accordance with the standard of care and not as a result of negligence.
Scope Creep
Occurs when a project’s original scope is stretched or expanded by ambiguities, events, or conduct.
Why should an architecture firm have a quality control program?
-To ensure the client’s expectations are met -To ensure the standard of care for professional practice is provided - To reduce liability and risk
Contingencies
Are intended to cover unforeseen events and should be included in fee planning.