Property Offenses Flashcards

1
Q

What are the property offenses (9)?

A
  1. Larceny
  2. Embezzlement
  3. False Pretenses
  4. Robbery
  5. Extortion
  6. Receipt of Stolen Property
  7. Theft
  8. Forgery
  9. Malicious Mischief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the elements of “larceny” (4) ?

A
  1. a TAKING (obtaining control) and CARRYING AWAY (asportation)
  2. of TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF another with POSSESSION
  3. by TRESPASS (without consent or by consent induced by fraud)
  4. with INTENT TO PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE that person of her interest in the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

With regards to “larceny” what is the rule re possession?

A

The property stolen must be taken from the custody or possession of another.

If D had possession of property at the time of the taking, the crime is NOT larceny, but may be embezzlement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

With regards to “larceny” what is the issue re: “possession” versus “custody”?

A
  • “possession” involves greater scope of authority than custody. Person has discretionary authority of property

NOTE –> low level employees normally only have custody of an item. So they can be guilty of larceny for taking item.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

With regards to “larceny” what is the special rule re: bailee and breaking bulk?

A

Normally –> bailee has possession and may be guilty of embezzlement (not larceny)

HOWEVER –> if she opens closed containers in which property has been placed, she is breaking bulk, and she may be guilty of larceny bc possession is regarded to go back to bailor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the rule with regards to “larceny” and “intent to permanently deprive”?

A

In General –> larceny requires that AT THE TIME OF THE TAKING, D INTENDED to permanently deprive that person of the property

Sufficient intent –> intent to create substantial risk of loss, or intent to sell or pledge the goods

Insufficient Intent –> D:

  1. believes property is hers; OR
  2. she intends only to borrow the property; OR
  3. to keep it as repayment of a debt

MBE tip –> make sure D had intent to permanently desire WHEN she took the property. If NOT, there is no larceny (unless it’s a continuing trespass situation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the rule re: larceny and mislaid property?

A

Larceny CAN be committed with –> lost or mislaid property, or property that has been delivered by mistake

BUT NOT –> with ABANDONED property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the rule re: larceny and “continuing trespass” situation?

A

If D WRONGFULLY takes property WITHOUT intent to permanently deprive (ie… without permission borrows umbrella) and LATER decides to keep the property, she is guilty of larceny WHEN she decides to keep it.

HOWEVER –> if the original taking was NOT WRONGFUL, and she later decides to keep it, it is NOT LARCENY.
EXAMPLE –> she took the umbrella thinking it was hers, then decides to keep it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the elements of “embezzlement” (3)?

A
  1. conversion (dealing w property in manner inconsistent w arrangement) of personal property of another
  2. by a person in LAWFUL POSSESSION of that property
  3. with INTENT to defraud
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do you distinguish “larceny” from “embezzlement”?

A

Larceny –> D misappropriates item while it is not in his possession

Embezzlement –> D misappropriates item while it IS in his lawful possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the rule with regards to “embezzlement” and “fraudulent intent”?

A

D must have INTENT to DEFRAUD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

With regards to “embezzlement” and “fraudulent intent” - what is the rule if D has the intent to restore the property?

A
  • If D has intent to restore EXACT property taken –> not embezzelement

If D has intent to restore SIMILAR or SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR property –> it IS embezzlement
-NOTE –> this includes money of identical value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

With regards to “embezzlement” and “fraudulent intent” - what is the rule if D has a claim of right?

A

There is NO embezzlement if D took property under a claim of right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the elements of “false pretenses” (3) ?

A
  1. obtaining TITLE to PERSONAL PROPERTY of another
  2. by an INTENTIONAL false statement of PAST or EXISTING fact
  3. with INTENT to DEFRAUD

NOTE:

  1. the victim must ACTUALLY be deceived or act in reliance on the misrepresentation; AND
  2. it must be a MAJOR FACTOR in them giving up title
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the difference between “false pretenses” and “larceny by trick”?

A

“larceny by trick” –> victim is tricked by misrepresentation of fact into giving up mere CUSTODY of the item

“false pretenses” –> victim is tricked into giving up TITLE of the item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the elements of “robbery” (4)?

A
  1. a TAKING of PERSONAL PROPERTY of another
  2. FROM the other’s PERSON or PRESENCE (including anywhere in his vicinity)
  3. by FORCE OR THREAT OF IMMEDIATE DEATH OR PHYSICAL INJURY, to the victim, a member of his family, or anyone in his vicinity;
  4. with INTENT to permanently deprive him of it
17
Q

With regards to robbery, what is the MBE tip?

A

For D to be guilty of robbery, victim must give up property bc she feels threatened. If she gives it up for some other reason (for example, she feels sorry), there is no robbery.

NOTE –> there still may be attempted robbery

18
Q

How do you distinguish robbery from larceny?

A

Robbery requires D use FORCE or THREATS to take V’s property.

THUS –>
- pickpocketing will usually be larceny UNLESS the victim notices attempt and resists

19
Q

What is common law extortion?

A

At common law –> corrupt collection of unlawful fee by an officer under color of office.

MODERN –> usually, obtaining property by MEANS OF THREATS to do harm or expose information

In some states –> you don’t need to actually get the property.

20
Q

What are the elements of “receipt of stolen property”? (3)

A
  1. RECEIVING possession and control of STOLEN personal property;
  2. KNOWN to have been obtained by crime by another person;
  3. with INTENT to permanently deprive owner of his interest in it.
21
Q

With regards to “receipt of stolen property” - what satisfies the requirement of possession?

A

Manual possession is not necessary

D possesses the property:

  1. when it is put in a LOCATION DESIGNATED by her; OR
  2. She ARRANGES A SALE to 3rd party
22
Q

With regards to “receipt of stolen property” - what satisfies the requirement of “stolen personal property”?

A
  • property must be stolen AT THE TIME D receives it.

EXAM TIP –> check this carefully
EXAMPLE –> if police have already recovered the property prior to D’s receipt, D can’t be guilty of receipt of stolen property, only attempt

23
Q

What is the rule re: THEFT?

A

under many statutes and MPC, the above crimes are combined and called theft.

24
Q

What are the elements of “forgery” (3)?

A
  1. MAKING or ALTERING a WRITING with apparent legal significance
  2. so that it is FALSE
  3. with INTENT to defraud

NOTE –> no one needs to actually be defrauded

25
Q

With regards to “forgery” what happens if D fraudulently causes 3rd person to sign document?

A

If 3rd party doesn’t realize he is signing –> forgery is committed

If 3rd party does realize he is signing –> no forgery, even if induced by fraud

26
Q

What is “uttering a forged instrument”? (2)

A
  1. offering as GENUINE an INSTRUMENT that may be subject of forgery and is false;
  2. with INTENT to defraud
27
Q

What is “Malicious Mischief” (2)?

A
  1. malicious
  2. DESTRUCTION of or DAMAGE to PROPERTY of another

NOTE –> malice doesn’t require ILL will or hatred
MALICE DOES –> require that damage/destruction was intended/contemplated by D