Psych 282 midterm two Flashcards
What are some of the names that can be used for operant conditioning
Instrumental conditioning
Why do we not use the term stimulus when discussing operant conditioning?
Stimulus is kind of a catchall term, while it can refer to the antecedent, (the situation that says the behaviour is possible/the situation that happens before the potential behaviour) it can also refer to consequences ex food is a consequence but it is also a stimulus so using the term stimulus can make it confusing.
Reinforcement
The process in which a behaviour is strengthened (made more likely to occur under similar circumstances- in the presence of similar or the same antecedents, increases the likelihood of the behaviour occurring) by the immediate consequence that reliably follows.
What does temporal contiguity meaning
Refers to the time between the behaivour and the consequence if the consequence occurs immediately after the behaivour we have ideal temporal contiguity. think temp like temporary measure of how long something lasts just like ammount of time and contiguity like continuing ammount of time before sequence continues, behaviour occurs and then consequence is followed the ammount of time it takes for the sequence to continue).
What does contingency mean?
Contingent means something follows something refers to how reliablly the events occur in the sequence, ideally you always have the consequence follow the behaviour establishing strong clear rules of the sequence
What is the difference between thorndikes incremental learning and acquisition.
In acquisition learning occurs at the highest rate when their is the most surprised- when the pairing first occurs, then eventually when they come to quit being surprised then it shows that they have learned to see one stimulus as a relaible predictor of another stimulus illustrating that learning has occured so increases and then eventually reaches a point where it will no longer keep increasing. Thorndikes curve of incremental improvement on the other hand measured the ammount of time it took for the cats to escape, (latency) so the longer the latency the longer the time it took them to escape the less of a strong association they had between the antecedent and the behaivour so longer is worse.
How do we determine what type of consequence a consequence is?
When we are trying to classify what type of consequence a consequence is we do not examine the intentions behind it instead we only examine how it ends up actually affecting future behaviour to determine what type of consequence it is.
What is positive reinforcement?
If we are adding something that ends up making a behaviour more likely to occur in the future then we are adding something appetitive, since we are adding something it is positive and since the thing we are adding is appetitive, (it makes the behaivour more likley to occur in the future) it is reinforcement.
What is positive punishment?
When we are adding something, (making it positive) that ends up making the behaviour less likely to occur in the future, (making it aversive- note it may not be intended to be aversive could be intended as a reward however if it ends up being misjudged and is actually something that the subject does not like it will end up decreasing the likelihood of the behaivour in the future making it a punishment, (we do not care about what a consequence is supposed to do when determining what type of consequence a consequence is, we only care about what it actually ends up doing).
What is negative reinforcement?
Negative means removing, reinforcemnt means a consequence that ends up making a behaivour more likely to occur in the future so negative reinforcement means taking something away in order to make a behaviour more likely to occur in the future, so we are taking something bad, something aversive away.
What is negative punishment?
Negative means removing, punishing means a consequence that makes a behaviour less likely to occur so we are removing something that to the individual is good, (appetitive)
If we find that when we put on sunglasses then our eyes become less painful what kind of consequence is this?
Negative reinforcement, in order to identify what the consequence is we need to determine the behaviour, (what we are looking at to see if it will be more or less likely to occur in the future), in this case putting on sunglasses is the behaviour. Since putting sunglasses on is the behaivour the consequence is that we no longer experience pain in our eyes- this is negative reinforcement, bc while yes adding sunglasses does add something good the sunglasses alone are not rewarding, (we would likely not consider them to be an appetitive stimulus when we are not exposed to the sun) rather they are rewardng because they get rid of an aversive stimulus - the pain caused by the sun in our eyes. When determining the nature of the consequence we must examine why it is likley rewarding or punishimng, (is it taking away something bad or adding something good that is not good simply because it takes away something bad- that is good alone without the presence of the bad thing that it will take away)
What does outcome mean, how does it fit into our ABC’s?
Outcome is not the same as a consequence outcome is like the aftermath of a consequence ex. in a car with friends and drive fast end up being praised, in this case the antecedent, (the information that lets us know that a behaviour can be performed and which consequence will likely follow- in this case being in the ccar with friends) driving fast is the behaviour, being praised is the consequence and then the outcome is that we will be more likely to perform the behaviour in the presence of our friends because we know that we will likely be praised. Outcome is like an arrow that loops back from consequence to antecedent, is involved in how we see antecedent in a future circumstance due to the consequence of that occured previously in this circumstance.
What can classical conditioning be reffered to as?
Respondent conditioning
What does operant behaivour or instrumental response refer to?
Behaviour that has occured due to operant learning
How do we determine if it is reinforcing or punishing?
We examine how our conditions are after the consequence was delivered if they are better then it is reinforcing if they are worse it is punishing
What does saying a consequence had no effect on behaviour not mean?
When we say that a consequence had no effect on behaviour we do not mean that it maintains the behaviur bc if a consequence is maintaining the behaviour that means that it is making it so the behaviour keeps occuring in the future where if the consequence wasn’t there it likely wouldn’t so this makes something that maintains a behaviour a reinforcer.
What is an escape behaviour
Negative reinforcment, a behaviour we do to escape from an aversive stimulus, ex. if rats are in a shuttle box one side of the floor will become electirified and the other will not this means that the rats can run to the other side in order to escape the aversive stimulus of the electrified floor.
What is an operant and what is not an operant?
An operant refers to a behaviour that is established/maintained through reinforcement, an operant can not be maintained through punishment as a punishment decreases the likelihood of a behaviour and operant does not refer to the absense of a behaviour.
What is avoidant behaviour
Behaviour that is done after we have a) been introduced to an aversive stimulus and b) been introduced to something that acts as a reliable predictor that, that aversive stimulus will come. Ex. Rats are in a shuttle boc have the unconditioned stimulus be the floor being electrified, (the aversive stimulus) which leads them to perform the response of running, if they learn that a red light serves as a reliable predictor that the floor will become electrified the formerly neutral stimulus of the red light will now become a conditioned stimulus and cause them to display the same response they did to the aversive stimulus, (the conditioned response), technically this is still negative reinforcement because the red light arouses feelings of anticipation and fear of the arrival of the aversive stimulus which goes away once the rat does the action that allows them to avoid it, (since the anticipation of the aversive stimulus itself is unpleasant it becomes an aversive stimulus that gets removed when the rat does the action that allows them to avoid the aversive stimulus- making it negative reinforcement)
Can we say that something is reinforcing in a theoretical context?
No we can not say that something was reinforcing in a theoretical context. In order to label something as reinforcing we have to be able to say that it made the behaviour more likely to occur in the future and in order to say that something made the behaviour more likely to occur in the future we have to see that it made the behaviour more likely to occur in the future by seeing an increase or continuation of the behaviour in the future, so we have to have seen the behaivour repeated in order to label the consequence as reinforcing and therefore we can not label something as theoretically reinforcing- is only reinforcing when we have seen that it increases the behaivour by seeing an increase in the behaivour.
Can wether a stimulus is a reinforcer or not differ depending on conditions?
Yes, wether a stimulus acts as a reinforcer or not can differ depending on deprivation and satiation, ex if we do not have chocolate for a month then we have been deprived of it so we will likely want it more making it more reinforcing however if we have just eaten several bars of chocolate we likley will not want anymore because we have been siatied by it so it is no longer reinforcing.
What is a trial
With operant conditioning a trial counts as a single occurrence of the behaviour followed by a single occurrence of the consequence
What is an intertrial interval
The time between one trial and another trial, (where a trial counts as when the behaviour occurs once and a consequence occurs once)