Property offences Flashcards
(39 cards)
what act and section is burlary under ?
S9 of the theft act 1968
explain S9.1.a
when D enters a building as a tresspasser with intention to steal, inflict GBH or cause damage
explain S9.1.b
Once entered the building, D then decides to steal, inflict BH or attempt to steal or inflict GBH
What are the 4 areas to burglary ?
- Entry
- Building
- Tresspasser
- Mens Rea x2
explain entry
burglary
to enter a building
‘any insetion of D’s body’
Ryan (1996)
head, arm, window
- D had his head and right arm stuck in a window
- Guilty of S9.1.a
entry
explain Building
burglary
- a building is fairy perminent and conciderable size
- part - an area of a building where you can’t go
- vehicle/wheels - must be designed for habitation
Stevens and Gourlay (1859)
shed, shop
burglary
- d broke into a shed being used as a shop
- judge created the test ‘conciderable size and perminent’
- guilty of S9.1.b
building
Walkington (1979)
debhanams, till, money
- D entered debhanams and went behind the till and stole the money
- guilty of S9.1.a
explain trespasser
burglary
- D must enter the buildingas a trespasser
- three types
1. No permission
2. outside area of permission
3. exceed permission
Collins (1972)
socks, sex, boyfriend
- D was invited into V’s room to have sex as she thought it was her boyfriend. after she realised it wasn’t him and kicked D out
- not guilty
trespasser
explain mens rea for burglary
- D must intend to enter as a trespasser or to be reckless
- D must intend the final offence
what is the definition for robbery
D steals and immediatley before, at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, uses force on any person or seeks to put any person in fear of being subjected to force
What are the 5 areas of robbery ?
- theft
- force
- timing
- purpose
- mens rea
explain theft in context of robbery
all 5 elements of theft need to be established
(appropriation, propery, PBA, dishonesty, ITPD)
Corcoron V Anderton
eldery, bag, 2 boys
- an elderly woman restled with her handbag against 2 boys
- guilty
explain force
robbery
- the defendant needs to have either threatend force or used force
1. the force must modify v’s movement
2. force threat can be against any person
3. force can apply to a person/property
Dawson and James
nudged, pickpocket
- D’s nudged and jostled V in order to pickpocket him
- guilty of robbery as they used foce that modified the V’s movement
explain timing
robbery
- the force must be applied immediatly before or at the time of the theft
- the theft is classed as continuing whilst D is still in the building
Hale
house, continue, tie
D stole from womens house and used force after (tied her up) still robbery as the force is still continuous as they were still in the building
explain purpose
robbery
the purpose of the force/threatend force has to be to steal
Donaghy
taxi, london, after
- D made threats to a taxi driver to take him to london. when there he stole money from him
- not guilty of robbery as the threat of force was not to steal, stealing was an afterthought
explain the two elements of mens rea in robbery
D must have the:
1. intention to steal
2. intention for the force/threat
what act is theft under
S1 of the theft act 1986