PSY2002 SEMESTER 1 - WEEK 9 Flashcards

1
Q

summarise cognition regarding basis of behaviour, type of goal, systems, abilities

A

basis of intelligent behaviour, overriding reflexive/habitual response to favour complex, long-term goal, control sensory, memory, motor system
core vs higher order cog abilities, effort/attention required with no autopilot, top-down mental process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

name core cog abilities

A

IC, WM, CF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

name some higher order cognitive abilities

A

object permanence, self recognition, tool use/causal reasoning, ToM, mental time travel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

summarise Scala Naturae/ladder of being

A

instinct think certain animal more intelligent than others in hierarchical ‘degree of perfection’ related to how close they’re related to us (gorilla most intelligent, then reptiles, then fish)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

summarise Bloch (2019) fish sample delay for scala naturae

A

got them to learn a pattern to get rewards and believed this showed fish have WM, found frogs can do learned inhibition (can inhibit instinctual response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is found in lizards, and birds

A

lizard= IC
crows, ravens= WM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why are human seen as dominant?

A

cortex, PFC larger than other mammal, associated with core cognition, EF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is cortex

A

laminated (layered) multiple layers with different neurons doing different role, allowing complex higher order cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

compare birds to humans regarding cortex

A

no neocortex/laminated cortex but can do similar tasks to humans
= debate about why cortex is viewed as special

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

summarise WM

A

short-term representation of items held in consciousness and can be manipulated. key neural structure is in PFC
not passive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what can action potentials (spike trains) measure, tell us

A

can measure electrical activity of extracellular space around neuron and amount of firing to tell us how much processing taking place in neurons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

summarise monkey delay activity (Niki, 1974) finding a neural correlate between neuronal activity and WM- method

A

delayed response task; 2 lights, 2 buttons. 1/2 cue lights illuminated for 1s on left/right
cue illumination off for 2-3s (delay period)
monkey pick between l/r button

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

summarise monkey delay activity (Niki, 1974) finding a neural correlate between neuronal activity and WM- results

A

performed well
measured PFC- found spike trains (neuron firing) with initial spike at presentation of cues, sustained spike trains during delay (delay activity- persistent firing rate, bridging gap between stimulus presentation and choice being made)
then see sharp increase/sustained increase in firing rate, reflecting WM (monkey hold onto info, makes decisions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe what delay period tasks find regarding WM in monkeys (mention firing rates, spike trains)

A

delay activity is persistent firing rate bridging gap between stimulus and choice
monkey holds onto info during delay period and then see sharp increase then sustained increase in firing rate, reflecting WM processing (hold onto info, make decision)
less activity = monkey no longer needing info, its made its decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give strength of delay activity tasks in monkeys

A

high validity, seen in multiple studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

outline role of dopamine in classical conditioning, found with neuron fires

A

providing reward shows sustained spike activity of neuonrs firing dopamine
but if provide with CS, see actual dopaminergic responses tied to CS not reward (anticipation) and actual reward shows decreased activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

how can we tell if dopaminergic spike activity reflects WM

A

dopamine is neuromodular, respond to sensory stimuli which predicts future reward
so need to be mindful that dopamine tied into reward circuitry, importance of anticipation as well

18
Q

what do critics suggest about studies using monkeys to find neural basis for WM

A

monkey isn’t manipulating, instead just holding onto info so not really studying their WM

19
Q

what parts of brain do bird not have

A

no neocortex but still has subcortical structures like basal ganglia

20
Q

because bird brain appear more primitive, what is it believed they are unable to do

A

reason, however just because brain different to human, doesn’t mean cannot do what we do

21
Q

what part of bird brain is believed similar to human cortex

A

nidopallium caudolaterale (NCL)

22
Q

what is NCL (structure and function)

A

grey and white matter covering cerebrum
higher order association area, many dopaminergic innervation and receive afferent from secondary/tertiary sensory areas of all modality
project to most of somatic/limbic striatum, motor output structures
organised in nuclei

