Psych Exam Flashcards
(38 cards)
Park and Rothbart (1982) AIM
Investigate if people would show in-group bias and create broad generalizations about people in an out-group
Park and Rothbart (1982) PROCEDURE
Research was conducted on 3 sororities at the University of Oregon that was similar in proximity and values. 90 participants total (30 from each) answered a questionnaire in which they had to rank their sorority and another sorority on ten dimensions: studious, physical attractiveness, economic status, group cohesion, strictness, etc. Responses were ranked on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0- not at all characteristics to 7- extremely characteristic. Participants were also asked to rate on a 9-point scale how similar people were within their sorority + how similar were people in an opposing sorority. 9 - extremely similar to 0- extremely dissimilar
Park and Rothbart (1982) FINDINGS
All three sorority members viewed their sorority members as being more dissimilar and perceived the out-group members as more similar to one another. This is known as the out-group homogeneity effect. The results also showed that each sorority member ranked their sorority high in favorable characteristics such as physical attractiveness and ranked these low when assessing out-groups
Park and Rothbart (1982) CONCLUSION
People generalize out-groups unfavorably and demonstrate an in-group bias. Out-group homogeneity effect can aid in the creation of stereotypes, as there is a preconceived notion about a group of people. Also demonstrates positive distinctiveness as participants show in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination
Social Identity Theory
Social identity theory is a theory of intergroup conflict and aims to explain why conflict and discrimination occur as a result of social categorization, identification, social comparison, and positive distinctiveness. The theory is rooted in the premise that there exist two different types of self. There is a social identity (in terms of social groups) and personal identity (the more individual and private self). The theory links social identity and conflict through various mechanisms.
Social Categorization
the existence of social identities based on social groups lead to social categorization - the cognitive process of categorizing people into in-groups and out-groups based on a particular characteristic.
Social Identification
Identification is when members identify themselves as a member of a social group and take on their values and beliefs. Some of these groups such as nationality are by default, while others are by choice.
Social Comparison
in identifying with a social group, this distinction leads to a highly related process of making direct comparisons between your group (the in-group) and other groups (the out-group)
Positive Distinctiveness
to achieve a positive social identity and increase self-esteem, members of a group will typically strive to make themselves better (positive) and different (distinct) from out-groups. Positive distinctiveness lead to actions that typically perpetuate out-group discrimination (disadvantages for the out-group) and in-group favouritism (bias towards the benefits of the in-group). Can also result in the out-group homogeneity effect: perceiving out-group members as being more similar to one another than in-group members. This can lead to stereotypes and similar poor treatment of out-group members. As a result, conflict is caused by our desire to create a positive social identity.
Kearney and Levine (2014) AIM
Assess the impact of the show “16 and pregnant” on teen sexual behaviour and the rate of teen pregnancy
Kearney and Levine (2014) PROCEDURE
The reality TV show follows the lives of pregnant teenagers during the final months of their pregnancy. Identified geographic areas (e.g. particular cities) where the show “16 and pregnant” was particularly popular. Measured whether these geographic areas had a greater reduction in teen pregnancy compared to other areas where the show was not as popular. Also analyzed Google searches immediately following a new episode of “16 and pregnant”
Kearney and Levine (2014) FINDINGS
Areas where the show was popular, had a greater reduction (4.3%) in teen pregnancy compared with other areas in the 18 months following the initial airing. After the show there typically was a spike in Google searched for terms such as “how to get birth control”
Kearney and Levine (2014) CONCLUSION
The show had a positive impact in reducing the rate of teen pregnancy. Supports the idea of vicarious learning as viewers were discouraged from having children at a young age because of how challenging it is.
Socialization
the process of becoming a member of a social group by providing the individual with the skills, habits, and norms necessary for participating within their society.
Primary Socialization
a child learns the basic rules and norms of living in his or her group. Typically this begins at the most basic level in the family, school, and peer groups.
Secondary Socialization
includes elements of the larger community, extended family, and the media. Such forces tend to influence adherence to or deviance from norms indirectly. Developed by Albert Bandura, the theory is an attempt to explain how we learn from others and how socialization, the transmission of cultural norms, occurs. Contrary to behaviorist theory that states all learning is from direct experience of rewards and punishments, Bandura suggested learning can also be done through observational learning - learning through the observation of others. Bandura recognized that certain conditions are necessary for observational learning to take place: Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Potential
Attention
observers must attend the modelled behaviour. This is typically achieved if the observer can closely identify with the model and are from the same in-group
Retention
behavior must be consistent and easy to remember
Motivation
observers must want to reproduce the behavior and expect a certain outcome from it or avoid a certain consequence
Potential
observers must physically and/or mentally be able to carry out the behavior. There needs to be a level of self-efficacy - a belief one can master particular skills or behavior
Stereotype
a preconceived notion about a group of people. They tend to be generalizations about entire groups. This differs from prejudice which is a preconceived negative belief about an individual based on their group membership and discrimination which is negative behavior based on a stereotype or prejudice. Rooted in two underlying cognitive processes: 1. Categorization: placing people into a category based on an attribute 2. Generalization: applying a belief to all members of a group
Stereotypes may form indirectly as a product of culture and society, in which gatekeepers, peers, and/or media, can have an impact in creating and/or reinforcing stereotypes. Stereotypes may also form directly as a result of our own experience with other people. The grain of truth hypothesis - suggests that stereotypes are based on small truths people have experienced. For example, having a male doctor and believing all doctors are male. Both these theories are further reinforced by ideas of the out-group homogeneity effect, which describes how we perceive out-group members as being more similar to another than an in-group members. This makes it easier for stereotypes and generalizations to form. Lastly, stereotypes may be made from illusory correlations which is when people see two variables as related when they are not. For example, perceived correlations between a group and a trial and/or behaviour are exaggerated, despite being statistically less frequent.
Self-fulfilling prophecy
people unconsciously change their behaviour, causing a schema to become true. The stereotype may be positive or negative.
Stereotype threat
members of the stereotyped group may inadvertently reinforce a negative stereotype by changing their behavior as a result of increased anxiety and apprehension. Therefore, causing the negative schema to become true
Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) AIM
Investigate whether students of whom greater intellectual growth is expected will show greater intellectual growth