PSY3 Eating Behaviour Flashcards
(35 cards)
Attitudes to food/eating behaviour
**Social Learning: A01 **Parental Modelling
- Children acquire attitudes by observing behaviour of their parents
- Parental att. inevitably affect kids
- parents control foods bought/served in home
-
Brown/Ogden outline no. of ways parents exert influence:
- basic food pref
- healthy quality of diets
- concerns of weight gain/disordered eating behaviour
- Parents exert direct role through use of reward/punishment (operant)
A02 Parental modelling
-
Brown/Ogden - gen. association b/w parents/kids attitudes:
- correlation b/w parents/kids in terms of snack food intake, eating motivations and body dissatisfaction
- Birch/Fisher - found best predictors of daughters’ eating behaviour were mums’ dietry restraint/perception of risk of daughters becoming overweight
-
Hall/Brown - mums influence daughter’s satisfaction/dissatisfaction w/ body:
- mother’s of girls w/ anorexia show greater body dissatisfaction than mums of non-disordered girls
-
Birch - parents directly influence habits through use of praise/reward:
- praise from adult inc. food pref. for previously disliked food
-
but relationship is complex
- manipulating pref. may create unitended conseq/counterproductive
- kids offered juice as a means to be allowed to play showed that using juice as reward reduced pref. for juice (Lowe)
- manipulating pref. may create unitended conseq/counterproductive
Attitudes to food/eating behaviour:
A01 Peers
- As kids move into wider social world, become inc. influenced by food pref. of friends
- Gladwell/Harris - best way to get a child to eat something new is not by parental encouragement, but immersing child in room of kids who already like that food
- Teen years, children may actively differentiate self from parents/parents’ generation
- Certain foods favoured by teen compared w/ older age groups e.g. pizza, fried foods (Demroy-Luce/Motil)
A02 Peers
-
Birch - children will eat veg if friends do:
- selection/consumption of veg by pre-schoolers influenced by choices of peers
- children lunched next to kids who pref. different veg to self
- kids showed shift in veg pref. which persisted at follow-up assessment weeks later!
-
Lowe - impact of observational learning shown in intervention study designed to change eating behav:
- kids watched series of DVD adventures feauturing ‘fun/cool’ ‘Food Dudes’
A03 Attitudes to food/eating behaviour
-
Problems w/ generalisability - studies on clinical/non-clinical population:
- limits degree generalise from one group to another, thus degree to which studies offer understanding of causal factors
- Gender bias - conc. on women’s attitudes
-
male homosexuality risk factor in development of d/o (Siever).
- Findings attributed to male gay subculture - emphasis on lean, muscular body ideal
- limtd view
-
male homosexuality risk factor in development of d/o (Siever).
-
Need to consider other factors - emphasise imp. of ext. factors, underest. contribution of non-psycho exp.
- though may exp. specific likes/dislikes/habits, our basic food pref. determined by evolutionary forces
- humans have strong pref. for nutrient dense foods (meat/fat)
- pref. set in EEA and only moderated by direct experience
- humans have strong pref. for nutrient dense foods (meat/fat)
- though may exp. specific likes/dislikes/habits, our basic food pref. determined by evolutionary forces
Explanations for success/failure diets:
A01 Restraint theory
- Restraint inc. probability of overeating
- Herman/Polivy developed Boundary Model to exp. why dieting –> overeating
- Hunger - when/how much to eat
- Satiation - occurs when brain judges that eating more not in person’s best interest
- For ancestors, finding food required effort/time, so when person’s eaten optimal amount, brain signals stop, do something to aid survival!
- When food plentiful, satiation reached easily
- don’t need to eat large amounts in single meal as it’s avail in near future
- But reg. bouts hunger indicate uncertain food supply
- brain biochem adjusts to satiation less easily achieved - brain judges that food’s scarce
- When opportunity to comsume arises, org. should consume lots, for it may be while until another opportunity arises
- Dieting widens gap between hunger/satiation
A02 Restraint theory
-
Wardle/Beale - 27 obese women: women in diet cond. ate more than women in exercise & control group; confirmed model’s predications.
- Strength - assessment under lab cond.
-
Gender bias - research only conc. on success/fail of women’s dieting; studies providing insight only offer limtd exp.
- Not generalisable to opposite gender? Don’t provide universal exp. for reasons of success/failure.
-
Implications for obesity treatment - theory says restraint –> overeating, yet treatment commonly used as solution to exc. weight gain.
- But failed attempts to diet leaves obese depressed/feeling failure
- This is why there may be more emphasis on fitness than diet!
- Ogden - though obesity not necessarily result of overeating, it may be consequence of obesity if restraint used as treatment.
