psychological explanations for offending behaviour Flashcards
(39 cards)
support for the criminal personality
eysenck
what does eysenck support
criminal personality
describe eysenck
compared 2070 male prisoners’ scores on the EPI with 2422 controls. on all three traits, across all age groups, the prisoners had higher scores than the controls.
evidence for cultural bias in criminal personality
bartol and holanchock
what does bartol and holanchock show
cultural bias in the criminal personality
describe bartol and holanchock
found that hispanic and african-american offenders were less extraverted than non-criminals
contradictory evidence for criminal personality
farrington
what does farrington contradict
criminal personality
describe farrington
found that offenders tended to score high on psychoticism, but not extraversion or neuroticism.
support for levels of moral reasoning
kohlberg
what does kohlberg support
levels of moral reasoning
describe kohlberg
studied boys aged 7, 10, 13, and 16, giving them interviews about moral dilemmas. found that younger boys were in level 1, pre-morality, and older boys were in level 2 - conventional morality
evidence for cultural bias in levels of moral reasoning
gibbs
what does gibbs show
cultural bias in levels of moral reasoning
describe gibbs
suggested that kohlberg’s post-conventional stage of moral reasoning was culturally biased to western cultures
contradictory evidence for levels of moral reasoning
thornton and reid, langdon
what does thornton and reid contradict
levels of moral reasoning
describe thornton and reid
found that the level of moral reasoning in criminals depended on the crime they had committed
what does langdon contradict
levels of moral reasoning
describe langdon
suggested that intelligence may be a better predictor of criminal behaviour, rather than moral reasoning
support for hostile attribution bias
schonenburg and justye, dodge and frame
what does schonenburg and justye support
hostile attribution bias
what does dodge and frame support
hostile attribution bias
schonenburg and justye
presented 55 violent offenders with images of emotionally ambiguous faces. when compared to a matched, non-aggressive control group, violent offenders found more images hostile or aggressive