Property Flashcards
(108 cards)
Grantor conveys land “to A and her heirs.” What kind of interest in land has been created?
A fee simple absolute - meaning it is lasts indefinitely, is freely inheritable, and transferable during life. (note that even though it mentions A’s heirs, A can transfer the land and give her heirs NADA)
What is a defeasible fee simple?
A fee simple that may terminate upon a certain event occurring - ALL defeasible fee simples contain a future interest either for a third party or the grantor.
What are the three types of defeasible fee simple estates?
(1) a fee simple determinable (automatic termination if property is used in predetermined way barred by grantor); (2) fee simple subject to a condition subsequent (termination requires re-entry by grantor); (3) fee simple subject to an executory interest (potential future interest goes to a third party, not the grantor).
Grantor gives land “to A so long as the property is used only as a school.” What interest in land has been created?
A fee simple determinable. If A uses the land for a reason other than a school, the property automatically reverts back to the grantor.
Grantor gives land “to A so long as the property is used only as a school.” What is the name of the interest retained by the grantor?
The grantor retains a right of reverter (if property used for another purpose, automatically reverts back to grantor).
Grantor gives land “to A, but if the property is used to sell liquor, then I may retake the premises.” What interest in land has been created?
A fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. The forfeiture is not automatic here - the grantor has to reenter and retake the land.
Grantor gives land “to A, but if the property is used to sell liquor, then I may retake the premises.” What is the name of the interest retained by the grantor?
A right of re-entry is retained by the grantor if the condition occurs. This right of re-entry can be waived if not exercised in a reasonable time, and though the re-entry right can usually be transferred at death, grantor cannot give another person his/her right of re-entry during grantor’s life.
Grantor gives land “to A as long as he farms the homestead, and if not, then to B.” What kind of interest in land has been created?
A fee simple subject to an executory interest. If the triggering event occurs, a third party retains the executory interest.
Grantor gives land “to A, but if A sells liquor on the property, then to B.” What kind of future interest exists and for whom?
B has a shifting executory interest in the land - if A sells liquor on the property then it automatically shifts to B.
Grantor gives land “to A, but if A sells liquor on the property, then one day later to B.” What kind of future interest exists and for whom?
B has a springing executory interest in the lane - if A sells liquor on the property then the land reverts to the grantor and later has to go to B.
The grantor gives land “to A for life.” What kind of interest in land has been created AND what future interest has been created?
This is a life estate for A’s life. Since there is no provision saying what happens when A dies, there is a reversion interest - land will go back to the grantor. This reversion is transferable by the grantor (inter vivos or upon grantor’s death).
Grantor gives land “to A for life, then to B.” What future interest has been created?
B has a vested remainder in the estate: the land will automatically vest to B at the end of A’s life (this is a certain land interest for B and so B can transfer this interest).
Grantor gives land “to A for life, then to the children of B.” What future interest has been created?
This is a vested remainder subject to open (divestment) - the class of people (children of B) could just be one child, but it could “open” if B has additional children.
Grantor gives land “to A for life, remainder to B if B married before A’s death.” What future interest has been created?
This is a contingent remainder: B has to satisfy a condition before his interest will vest. B’s contingent remainder is not transferrable.
Grantor gives land “To A for life, then to such of B’s children who are alive at B’s death.” What future interest has been created?
This is a contingent remainder: the grantee(s) of the remainder are not ascertainable at the time of the grant.
Torel Tenant writes a letter to Landlord telling her that he is unhappy in his lease and wants to get out of it. The landlord writes back and says that she will treat the lease as terminated. A few days later, Torel receives a bill in the mail for the rent due for the remainder of the lease term. Which of the following is correct?
a) T need not pay rent because the landlord’s letter constituted acceptance of T’s surrender
b) Torel must still pay rent because landlord did not expressly waive this obligation in her acceptance letter
c) Torel must still pay rent because landlord’s letter was not an acceptable acceptance of T’s surrender
d) T must still pay rent because a surrender does not terminate a tenant’s duty to pay rent
a) A tenant is relieved of his duty to pay rent if landlord accept’s T’s offer of surrender - the letters constituted effective termination and acceptance of surrender.