- But failed attempts to diet leaves obese depressed/feeling failure
Explanations for success/failure diets:
A01 Role of denial/Ironic processes
- Research shows trying to suppress/deny thoughts freq. has opposite effect, making it more prominent (Wegner/white bears)
- A.K.A ‘theory of ironic processes of mental control’ - rep. a paradoxical effect of thought control i.e. denial backfires
- Denial of food tends to make us think of it more than normal; can become pre-occupation
- As food’s denied, it simultaneously becomes more attractive
- Dieter may find only way to deal w/ issue is to succumb to temptation, consume food in question
A02 Role of denial
-
Practical application - Wegner suggests dieters think of issues differently; rather than thinking “I must not eat” should reformulate challenge to “I must get fit”.
- Ppl may be more successful by focusing on fitness, not diet.
-
Soetens - disinhibited restrained eaters used more thought suppression than unrestrained/low disinhibition, showed rebound effect after (thought of more food)
- Restrained eaters who overeat try to suppress thoughts more often, but when they do, think more of food after
A03 of success/failure of diets
-
Culturally biased - some cultural grps find it harder to diet successfully due to natural inclination to obesity
- Asian adults more prone to obesity than EU (Park); asian kids/teens have a great central fat mass compared to EU (Misra)
-
Due to lifestyle or genes? - issue to degree which lifestyle determines failure/success
- likely that genetic mechanisms influence weight
- H. levels enzyme LPL associated w/ greater weight gain.
- Researchers believe weight loss activates gene prod. LPL, may exp. why it’s easier to regain lost weight than for one who has never been obese to put on weight
- Determinism plays greater role in success, not free will
- likely that genetic mechanisms influence weight
Neural mechanisms in eating behaviour:
A01 Homeostasis
- Involves mechanisms which detect state of int. environment/correct situation to restore envrionment to optimal state
- Hunger inc. as glucose levels dec.
- Decline in glucose activates lateral hypothalamus, results in hunger, cause person to search/consume food = levels to inc. again
- Activates ventromedial hypothalamus, leads to feelings of satiation, which inhibits feeding
A02 Homeostasis
-
Lashley - evidence for role of hypothalamus:
- cut out diff areas of rats brain to see effect of lesions on behavior
-
LH identified as ‘hunger centre’, VMH ‘satiety centre’
- lesions to LH caused animals to stop eating spontaneously
- reverse occurred after lesions made to VMH
- lesions in VMH caused rats to overeat!
- Probs w/ animal studies!!!!
- Limitations - for hunger mechanism to be adaptive, must anticipate/prevent energy deficits, not just react!
- Suggests hunger only triggered when energy falls below desired level
- Incompatible w/ situations in which systems would’ve evolved!
- For mechanism to be adaptive, must promote levels of consumption that maintain bodily resources above optimal to act as buffer against future lack food
- Suggests hunger only triggered when energy falls below desired level
Neural mechanisms in eating behaviour
A01 Role of leptin
- Fat hormone leptin is an example of a neuropeptide
- Secreted from fat cells into the blood and signals the brain (via the hypothalamus) that calorie availability is high - leads to satiation
- When fat reserves are used for energy production, leptin secretion falls
- hypothalamus detects this, interprets low leptin as lack of calories and generates sensation of hunger
A02 Role of leptin
-
Zhang - evidence for role of leptin:
- some mice received 2 copies of gene related to leptin regulation (ob/ob)
- have tendency to overeat, esp. foods h. in fat/sugar
-
ob/ob mice have defective genes for leptin regulation
- injecting ob/ob mice w/ leptin causes them to lose weight dramatically
- direct evidence of leptin in human eating behav come from rare cases of ppl born w/ leptin deficiency
- can’t control their eating, freq. become obese - take leptin injections to return to normal weight
- Problems w/ animal research!!!!!
- some mice received 2 copies of gene related to leptin regulation (ob/ob)
Neural mechanisms in eating behaviour:
A01 Role of Ghrelin
- Ghrelin, **a **neuropeptide thought to be the ‘hunger hormone’
- Produced in stomach and hypothalamus
- Levels inc. before meals as stomach muscle contracts/stretches
- Dec. after meals when stomach’s full
- Receptors of ghrelin found in lateral hypothalamus (brain!), h. levels associated w/ hunger and low levels w/ satiation
A02 Role of Ghrelin
-
Zigman - explains why low mood leads to comfort eating:
- ghrelin linked w/ appetite regulation/stress resistance
- mice genetically engineered to prod. low levels of hormone
- mice exposed to social stress (sharing enclosure with big mice)
- normal would would inc. consumption of h. calorie food - special mice didn’t!
