Property Offences

Question 1

What case did the case R v Vinall set out?
(🥊🚲)

Answer 1

Legal principle: the defendant must ‘assume’ at least one right of ownership.

Question 2

What legal principle did the case R v Pitham & Hehl set out?
(🛋️🪑💵)

Answer 2

Legal principle: appropriation can be assuming the right to sell the property, even if it it’s never removed.

Question 3

What legal principle did the case R v Morris set out?
(🏷️🔀)

Answer 3

Legal principle: it does not have to be ALL rights of ownership that are assumed.

Question 4

What legal principle did the case Lawrence v Commissioner for Metropolitan Police set out?
(👌🚕)

Answer 4

Legal principle: Appropriation can happen, even with the owners consent.

Question 5

What legal principle did the case R v Gomez set out?
(🧾🛍️)

Answer 5

legal principle: Gomez suggest that the appropriation must take place at a specific time.

Question 6

What legal principle did the case R v Hinks set out?
(👩‍⚕️🤑)

Answer 6

Legal principle: appropriation can still happen if it’s a valid gift.

Question 7

What legal principle did the case R v Atakpu and Abrahams set out?
(🛂🎫)

Answer 7

Legal principle: the appropriation happens the first time a right of ownership is assumed.

Question 8

What legal principle did the case R v Kelly and Lindsay set out?
(👩‍🎨💪🦵🦶)

Answer 8

Legal principle: body parts still class as property

Question 9

What legal principle did the case Oxford v Moss set out?
(📄❌)

Answer 9

Legal principle: confidential information cannot be stolen.

Question 10

What legal principle did the case R v Turner set out?
(🚗🔑)

Answer 10

Legal principle: the person in control may not be the owner.

Question 11

What legal principle did the case R v Woodman set out?
👨‍🏭

Answer 11

Legal principle: it’s possible to be in control of property you don’t know exists.

Question 12

What legal principle did the case