psychiatric harm Flashcards

1
Q

what is psychiatric harm

A

must be an actual, medically recognised psychiatric condition, which is long term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

vernon v bosley

A

grief doesn’t constitute as psychiatric harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

reiley v merseyside RHA

A

normal human emotions after an unpleasant experience don’t constitute towards psychiatric harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

examples of psychiatric harm

A
  • insomnia
  • clinical depression
  • PTSD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

key case for primary and secondary victims

A

Alcock v CCSY
- relates to whether the claimant is a primary or secondary victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

using a case example, explain who is a primary victim

A

page v smith
people who are at risk of physical injury, whether or not they actually feared for it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

dulieu v white

A

primary victims are people who are fearful for their own safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

using a case example, explain who is a secondary victim

A

McLoughlin
secondary victims are people who suffer psychiatric harm but aren’t physically injured or at risk of physical injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

foreseeability for secondary victims

A

was psychiatric harm foreseeable in a person of normal phlegm and fortitude as a result of defendants actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how do we test proximity for secondary victims

A

use the four control mechanisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

control mechanism one

A

close tie of love and affection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Alcock in control mechanism one

A

relatives are more likely to succeed in an action for psychiatric harm because of their closeness. Also, the relationship between children/parents and spouses are automatically qualified, the rest have to be proven

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

McLoughlin in control mechanism one

A

the closer the tie the greater the claim for consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

control mechanism two

A

present at the scene or its immediate aftermath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

McLoughlin in control mechanism two

A

immediate aftermath extended to two hours and also to the hospital where claimants family was

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Alcock in control mechanism two

A

family arrived 8 hours in the mortuary after the event

17
Q

what to consider when deciding if claimant was at the immediate aftermath

A
  • amount of time that has passed since the event
  • purpose of claimants visit
  • what did the claimant actually witness
18
Q

control mechanism three

A

witnessed the event or its immediate aftermath with unaided senses

19
Q

Alcock in control mechanism three

A

not enough to have witnessed the event on TV

20
Q

Boylan v Keegan in control mechanism three

A

can not be through the phone

21
Q

control mechanism four

A

claimants condition must have been brought on suddenly due to the horrifying event

22
Q

Alcock in control mechanism four

A

psychiatric harm has to be caused by shock

23
Q

Sion v HHA in control mechanism four

A

didn’t satisfy as shock as the dad watched the son die for over 14 days