-
suggest ghrelin imp. in triggering comfort eating
- suggests biochem mechanism to block this chemical action may be possible treatment for mood-related eating disorders!
-
suggest ghrelin imp. in triggering comfort eating
- Probs w/ animal studies!!!!
A03 of neural mechanisms in eating behaviour
-
Reductionist - implications of psychological/physiological hunger:
- there’s diff b/w physical hunger and psychological hunger
-
other learned/cognitive factors:
- e.g availability of rich foods - ppl tend to gain weight when food plentiful
- smell - some can’t resist feeling hungry even if they’re not physically hungry
- ext. stimulu provide other ways to signal LH to make up feel hungary even if not physically (Hara)
-
other learned/cognitive factors:
- exp. only focus on LH/bio factors - reductionist!!!
- there’s diff b/w physical hunger and psychological hunger
Evolutionary exp. for food pref.
A01 Preference for meat
- Human ancestors incl. meat in diet to compensate for decline in quality of plants
- Meat diet, full of nutrients, provided the catalyst for brain growth
- We’re hard-wired to consume meat as it was v. difficult to ancestors to obtain this!
- W/o animals, claims Milton, it’s unlikely that early humans could’ve secured enough nutrition from a vege diet to evolve into the intelligent creatures they became!
A02 Preference for meat
-
Cultural differences in food pref - vast majority of spec. food likes/dislikes appear not to be predetermined.
- Though strong affinity of kids for sweets seem universal, innate response don’t account for broad range of likes/dislikes that develop beyond infancy.
- Evolved factors clearly important, but exp. w/ diff foods, w/ culture partly determining this, modify this!
Evolutionary exp. for food pref:
A01 Taste aversion
- Bait shyness: animals that became ill after eating, developed aversion to that food
- Development of taste aversions aided our ancestors in survival, as surviving from eating poisoned food ensured they would not make same mistake again
- Once learnt, difficult to shift - adaptive quality designed to keep ancestors alive
A02/A03 Taste aversion
-
Garcia rats who were made ill through radiation shortly after eating saccharin, developed aversion to it v. quickly
- associated illness w/ saccharin
-
Real-world application - research origins of taste aversion helpful in understanding food avoidance that sometimes occur during treatment of cancer:
- some cancer treatments cause gastrointestinal illness
- when illness pairs w/ food consumption, taste aversions can result
-
Bernstein/Webster - gave patients novel-tasting ice cream prior to their chemotherapy –> patients acquired aversion to that icecream
- fled to development of ‘scapegoat technique’ - give patient novel food w/ familiar food prior to treatment
-
patient forms aversion to novel food and not familiar
- consistent w/ adaptive avoidance of novel foods - neophobia
-
patient forms aversion to novel food and not familiar
- fled to development of ‘scapegoat technique’ - give patient novel food w/ familiar food prior to treatment
A02/A03 Evolutionary exp. for food preference
- Reductionist - oversimplifies complex human behaviour to evolutionary mechanisms, ignoring psychological/cognitive factors
- Determinism - overlooks freewill and conscious cognitive and social factors (e.g. dieting, social learning.)
Psychological exp. for AN:
Social learning
A01/A02 Cultural ideals/media
- Widely held belief Western standards of attractiveness imp. in AN development
- Studies show many teens (esp. girls) dissatisfied w/ weight/have distorted body image
- Media’s source of influence for body image attitudes maintined by West teens
- Portrayal of thin models on TV/mags signif. in body image concerns/drive for thinness among Western teens girls
- Media doesn’t influence all in same way e.g. ppl w/ l. self-esteem likelier to compare selves to idealised images portayed in media (Jones/Buckingham)
A02/A03 Culture/media
-
Hoek - AN not confined to West:
- tested view that AN rare in non-West:
- examined records of over 44,000 ppl admitted to hospital over 2 year in Curacao (non-West), where it’s acceptable to be overweight
- 6 cases of AN, rate claimed to be within range of West
- tested view that AN rare in non-West:
-
Bio factors - don’t exp. individual differences:
- fail to exp. why some develop AN and others don’t when they’re exposed same cultural influences/experiences/media
- AN partly influenced by bio/genetic!
- fail to exp. why some develop AN and others don’t when they’re exposed same cultural influences/experiences/media
-
Real-world application - fashion industry acknowledged damaging infl. of media on body image, by signing charter of good will
- Charter first step in stopping eating d/o, promoting healthy body image among young women
- Charter involves a pledge by fashion houses, advertising agencies/mag editors to use diversity of body types, not stereotype of ‘thin ideal’