23
Q

what similarities between NCL and PFC

A

similar connections, with amygdala, nucleus accumbens, visceral structures

24
Q

NCL in WM has evidence from delay activites, what are these

A

single-cell studies in pigeons
trained to learn that remembering stimuli necessary to receive reward
reflected in NCL neuron in memory phases, suppressed when remembering stimulus was not needed

25
what insight-related cognitions can bird show?
object permanence, ToM, tool use
26
what birds is object permanence seen in
awareness object exist even if out of sight corvids (ie, magpie)
27
give example of how ToM shown in birds
attribute own mental state and possible future behaviours to another ravens show this for food catching behaviours
28
outline how birds show mental time travel
recollecting past episode, anticipating future needs and motivating states corvid store foods, recovers them, plan breakfast, catch food at places they previously learnt to be hungry in
29
outline how birds show tool use, and causal reasoning
selecting, manipulating objects in environment to utilise them in to achieve goal New Caldeonian Crow cut tool out of leaves, makes hook, lateralisation (start cutting tools from left side), meta-tool use (using 1 tool on another)
30
define analogue
same/similar function even if structures different
31
to test if NCL is functionally analogue to PFC, can use single unit recordings on WM tasks. apply using this on pigeons (Rose & Colombo), using auditoy cues, intervals, delay tasks -method
intertrial interval then sample (3 possible areas where stimulus can occur, diff stim each time) auditory cue= tells pigeon to remember/forget a. told to remember, 3s delay, make choice (overcome issue from Niki as no reward anticipation), select between 2 diff stim and have to remember what stim was, not just where it is b. have to forget
32
to test if NCL is functionally analogue to PFC, can use single unit recordings on WM tasks. apply using this on pigeons (Rose & Colombo), using auditoy cues, intervals, delay tasks -results from remember and forgetting conditions, regarding neuronal firing rates
in remember condition, sustained activity of increased firing rates, consisten from cue to end of delay (bridges gap between S-R, is likely to be reflecting WM) forgetting condition: see activity stop
33
why do we need to be careful when interpreting studies on WM regarding delay activity and neuron responding
abolished delay activity is linked to reward prediction so activity we see may simply be pigeon preparing the motor response to peck neurons able to change firing rate responding to forget (as no reward) discern between confounds of WM and reward prediction
34
what do delayed match-to-sample tasks entale, how do these solve methodology issues
disentangle WM from motor preparation as stimuli location randomly change chance of reward equal for all match item, and randomised meaning reward expectation negated pre-sample break to reset neuronal activity, have to encode memory for picture, delay, then pick 1/4 images for answer may/may not receive reward
35
what is found for crows on delayed match-to-sample tasks
very high performance
36
when studying if differences in firing rates of different neuronal populations, like for NCL what is found
sample selective neurons, responding different to each of 4 images, suggesting type of stimuli impact WM encoding cannot be due to preparation of motor response showing discrimination between items, extra level of processing, provide evidence
37
in conclusion, summarise relationship between NCL with WM, including neural bases
delay activity in NCL bridge time gap between stim, choice (evidence for neural basis of WM) neural circuit doesn't necessarily need neocortex both NCL, PFC are functionally analogue
38
cannot train bees to do a WM task, what can be done instead
time how long take bee fly point A-B, make linear function, present bee with stimuli along the linear function (pattern) by changing distance between sample point and where makes decision can know how long they have to hold onto info for at end of tunnel have to decide which to enter
39
on bee WM tasks, what was found, including WM duration
high performance in short delay task varying distance varied difficulty WM up to 6.5seconds
40
how can bee WM study task be made a bit harder
put in some incorrect patterns before/after sample stimulus, with correct pattern always present at same distances from tunnel entrance results show bee ignores patter really well
41
give advantages of studying cognitive functions in non-human animals
direct recordings AP (single cell recordings) which are very invasive high spatial, temporal accuracy - not possible from EEG, fMRI insight into cognitive nature, analogue of cognitions for different species
42
give disadvantages of studying cognitive functions in non-human animals
it is invasive cannot self-report, need training on task task doesn't reflect typical behavour hard to design tasks not including any confound (reward anticipation, motor prep, STM vs WM)