Psychological Explenations For Obesity Flashcards
(8 cards)
What are the 3 models that can cognitively explain obesity
-Restraint theory
-Disinhibition
-The boundary model
Restraint theory
-Dieters deliberately restrict food
-This requires a level of cognitive control whereby they must think about not eating, categorising allowed and forbidden foods
-This is paradoxical because it makes restrained eaters more preoccupied with thoughts of food instead of less
-They then actively attempt to ignore physiological indicators that signal hunger
-This leads to disinhibited eating and weight gain leading to obesity
Disinhibition cycle
-Food restriction, more vulnerable
-internal disinhibitor cues (low mood, anxious)
-external disinhibitor cues (smells, media)
-Leads to unrestricted binge eating (disinhibited eating)
-Cognitive preocceses maintain this disinhibited eating such as all or nothing thinking - I blew it, I might as well start tomorrow
The boundary model for non restrained eaters
-When energy levels dip below a certain point, we feel aversion hunger and are motivated to eat
-When we reach the aversion of satiety, we are motivated to stop by feeling discomfort
-Between the two points is the zone of indifference where biological factors don’t have much role but instead cognitive and social factors like meal times
-Neither hungry nor full
The boundary model for restrained eaters
-They have a lower hunger boundary and a higher satiety boundary, therefore they have a wider zone of biological indifference which makes them more vulnerable to cognitive pressures rather than biological
-They also have a self imposed diet boundary which is far below the satiety boundary
-When restrained eaters break the diet boundaries, they experience the what the hell effect, marked by passivity and resignation
-What’s the point, I might as well eat the lot.
Supporting research, restraint and disinhibition
Wardle and Beales
-27 obese women were either placed on a restrictive eating diet, exercise and no diet at all
-The restrained eaters binged significantly more than the non restrictive groups even though they had less general food consumption throughout the week
Contradictory research
Savage
-Longitudinal studies into restrictive eating
-Measure the dietary restraint of 163 women every 2 years for 6 years, and measures their weight
-They found a significant negative correlation, the more people restrictively are, the more weight they lost
-Leads to weight loss in the long term
Practical application
-Boundary model predicts that food intake is consciously limited with the paradoxical outcome being overeating
-Weight loss advice being focused on training dieters to eat at a slower rate instead of restricting