Psych Paper 3 Terms and Concepts Flashcards

Understanding the design and methods of psychology studies (19 cards)

1
Q

Case studies

A
  • A study into an individual or a specific group which uses multiple sources of data to provide a rich and detailed analyses

2 characteristics
- highly in-depth and detailed investigation
- Uses multiple data collection methods (think of HM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Naturalistic observation

A
  • A study which observes participants/individuals in their natural environments without manipulating an IV

2 characteristics:
- Studied while participants are in their natural environment
- Researchers do not have any direct intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interviews

A
  • Researchers ask participants a set of questions, and collect data via their responses

2 characteristics:
- More personable and flexible to questionairs/surveys
- Participants verbally share their thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Experiment

A
  • Has an IV, and a DV, experiments aim to establish the effect of one variable on another in order to establish causation

3 characteristics:
- Have hypothesis
- Manipulate an IV to investigate the effect on a DV
- Consist of two or more conditions for participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quasi Experiment

A
  • An experiment where the IV is naturally occurring and not introduced by researchers
  • Like experiments, they attempt to find a causation, but due to their nature introduce high amounts of confounding variables

2 Characteristics:
- The IV is not manipulated by the researchers
- participants are grouped based on pre-existing conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Correlational Study

A
  • Research which investigates the relationship between two variables, they are unable to establish causation

2 Characteristics:
- Attempt to establish the relationship / correlation between two or more variables
- cannot establish causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Independent sampling

A
  • A study where participants are subjected to only one condition, and do not experience all of the conditions
  • Is good as it allows for reduction of order effects and demand characteristics
  • Flawed due to participant variables (individual differences)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Repeated measures design

A
  • A study where participants are subjected to all conditions of the experiment
  • Enables the reduction of participant variables (individual differences)
  • Introduces potential demand characteristics and order effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Random Sampling

A
  • A sample where participants are randomly selected from a specific population
  • Serves to be representative of the population as everyone has an equal chance of being selected

2 characteristics:
- Representative of the entire target population
- Out of a population, every individual has an equal chance of being selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Convenience/Opportunity Sampling

A
  • A sample of participants which were chosen due their easy availability
  • A weak method of sampling as it introduces sampling bias where participants are not representative of the entire population

2 characteristics:
- It is convenient for the researchers
- Isn’t representative and can result in low generalizability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-Selected Sampling

A
  • A sample of participants which volunteered for the experiment
  • Only recruits types of individuals who are likely to accept offers to partake in a study

2 characteristics:
- Participants volunteer to partake in the study
- Results in biases which limits generalizability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ecological Validity

A
  • Describes how applicable results of an experiment are to real-world settings/contexts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Generalizability

A
  • Describes how well a sample within a study may be used to apply the results on them to a wider population
  • (e.g, do effects of an IV to a sample of only doctors cross over to how this same IV would affect the UK’s public?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Demand Characteristics

A
  • A variable which occurs when participants discover what the aim of the study may be, which therefore influences their response to a condition/IV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Internal Validity

A
  • How well a study ensures that the observed effect on the dependent variable (DV) is solely due to the independent variable (IV), without interference from confounding variables.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

External Validity

A
  • The extent to which the findings of a study can be generalized to other people, settings, and time periods.
17
Q

Reliability

A
  • How consistent a study’s results are
  • (e.g, in interviews, if questions aren’t strictly standardised they have low reliability)
18
Q

Snowball sampling

A
  • A method of sampling where participants recruit other participants from their social networks

2 characteristics
- Participants recruit other participants
- Useful for hard to reach populations

19
Q

Naturalistic Experiment

A
  • An experiment which takes place in a real-world setting rather than a controlled laboratory, and the independent variable is naturally occurring
  • (e.g, the impact of natural disaster on mental health)

2 Characteristics:
- The IV is naturally occurring
- high ecological validity