Which of the following does not constitute a negative easement?
a) Landowner may not construct any building higher than one story on her property
b) Landowner may not operate a business on her property
c) Landowner may not build a 12-foot fence around her property
d) Landowner may not remove the retaining wall that surrounds her property
b) a negative easement restricts the servient tenement from building structures that restrict access to air, light, or support. This is none of those.
Mortimer built a garage and driveway on his small lot. The driveway was against the boundary of the neighboring lot owned by Gertrude. Each time Mortimer drove around the corner of his driveway, his gar protruded into Gertrude’s lot by 5 inches. Which of the following is a correct statement?
a) Mortimer likely has an easement by implication
b) Mortimer likely has an easement by necessity
c) Mortimer does not need an easement because of estoppel.
d) none of the above
d) None of these are correct (remember, easement by implication requires the same landowner previously owned both lots!)
What is the difference between a tenancy at will and a tenancy at sufferance?
A tenancy at sufferance is a “hold-over” tenant - still bound by the terms of a lease that is no more but who still hasn’t been kicked off. A tenancy at will is created by agreement.
In states that recognize tenancy by the entirety:
a) Neither spouse can convey his/her interest without the other’s consent
b) The right of survivorship cannot be broken during the marriage
c) Either spouse may sever the tenancy
d) The tenancy may be severed by either spouse’s creditors
a) - this sort of tenancy can only be extinguished by mutual agreement. Only mutual creditors could sever it.
WTF is the rule in Shelley’s Case?
It’s an antiquated rule (pretty much no one follows it) that says a life estate with the remainder to that life estate holder’s heirs (e.g. “To A for life, then to A’s heirs” is essentially a fee simple absolute. However, since most folks don’t follow it, under that conveyance, A’s heirs really would have a recognizable future interest!
George and Georgia gave their farm to the City of Pleasantville with a warranty deed. The deed said “George and Georgia hereby grant our farm to the city of Pleasantville for the purpose of constructing a park thereon.” The city didn’t need another park and so sold it to Dorothy Developer who proceeded to build a strip mall on the property. Which of the following is true?
a) Upon selling the property to Dorothy, the property reverted to George and Georgia
b) The gift to the city created a fee simple determinable and an automatic possibility of reverter to George and Georgia
c) Dorothy took the farm as a fee simple absolute
d) The gift to the city created a fee simple determinable and a right of re-entry for Georga and Georgia
c) - G & G’s wish that the farmland be used for a park is not an actual condition subsequent. They didn’t use the magic words, “but only if used to construct a park” and so this gave the city an absolute right to sell in fee simple absolute to Dorothy.
Owen owned Greenacres in fee simple. He conveyed it to Alma, but if Baker is living 30 years from the date of this deed, then to Baker. The limitation to Baker is:
a) invalid
b) Valid, because B’s interest is a reversion
c) Valid, because B’s interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being
d) Valid, because B’s interest is vested subject to divestment
C - Baker is a life in being at the time of conveyance. He has a potential shifting executive interest subject to the RAP. The interest will vest or fail during his lifetime and thus doesn’t violate the RAP.
Alison owned camp D in fee simple. By her will she devised “Camp D to my grandchildren who reach the age of 21, this includes all after-born grandchildren.” At the time of her death, Alison had 4 kids and 3 grandkids. This devise is valid against the RAP because:
a) There is a presumption that Alison intended to only include those grandchildren born before her death
b) All of Alison’s children are measuring lives
c) Alison had 3 grandchildren at the time of her death and they must turn 21 within 21 years of her death
d) Alison could have had more children after the conveyance was made
b) Alison’s kids are measuring lives and she can’t have more at the time of conveyance because she dead. The gift must vest within 21 years of the deaths of Alison’s children and because their kids can turn 21 after no more than 21 years of their deaths, it is valid.