psych 295 exam 1 Flashcards

(68 cards)

1
Q

theory data cycle

A

theory, research questions, research design, hypothesis, data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does theory data cycle allow us to claim

A

can’t say that you proved a theory, only support it. You can disprove a theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Difference between theory and hypothesis

A

theory is broader framework of ideas, logic, evidence that helps come up with research designs, hypothesis is given specific research design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 types of measurement or data

A

self-report, physiological, behavioral observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

deception by comission

A

when u actively tell participant a cover story about the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

deception by omission

A

leaving something out and not telling participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

variable

A

2 or more levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

constant

A

1 level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

type I error

A

finds an effect in the sample and there is not one aka false alarm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

type II error

A

says there is no effect in the sample but there is one in the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

p value

A

tells u the probability of type 1 error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 reliabilities

A

test-retest, internal, interrater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

reliability

A

consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

validity

A

measuring what you think your measuring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

types and functions of scientific publications

A

peer-reviewed journals, empirical article, review articles, meta-analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

independent variable

A

manipulated variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

dependent variable

A

measured variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

types of correlation

A

positive, negative, none, curvilinear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

3 causal criteria

A

temporal precedence, internal validity, covariance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

basic research

A

basic processes of behavior, designed to advance theory, cares about “why”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

applied research

A

immediate practical implications, designed to answer practical problem, cares about “so what”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

translational research

A

studies where scientists intentionally use the results of basic research to develop and test applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

epistemology

A

the way we know things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

2 ways to know things

A

logic and empiricism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
syllogism
premise 1, premise 2, conclusion
26
modus tollens
If P then Q Not Q Therefore not P
27
modus ponens
if P then Q P Therefore Q
28
a good theory
1. empirically supported by date 2. logically falsifiable 3. simpler is better than complex
29
3 claims
1. frequency 2. association 3. causal
30
4 validities
1. construct 2. internal 3. external 4. statistical
31
conceptional definition
concept of interest defined according to theoretical and logical considerations. process of turning COI into manipulated/measured variable
32
operational definition
a statement of procedures used to define variables
33
operational variable
measured. self report, physiological, behavioral observations
34
frequency claims
focus on 1 variable, variable is measured not manipulated
35
association claim
2 variables, measured not manipulated, argues 1 variable is associated with another
36
casual claims
at least 2 variables, manipulated variable
37
criteria for causal claims
1. correlation 2. temporal precedence 3. internal validity
38
temporal precedence
the principle that the cause must be shown to have occurred before the effect.
39
construct validity
how well variables in the study are measured or manipulated
40
external validity
degree to which the results generalize to some larger populations and situations
41
statistical validity
sample vs population, how well the study minimizes the probability of 2 types pf errors, adreses strength of result
42
internal validity
extent to which significant relationship between 2 variables is causal and not spurious
43
the belmont report
respect for persons, beneficence, justice
44
respect for persons
informed consent, protect the vulnerable
45
beneficence
cost-benefit analysis for participants
46
justice
how are participants selected, do they represent people who will benefit from the study
47
ethical standards
- irb -informed consent -deception -debriefing -animal research -research misconduct
48
data fabrication
completely making up data for a study
49
data falsification
tweaking or changing data in a study
50
different scales of measurement
categorical or quantitative
51
categorical scales
data categories are mutually exclusive, data categories have no logical order
52
ordinal scale
unequal intervals, rank ordering of categories
53
interval scale
equal unit scales, no beginning to scales
54
ratio scale
equal intervals, what we normally think of a measurement, meaningful 0
55
face validity
whether the test appears (at face value) to measure what it claims to
56
content validity
the extent to which a test measures a representative sample of the subject matter or behavior under investigation.
57
criterion validity
measures how well one measure predicts an outcome for another measure
58
convergent validity
the extent to which responses on a test or instrument exhibit a strong relationship with responses on conceptually similar tests or instruments.
59
discriminant validity
tests whether concepts or measurements that are not supposed to be related are actually unrelated
60
3 R's of animal research
replace, reduce, refine
61
scientific principles
observation/question, research, hypothesis, test, analyze data, report conclusions
62
quantitative data
numerical data that can be statistically analyzed
63
qualitative data
non-numerical data
64
categorical data
any of several statistical procedures used to model variables that indicate counts or observations in specific categories
65
present bias
focus on positive instances more than negative ones
66
confirmation bias
cherry-picking the evidence; seek and accept evidence that supports our view, confirms our beliefs
67
bias blind spot
the tendency to think that other people are more susceptible to attributional biases in their thinking than we are
68
availability heuristic
aka pop-up principle, things that come easily to mind and guide our thinking